• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脑损伤后 24 小时内的红细胞输血和血红蛋白水平与神经功能结局的关系。

Red blood cell transfusion and hemoglobin level on neurological outcome in the first 24 hours of traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Sep;59:74-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.06.058. Epub 2022 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2022.06.058
PMID:35809538
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Target hemoglobin (Hb) level is not clearly determined in patients followed up in the intensive care unit (ICU) for traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aims to investigate the impact of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and Hb level on the neurological outcome in the first 24 h in patients with TBI.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we reviewed the 2-year organizational database. We evaluated data from patients who underwent RBC transfusion and whose Hb values were 7-9 g/dL and >9 g/dL in the first 24 h. We considered that a Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) of 1-3 at the time of discharge from the ICU was a poor neurological outcome (PO) and that a GOS > 3 was a good neurological outcome (GO).

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients were included in the study 28.6% of whom were discharged from the intensive care unit with PO. The Hb (g/dL) values of PO patients in the first 24 h were lower compared to those of GO patients (median [interquartile range]; 9.2 [2.5] vs 11 [3.4], p < 0.01). RBC transfusion of PO patients in the first 24 h was also less compared to that of GO patients (median [interquartile range]; 15 [35.7] vs. 19 [18.1], p = 0.038). In logistic regression analyses, neither RBC transfusion (OR [95%CI]; 0.786 (0.108-5.740), p = 0.81) nor Hb level (OR [95% CI]; 0.50 (0.057-4.362), p = 0.53) was an independent risk factor for PO.

CONCLUSION

In patients followed up in the ICU due to TBI, RBC transfusion and Hb values in the first 24 h are not associated with PO at the time of discharge from the ICU.

摘要

目的

在因创伤性脑损伤(TBI)而入住重症监护病房(ICU)的患者中,目标血红蛋白(Hb)水平尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨 TBI 患者伤后 24 小时内 RBC 输注和 Hb 水平对神经预后的影响。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,我们查阅了组织数据库的 2 年数据。我们评估了接受 RBC 输注且在伤后 24 小时内 Hb 值为 7-9g/dL 和>9g/dL 的患者的数据。我们认为,从 ICU 出院时格拉斯哥预后评分(GOS)为 1-3 分的患者神经预后不良(PO),GOS>3 分的患者神经预后良好(GO)。

结果

共有 147 例患者纳入研究,其中 28.6%的患者从 ICU 出院时 PO。与 GO 患者相比,PO 患者伤后 24 小时的 Hb(g/dL)值更低(中位数[四分位数间距];9.2[2.5] vs 11[3.4],p<0.01)。与 GO 患者相比,PO 患者伤后 24 小时 RBC 输注也较少(中位数[四分位数间距];15[35.7] vs. 19[18.1],p=0.038)。在逻辑回归分析中,RBC 输注(OR[95%CI];0.786(0.108-5.740),p=0.81)和 Hb 水平(OR[95%CI];0.50(0.057-4.362),p=0.53)均不是 PO 的独立危险因素。

结论

在因 TBI 而入住 ICU 的患者中,伤后 24 小时内 RBC 输注和 Hb 值与 ICU 出院时的 PO 无关。

相似文献

1
Red blood cell transfusion and hemoglobin level on neurological outcome in the first 24 hours of traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后 24 小时内的红细胞输血和血红蛋白水平与神经功能结局的关系。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Sep;59:74-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.06.058. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
2
Haemoglobin values, transfusion practices, and long-term outcomes in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury: a secondary analysis of CENTER-TBI.创伤性脑损伤重症患者的血红蛋白值、输血实践和长期结局:CENTER-TBI 的二次分析。
Crit Care. 2024 Jun 14;28(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04980-6.
3
Red blood cell transfusion in acute brain injury subtypes: An observational cohort study.急性脑损伤亚型的红细胞输血:一项观察性队列研究。
J Crit Care. 2019 Apr;50:44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 11.
4
Red Blood Cell Transfusion in the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房中的红细胞输血。
JAMA. 2023 Nov 21;330(19):1852-1861. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.20737.
5
Hemoglobin thresholds and red blood cell transfusion in adult patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injuries: A retrospective cohort study.成人中重度创伤性脑损伤患者的血红蛋白阈值和红细胞输血:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Crit Care. 2018 Jun;45:133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.01.023. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
6
Hemoglobin concentrations and RBC transfusion thresholds in patients with acute brain injury: an international survey.急性脑损伤患者的血红蛋白浓度和红细胞输血阈值:一项国际调查。
Crit Care. 2017 Jun 17;21(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1748-4.
7
Safety and cost efficiency of a restrictive transfusion protocol in patients with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者限制性输血方案的安全性和成本效率。
J Neurosurg. 2018 May;128(5):1530-1537. doi: 10.3171/2017.1.JNS162234. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
8
Blood loss from laboratory testing, anemia, and red blood cell transfusion in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study.重症监护病房实验室检查、贫血和红细胞输血所致失血:一项回顾性研究。
Transfusion. 2020 Feb;60(2):256-261. doi: 10.1111/trf.15649. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
9
Progressive hemorrhagic injury after severe traumatic brain injury: effect of hemoglobin transfusion thresholds.严重创伤性脑损伤后的进行性出血性损伤:血红蛋白输血阈值的影响。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Nov;125(5):1229-1234. doi: 10.3171/2015.11.JNS151515. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
10
Concomitant severe traumatic brain injury is not associated with increased red blood cell transfusion volumes in patients with pelvic fractures: A retrospective observational study.合并严重创伤性脑损伤与骨盆骨折患者红细胞输注量增加无关:一项回顾性观察研究。
Injury. 2024 Mar;55(3):111296. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111296. Epub 2023 Dec 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and mortality related risk factors in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: A meta‑analysis.重型颅脑损伤患者发病率和死亡率的相关危险因素:一项荟萃分析。
Exp Ther Med. 2025 Feb 24;29(4):84. doi: 10.3892/etm.2025.12834. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Real-world efficacy of transfusion with liberal or restrictive strategy in traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤中采用宽松或限制性输血策略的真实世界疗效
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2025 Jan;12(1):203-212. doi: 10.1002/acn3.52272. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
3
The Efficacy of Traumatic Brain Injury Treatment by Neurotrauma Specialists.
神经创伤专家治疗创伤性脑损伤的疗效
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2024 Mar 21;20(1):8-16. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2024.20.e12. eCollection 2024 Mar.