• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胎儿心外膜脂肪厚度增加:妊娠期糖尿病及围生期结局的一个反映性发现。

Increased fetal epicardial fat thickness: A reflecting finding for GDM and perinatal outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Perinatology, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Maternity and Women's Health, Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Echocardiography. 2022 Aug;39(8):1082-1088. doi: 10.1111/echo.15416. Epub 2022 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1111/echo.15416
PMID:35808919
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the value of fetal epicardial fat thickness (EFT) in gestational diabetes mellitus in the third trimester of pregnancy and its relationship with clinical parameters and perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 80 participants, including 40 with diagnosed GDM and 40 healthy pregnant women, were included in the study. Demographic data were obtained from medical records. Sonographic examinations were performed, such as amniotic fluid value, fetal biometric measurements, and Doppler parameters of the umbilical artery. Fetal EFT values were measured at the free wall of the right ventricle using a reference line with echocardiographic methods. Correlation tests were performed to evaluate the relationship between fetal EFT and clinical and perinatal parameters. p < .05 were interpreted as statistically significant.

RESULTS

The fetal EFT value was statistically higher in the GDM group than in the control group (p: .000). Spearman and Pearson correlation tests revealed statistically significant but weak positive correlations between fetal EFT value, 1-h 100-g OGTT, birth weight, and BMI (r: .198, p: .047; r: .395, p: .012; r: .360, p: .042, respectively). The optimal fetal EFT threshold for predicting GDM disease was found as 1.55 mm, with a specificity of 74.4% and sensitivity of 75.0%. Statistically significant differences between the two groups in umbilical artery Doppler resistance index (RI), pulsatility index (PI), and systolic/diastolic ratio (S/D) were not found (p: .337; p: .503; p: .155;). BMI and amniotic fluid volume were higher in the GDM group compared to the control group (p: .009; p < .01).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that increased fetal EFT may occur as a reflection of changes in glucose metabolism in intrauterine life. Future studies with larger series, including the study of neonatal metabolic parameters, will contribute to the understanding of the importance of fetal EFT in determining the metabolic status of the fetus.

摘要

目的

研究胎儿心外膜脂肪厚度(EFT)在妊娠晚期妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)中的价值及其与临床参数和围产结局的关系。

方法

本研究纳入了 80 名参与者,包括 40 名确诊为 GDM 的孕妇和 40 名健康孕妇。从病历中获取人口统计学数据。进行超声检查,如羊水值、胎儿生物测量和脐动脉多普勒参数。使用超声心动图方法的参考线测量右心室游离壁的胎儿 EFT 值。采用相关性检验评估胎儿 EFT 与临床和围产参数的关系。p<.05 表示有统计学意义。

结果

GDM 组胎儿 EFT 值明显高于对照组(p:.000)。Spearman 和 Pearson 相关性检验显示,胎儿 EFT 值与 1h 100gOGTT、出生体重和 BMI 之间存在统计学上显著但较弱的正相关(r:.198,p:.047;r:.395,p:.012;r:.360,p:.042)。预测 GDM 疾病的最佳胎儿 EFT 阈值为 1.55mm,特异性为 74.4%,敏感性为 75.0%。两组间脐动脉多普勒阻力指数(RI)、搏动指数(PI)和收缩/舒张比(S/D)无统计学差异(p:.337;p:.503;p:.155)。GDM 组 BMI 和羊水体积均高于对照组(p:.009;p<.01)。

结论

本研究表明,胎儿 EFT 的增加可能是宫内生活中葡萄糖代谢变化的反映。未来更大系列的研究,包括新生儿代谢参数的研究,将有助于了解胎儿 EFT 在确定胎儿代谢状态方面的重要性。

相似文献

1
Increased fetal epicardial fat thickness: A reflecting finding for GDM and perinatal outcomes.胎儿心外膜脂肪厚度增加:妊娠期糖尿病及围生期结局的一个反映性发现。
Echocardiography. 2022 Aug;39(8):1082-1088. doi: 10.1111/echo.15416. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
2
Predicting adverse perinatal outcomes with fetal modified myocardial performance index and epicardial fat tissue thickness in diabetes-complicated pregnancies.利用胎儿改良心肌做功指数和糖尿病合并妊娠的心外膜脂肪组织厚度预测不良围产结局。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Nov;27(21):10620-10630. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202311_34342.
3
Fetal epicardial fat thickness in fetal growth restriction; effects on fetal heart function and relationship with the severity of disease.胎儿生长受限中胎儿心外膜脂肪厚度;对胎儿心脏功能的影响及其与疾病严重程度的关系。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):6946-6952. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1931676. Epub 2021 May 31.
4
Association of increased fetal epicardial fat thickness with maternal pregestational and gestational diabetes.胎儿心外膜脂肪厚度增加与母亲孕前和妊娠期糖尿病的关联。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023 Dec;36(1):2183474. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2183474.
5
Fetal Epicardial Fat Thickness: Its Role as Marker for Gestational Diabetic Mellitus.胎儿心包脂肪厚度:其作为妊娠期糖尿病标志物的作用。
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2023 Mar 4;33(3):302-308. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1762936. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Fetal epicardial fat thickness in non-severe idiopathic polyhydramnios: Its impact on fetal cardiac function and perinatal outcomes.非严重特发性羊水过多胎儿的心外膜脂肪厚度:对胎儿心功能和围产结局的影响。
J Clin Ultrasound. 2023 Jul-Aug;51(6):974-980. doi: 10.1002/jcu.23476. Epub 2023 May 18.
7
Increased fetal epicardial fat thickness: A novel ultrasound marker for altered fetal metabolism in diabetic pregnancies.胎儿心外膜脂肪厚度增加:糖尿病妊娠中胎儿代谢改变的一种新型超声标志物。
J Clin Ultrasound. 2018 Jul;46(6):397-402. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22602. Epub 2018 May 8.
8
Epicardial fat thickness in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus and its association with N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide.妊娠期糖尿病患者的心外膜脂肪厚度及其与 N 末端脑利钠肽前体的关系。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2024 Feb;28(3):1044-1051. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202402_35340.
9
A cut-off value of epicardial fat thickness for the prediction of large for gestational age foetuses.预测胎儿大于胎龄的超声心动图下心外膜脂肪厚度截断值。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Feb;41(2):224-228. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2020.1732895. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
10
Does gestational diabetes history increase epicardial fat and carotid intima media thickness?妊娠期糖尿病史会增加心外膜脂肪和颈动脉内膜中层厚度吗?
Echocardiography. 2014 Nov;31(10):1182-7. doi: 10.1111/echo.12597. Epub 2014 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of maternal diabetes during pregnancy on ultrasound-measured fetal epicardial fat thickness: A meta-analysis.孕期母亲糖尿病对超声测量胎儿心外膜脂肪厚度的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Biomol Biomed. 2025 Apr 26;25(6):1245-1258. doi: 10.17305/bb.2025.11909.