Department of Clinical Sciences, Speech-Language Pathology, Umea University, 90187, Umea, Sweden.
Dysphagia. 2023 Feb;38(1):483-490. doi: 10.1007/s00455-022-10490-w. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
The Timed Water Swallow Test (TWST) and the Test of Mastication of Solids (TOMASS) are dysphagia screening procedures that have been shown to be reliably assessed from video. The reliability of the procedures performed over telemedicine has not previously been assessed. TWST and TOMASS outcomes in two situations (both face-to-face and over telemedicine) were compared for 48 participants (aged 60-90; 27 with clinical conditions and 21 older persons). Both testing situation and test performed order were randomized, and all assessment procedures were performed within 3 h of each other. The results indicated a high level of agreement between face-to-face and telemedicine screening outcomes for TWST and TOMASS, respectively. The assessments indicated an 83% and 76% agreement in classifications of individual participants as within or outside normal limits for the TWST and TOMASS for the two test situations. The TWST showed a balanced distribution in differing classification in telemedicine (0.16-0.19 error rates). The TOMASS procedure classified more participants as outside normal limits over telemedicine compared to face-to-face administration. Agreement in the observed number of swallows was substantially lower than other outcome measures, which is attributed to increased difficulty in observing this property over video. Most participants (60%) reported that they would prefer telemedicine over face-to-face assessments, and 90% viewed the procedure as more accessible than expected. All participants were satisfied with the telemedicine procedures. The results suggest that clinical assessment of dysphagia over telemedicine using the TWST and TOMASS are viable alternatives to face-to-face administration of the procedures.
限时饮水吞咽测试(TWST)和固体咀嚼测试(TOMASS)是两种用于吞咽障碍筛查的方法,其视频评估结果已被证实具有可靠性。然而,这些方法通过远程医疗进行评估的可靠性尚未得到评估。本研究旨在比较 TWST 和 TOMASS 在面对面和远程医疗两种情况下的结果。共有 48 名参与者(年龄 60-90 岁;27 名患有临床疾病,21 名健康老年人)参与了本研究。两种测试情况和测试执行顺序均随机,且所有评估程序均在彼此 3 小时内完成。结果表明,TWST 和 TOMASS 的面对面和远程医疗筛查结果具有高度一致性。评估结果表明,在两种测试情况下,将个体参与者分类为正常或异常的一致性分别为 83%和 76%。TWST 在远程医疗中的分类具有平衡的分布(0.16-0.19 的错误率)。与面对面评估相比,TOMASS 程序在远程医疗中将更多的参与者分类为异常。观察到的吞咽次数的一致性明显低于其他测量结果,这归因于在视频中观察到这一特性的难度增加。大多数参与者(60%)表示他们更喜欢远程医疗评估,90%的参与者认为该程序比预期更容易获得。所有参与者对远程医疗程序均表示满意。研究结果表明,使用 TWST 和 TOMASS 通过远程医疗对吞咽障碍进行临床评估是面对面执行这些程序的可行替代方案。