Di Franco Rossella, Borzillo Valentina, Scipilliti Esmeralda, Ametrano Gianluca, Serra Marcello, Arrichiello Cecilia, Savino Federica, De Martino Fortuna, D'Alesio Valentina, Cammarota Fabrizio, Crispo Anna, Pignata Sandro, Rossetti Sabrina, Quarto Giuseppe, Muto Paolo
Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
LB Business Services RSL, 00124 Rome, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 29;14(13):3187. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133187.
The management of prostate cancer recurrence following external beam radiotherapy is not defined yet. Stereotaxic body reirradiation therapy showed encouraging results for local and biochemical control. From April 2017 to December 2020, 29 patients with prostate cancer recurrence were collected, joining the retrospective studies CyPro (prot. 46/19 OSS) and CLARO (Prot. 19/20 OSS) trials. Patients received Cyberknife treatment (17 pts) or alternatively VMAT (Volumetric Modulated Arc Technique) therapy by IGRT (Image-Guided Radiation Therapy)/Clarity (12 pts). By comparing the reirradiation of two groups, urinary (GU), rectal (GI) toxicities, and biochemical control were investigated. Further, the two techniques were dosimetrically compared by rival plans. The VMAT-IGRT Clarity treatments were replanned with an optimized template developed for prostate VMAT-SBRT in FFF mode keeping the same dose and fractionation scheduled for Cyberknife Group (30 Gy in 5 fx, at 80% isodose). In the CK group, 23% of patients experienced grade 2 acute GU, while 6% grade 2 acute GI. In the VMAT-Clarity group, acute GU toxicity was recorded in 17%, while for 8% grade 2 late toxicity was recorded. The dosimetric analysis shows that the VMAT-FFF allows to deliver a biological equivalent dose to CK, with the advantage of reducing the likelihood of toxicities arising.
外照射放疗后前列腺癌复发的管理尚未明确。立体定向体部再照射治疗在局部和生化控制方面显示出令人鼓舞的结果。从2017年4月至2020年12月,收集了29例前列腺癌复发患者,纳入回顾性研究CyPro(协议号46/19 OSS)和CLARO(协议号19/20 OSS)试验。患者接受了射波刀治疗(17例),或者通过影像引导放射治疗(IGRT)/Clarity进行容积调强弧形技术(VMAT)治疗(12例)。通过比较两组的再照射情况,研究了泌尿(GU)、直肠(GI)毒性和生化控制情况。此外,通过对比计划对这两种技术进行了剂量学比较。VMAT-IGRT Clarity治疗采用为前列腺VMAT-SBRT在FFF模式下开发的优化模板重新计划,保持与射波刀组相同的剂量和分割方案(5次分割,每次6 Gy,80%等剂量线)。在射波刀组中,23%的患者出现2级急性GU毒性,而6%出现2级急性GI毒性。在VMAT-Clarity组中,17%记录到急性GU毒性,而8%记录到2级晚期毒性。剂量学分析表明,VMAT-FFF能够给予与射波刀相当的生物等效剂量,具有降低毒性发生可能性的优势。