Yahyaee Ali, Bahman Amir Sajjad, Olesen Klaus, Sørensen Henrik
Department of Energy, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.
Danfoss Silicon Power, 24941 Flensburg, Germany.
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022 Jun 29;12(13):2228. doi: 10.3390/nano12132228.
Simulations of thermally driven phase change phenomena of nanofluids are still in their infancy. Locating the gas-liquid interface location as precisely as possible is one of the primary problems in simulating such flows. The VOF method is the most applied interface description method in commercial and open-source CFD software to simulate nanofluids' thermal phase change. Using the VOF method directs to inaccurate curvature calculation, which drives artificial flows (numerical non-physical velocities), especially in the vicinity of the gas-liquid interface. To recover accuracy in simulation results by VOF, a solver coupling VOF with the level-set interface description method can be used, in which the VOF is employed to capture the interface since it is a mass conserving method and the level-set is employed to calculate the curvature and physical quantities near the interface. We implemented the aforementioned coupled level-set and VOF (CLSVOF) method within the open-source OpenFOAM® framework and conducted a comparative analysis between CLSVOF and VOF (the default interface capturing method) to demonstrate the CLSVOF method's advantages and disadvantages in various phase change scenarios. Using experimental mathematical correlations from the literature, we consider the effect of nanoparticles on the base fluid. Results shows that the new inferred technique provides more precise curvature calculation and greater agreement between simulated and analytical/benchmark solutions, but at the expense of processing time.
纳米流体热驱动相变现象的模拟仍处于起步阶段。尽可能精确地确定气液界面位置是模拟此类流动的主要问题之一。VOF方法是商业和开源CFD软件中模拟纳米流体热相变时应用最广泛的界面描述方法。使用VOF方法会导致曲率计算不准确,从而产生人工流动(数值非物理速度),尤其是在气液界面附近。为了通过VOF恢复模拟结果的准确性,可以使用一种将VOF与水平集界面描述方法耦合的求解器,其中VOF用于捕获界面,因为它是一种质量守恒方法,而水平集用于计算界面附近的曲率和物理量。我们在开源的OpenFOAM®框架内实现了上述耦合水平集和VOF(CLSVOF)方法,并对CLSVOF和VOF(默认界面捕捉方法)进行了对比分析,以展示CLSVOF方法在各种相变场景中的优缺点。利用文献中的实验数学关联式,我们考虑了纳米颗粒对基础流体的影响。结果表明,新的推断技术提供了更精确的曲率计算,并且模拟结果与解析/基准解之间的一致性更高,但代价是处理时间增加。