Ideguchi E, Kibédi T, Dowie J T H, Hoang T H, Kumar Raju M, Aoi N, Mitchell A J, Stuchbery A E, Shimizu N, Utsuno Y, Akber A, Bignell L J, Coombes B J, Eriksen T K, Gray T J, Lane G J, McCormick B P
Research Center for Nuclear Physics (RCNP), Osaka University, 10-1 Mihogaoka, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan.
Department of Nuclear Physics and Accelerator Applications, Research School of Physics, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia.
Phys Rev Lett. 2022 Jun 24;128(25):252501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.252501.
The electric monopole (E0) transition strength ρ^{2} for the transition connecting the third 0^{+} level, a "superdeformed" band head, to the "spherical" 0^{+} ground state in doubly magic ^{40}Ca is determined via e^{+}e^{-} pair-conversion spectroscopy. The measured value ρ^{2}(E0;0_{3}^{+}→0_{1}^{+})=2.3(5)×10^{-3} is the smallest ρ^{2}(E0;0^{+}→0^{+}) found in A<50 nuclei. In contrast, the E0 transition strength to the ground state observed from the second 0^{+} state, a band head of "normal" deformation, is an order of magnitude larger ρ^{2}(E0;0_{2}^{+}→0_{1}^{+})=25.9(16)×10^{-3}, which shows significant mixing between these two states. Large-scale shell-model (LSSM) calculations are performed to understand the microscopic structure of the excited states and the configuration mixing between them; experimental ρ^{2} values in ^{40}Ca and neighboring isotopes are well reproduced by the LSSM calculations. The unusually small ρ^{2}(E0;0_{3}^{+}→0_{1}^{+}) value is due to destructive interference in the mixing of shape-coexisting structures, which are based on several different multiparticle-multihole excitations. This observation goes beyond the usual treatment of E0 strengths, where two-state shape mixing cannot result in destructive interference.
通过正电子-电子对转换光谱法确定了双幻核(^{40}Ca)中连接第三个(0^{+})能级(一个“超形变”带首)与“球形”(0^{+})基态的跃迁的电单极((E0))跃迁强度(\rho^{2})。测量值(\rho^{2}(E0;0_{3}^{+}→0_{1}^{+}) = 2.3(5)×10^{-3})是在(A < 50)核中发现的最小的(\rho^{2}(E0;0^{+}→0^{+}))。相比之下,从第二个(0^{+})态(一个“正常”形变的带首)观测到的到基态的(E0)跃迁强度要大一个数量级,(\rho^{2}(E0;0_{2}^{+}→0_{1}^{+}) = 25.9(16)×10^{-3}),这表明这两个态之间有显著的混合。进行了大规模壳模型(LSSM)计算以理解激发态的微观结构以及它们之间的组态混合;(^{40}Ca)和相邻同位素的实验(\rho^{2})值通过LSSM计算得到了很好的再现。异常小的(\rho^{2}(E0;0_{3}^{+}→0_{1}^{+}))值是由于基于几种不同多粒子-多空穴激发的形状共存结构混合中的相消干涉。这一观测超出了对(E0)强度的常规处理,在常规处理中两态形状混合不会导致相消干涉。