Suppr超能文献

临床评估非侵入性产前筛查以检测胎儿全基因组拷贝数变异。

Clinical evaluation of non-invasive prenatal screening for the detection of fetal genome-wide copy number variants.

机构信息

Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, No.16 Ding Xiang Road, Changzhou, 213003, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Jul 8;17(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02406-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study explores and discusses the possible factors affecting the positive predictive value (PPV) of non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for the detection of fetal copy number variants (CNVs) in pregnant women.

METHODS

NIPS was performed for 50,972 pregnant women and 212 cases were suspected as fetal CNVs. Post additional genetic counseling for these women, 96 underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis (amniocentesis), following which they received chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). We analyzed the PPV of NIPS for the detection of fetal CNVs and the possible interference factors that could affect the PPV.

RESULTS

Among the 96 pregnant women that received prenatal diagnosis by CMA, 37 cases were confirmed to be true positive for fetal CNVs with a PPV of 38.5%. There was no significant difference between the women with different NIPS indications. Five cases were reported as the false positive and false negative of fetal CNVs and the differences were mainly reflected in the inconsistency of chromosome fragments. Depending on the sizes of the CNVs, the PPVs were 48.7% for CNVs < 3 Mb, 41.4% for CNVs falling within 3 ~ 5 Mb, 42.9% for the CNVs falling within 5 ~ 10 Mb, and 14.3% for CNVs > 10 Mb. Based on the chromosomal locations of CNVs, the PPV(4.8%) of the chromosomes of group C(including chromosomes 6 ~ 12), was lower than that of the other groups (41.2% ~ 66.7%) (p = 0.021). However, there were no significant differences in the CNV characteristics, fetal fractions, unique reads, and the Z-scores between these groups.

CONCLUSION

NIPS with a low-coverage sequencing depth has a certain effect on detection of fetal CNVs with the PPV of 38.5%. Chromosomal locations of CNVs may be the main factor that influences its effect. This study can contribute to an increased accuracy in genetic counseling and in predicting NIPS results that are positive for fetal CNVs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨和分析影响无创产前筛查(NIPS)检测胎儿拷贝数变异(CNV)阳性预测值(PPV)的可能因素。

方法

对 50972 名孕妇进行 NIPS 检测,其中 212 例疑似胎儿 CNV。对这些孕妇进行额外的遗传咨询后,96 名孕妇接受了羊膜穿刺术(羊水穿刺)进行侵入性产前诊断,随后进行了染色体微阵列分析(CMA)。我们分析了 NIPS 检测胎儿 CNV 的 PPV 及可能影响其 PPV 的干扰因素。

结果

96 例孕妇经 CMA 产前诊断后,37 例确诊为胎儿 CNV 阳性,PPV 为 38.5%。不同 NIPS 适应证的孕妇间无显著差异。5 例为胎儿 CNV 的假阳性和假阴性,差异主要反映在染色体片段的不一致性。根据 CNV 的大小,PPV 分别为:CNV<3 Mb 为 48.7%;CNV 35 Mb 为 41.4%;CNV 510 Mb 为 42.9%;CNV>10 Mb 为 14.3%。根据 CNV 的染色体位置,C 组(包括 612 号染色体)的 PPV(4.8%)低于其他组(41.2%66.7%)(p=0.021)。然而,这些组间 CNV 特征、胎儿比例、独特读取和 Z 分数无显著差异。

结论

低深度测序的 NIPS 对检测胎儿 CNV 具有一定效果,其 PPV 为 38.5%。CNV 的染色体位置可能是影响其效果的主要因素。本研究有助于提高遗传咨询的准确性和预测 NIPS 对胎儿 CNV 阳性的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4a7/9264683/56f7e52d6dd2/13023_2022_2406_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验