Cacciamani Federica, Godefroy Valérie, Brambati Simona M, Migliaccio Raffaella, Epelbaum Stéphane, Montembeault Maxime
ARAMISLab, Inserm, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Inria, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
PHARes Team, Bordeaux Population Health, University of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux, France.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Jun 16;14:811739. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.811739. eCollection 2022.
: Characterizing self- and informant-reported cognitive complaints, as well as awareness of cognitive decline (ACD), is useful for an early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, complaints and ACD related to cognitive functions other than memory are poorly studied. Furthermore, it remains unclear which source of information is the most useful to distinguish various groups on the AD spectrum. : Self- and informant-reported complaints were measured with the Everyday Cognition questionnaire (ECog-Subject and ECog-StudyPartner) in four domains (memory, language, visuospatial, and executive). ACD was measured as the subject-informant discrepancy in the four ECog scores. We compared the ECog and ACD scores across cognitive domains between four groups: 71 amyloid-positive individuals with amnestic AD, 191 amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or 118 cognitively normal (CN), and 211 amyloid-negative CN controls, selected from the ADNI database. Receiver operating characteristic curves analysis was performed to evaluate the accuracy of the ECog and ACD scores in discriminating clinical groups. : Self- and informant-reported complaints were generally distributed as follows: memory, language, executive, and visuospatial (from the most severe to the least severe). Both groups of CN participants presented on average more memory and language complaints than their informant. MCI participants showed good agreement with their informants. AD participants presented anosognosia in all domains, but especially for the executive domain. The four ECog-StudyPartner sub-scores allowed excellent discrimination between groups in almost all classifications and performed significantly better than the other two classifiers considered. The ACD was excellent in distinguishing the participants with AD from the two groups of CN participants. The ECog-Subject was the least accurate in discriminating groups in four of the six classifications performed. : In research, the study of complaint and anosognosia should not be reduced solely to the memory domain. In clinical practice, non-amnestic complaints could also be linked to Alzheimer's disease. The presence of an informant also seems necessary given its accuracy as a source of information.
描述自我报告和他人报告的认知主诉以及认知衰退意识(ACD),对于阿尔茨海默病(AD)的早期诊断很有用。然而,与记忆以外的认知功能相关的主诉和ACD研究较少。此外,尚不清楚哪种信息来源对于区分AD谱系中的不同组最有用。
使用日常认知问卷(ECog-受试者版和ECog-研究伙伴版)在四个领域(记忆、语言、视觉空间和执行功能)测量自我报告和他人报告的主诉。ACD被测量为四个ECog评分中的受试者-他人差异。我们比较了从ADNI数据库中选取的四组人群在认知领域的ECog和ACD评分:71名患有遗忘型AD的淀粉样蛋白阳性个体、191名遗忘型轻度认知障碍(MCI)者或118名认知正常(CN)者,以及211名淀粉样蛋白阴性的CN对照。进行受试者工作特征曲线分析以评估ECog和ACD评分在区分临床组方面的准确性。
记忆、语言、执行功能和视觉空间(从最严重到最不严重)。两组CN参与者平均报告的记忆和语言主诉比他们的他人报告更多。MCI参与者与其他人报告的结果吻合度良好。AD参与者在所有领域均表现出疾病失认症,尤其是在执行功能领域。四个ECog-研究伙伴子评分在几乎所有分类中都能很好地区分不同组,并且表现明显优于所考虑的其他两个分类器。ACD在区分AD参与者与两组CN参与者方面表现出色。在六个分类中的四个分类中,ECog-受试者版在区分不同组时准确性最低。
在研究中,对主诉和疾病失认症的研究不应仅局限于记忆领域。在临床实践中,非遗忘型主诉也可能与阿尔茨海默病有关。鉴于他人报告作为信息来源的准确性,似乎也需要有他人报告。