• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Information sharing across mental health service providers and criminal legal system stakeholders: Perspectives of people with serious mental illnesses and their family members.精神卫生服务提供者和刑事法律系统利益相关者之间的信息共享:严重精神疾病患者及其家属的观点。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Aug;307:115178. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115178. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
2
Crisis Response Model Preferences of Mental Health Care Clients With Prior Misdemeanor Arrests and of Their Family and Friends.有前科逮捕的心理健康护理客户及其家人和朋友的危机应对模式偏好。
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Nov 1;74(11):1163-1170. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220363. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
3
Competing Concerns in Efforts to Reduce Criminal Legal Contact Among People with Serious Mental Illnesses: Findings from a Multi-City Study on Misdemeanor Arrests.减少严重精神疾病患者刑事法律接触的努力中的竞争问题:来自关于轻罪逮捕的多城市研究的结果。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2023 May;50(3):476-487. doi: 10.1007/s10488-023-01252-3. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
4
Criminal Legal Involvement: A Cause and Consequence of Social Determinants of Health.刑事法律介入:健康的社会决定因素的一个原因及后果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 Jan 1;73(1):108-111. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000741. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
5
Systemic, Racial Justice-Informed Solutions to Shift "Care" From the Criminal Legal System to the Mental Health Care System.系统性的、基于种族正义的解决方案,以将“关怀”从刑事法律系统转向精神卫生保健系统。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Dec 1;72(12):1428-1433. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000735. Epub 2021 May 12.
6
Mental Health Providers' Attitudes About Criminal Justice-Involved Clients With Serious Mental Illness.精神卫生服务提供者对涉及刑事司法的严重精神疾病患者的态度。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Apr 1;69(4):472-475. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700321. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
7
Misdemeanor Charges Among Individuals With Serious Mental Illnesses: A Statewide Analysis of More Than Two Million Arrests.患有严重精神疾病者的轻罪指控:对超过200万次逮捕的全州范围分析。
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Jan 1;74(1):31-37. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000936. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
8
What can we expect of police in the face of deficient mental health systems? Qualitative insights from Chicago police officers.面对心理健康系统的不足,我们能对警察抱有什么期望?来自芝加哥警察的定性见解。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Feb;28(1):28-42. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12691. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
9
Failure to Appear: Mental Health Professionals' Role Amidst Pretrial Justice Reform.未出庭:审前司法改革中心理健康专业人员的角色。
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 Jul;73(7):809-811. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100252. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
10
Approaching Jail Diversion and Prevention of Criminal Legal System Involvement Simultaneously.同时着手解决监狱分流和预防刑事法律系统介入问题。
Psychiatr Serv. 2024 May 1;75(5):489-491. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230218. Epub 2023 Dec 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review of pathways to care in the U.S. for Black individuals with early psychosis.对美国早期精神病黑人患者就医途径的系统评价。
NPJ Schizophr. 2021 Dec 2;7(1):58. doi: 10.1038/s41537-021-00185-w.
2
Privacy Assessment in Mobile Health Apps: Scoping Review.移动健康应用中的隐私评估:范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 2;8(7):e18868. doi: 10.2196/18868.
3
Patient Privacy Perspectives on Health Information Exchange in a Mental Health Context: Qualitative Study.心理健康背景下健康信息交换中的患者隐私视角:定性研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Nov 13;6(11):e13306. doi: 10.2196/13306.
4
Understanding the patient privacy perspective on health information exchange: A systematic review.理解患者对健康信息交换的隐私观点:系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 May;125:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
5
Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员共同决策使用率的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7(7):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4.
6
Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: evidence, theory and improvements.临床综述:精神健康智能手机应用程序的用户参与情况:证据、理论与改进。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Aug;21(3):116-119. doi: 10.1136/eb-2018-102891. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
7
Deaths of people with mental illness during interactions with law enforcement.患有精神疾病的人在与执法部门互动期间死亡。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2018 May-Jun;58:110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
8
A potential new form of jail diversion and reconnection to mental health services: I. Stakeholders' views on acceptability.一种潜在的新的监狱分流形式以及与心理健康服务的重新联系:I. 利益相关者对可接受性的看法。
Behav Sci Law. 2017 Sep;35(5-6):480-491. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2320. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
9
A potential new form of jail diversion and reconnection to mental health services: II. Demonstration of feasibility.一种潜在的新的监狱分流及重新接入心理健康服务的形式:II. 可行性论证
Behav Sci Law. 2017 Sep;35(5-6):492-500. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2319. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
10
Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care.在常规精神卫生保健中实施共同决策。
World Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;16(2):146-153. doi: 10.1002/wps.20412.

精神卫生服务提供者和刑事法律系统利益相关者之间的信息共享:严重精神疾病患者及其家属的观点。

Information sharing across mental health service providers and criminal legal system stakeholders: Perspectives of people with serious mental illnesses and their family members.

机构信息

Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Department of Psychiatry, New York, NY, USA; Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, USA.

Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Department of Psychiatry, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2022 Aug;307:115178. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115178. Epub 2022 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115178
PMID:35816835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11417423/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The overrepresentation of people with serious mental illnesses in the criminal legal system has spurred information-sharing initiatives to transmit information between mental health service providers and criminal legal system stakeholders with the goal of improving resources and streamlining access to care. However, no research to date has examined the perspectives of people with mental illnesses who have their information shared across these systems or the perspectives of their family members. This study examined the perspectives on mental health-criminal legal system information sharing among people with serious mental illnesses and a history of arrest, as well as their family members.

METHODS

Researchers interviewed 24 clients with serious mental illnesses and a history of arrest who are enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial of a police-mental health Linkage System as well as 11 of their family members. Participants were recruited and interviewed between November 2020 and February 2021. A thematic analysis was used to code and analyze all interview transcripts.

RESULTS

Study participants articulated perceived benefits and concerns around cross-system information sharing. There was strong support for information sharing in both directions, with the anticipation that such information sharing can prevent unnecessary arrest and/or incarceration, promote positive and safe interactions with criminal legal system professionals, and foster greater understanding and access to treatment. Concerns were more limited and largely related to perceived stigma around mental illnesses and the potential consequences of such stigma.

CONCLUSIONS

While concerns about information sharing should be considered, study participants overwhelmingly perceived the sharing of information between mental health providers and criminal legal stakeholders as a positive intervention. Such perspectives can be understood as a pragmatic choice in the face of criminal legal system contact and additional research could guide programmatic and policy changes.

摘要

目的

严重精神疾病患者在刑事法律系统中的过度代表促使信息共享计划在精神卫生服务提供者和刑事法律系统利益相关者之间传递信息,以改善资源并简化获得护理的途径。然而,迄今为止,没有研究检查过在这些系统中共享信息的精神疾病患者及其家属的观点,也没有研究过他们的观点。本研究考察了有严重精神疾病和被捕史的人以及他们的家庭成员对精神健康与刑事法律系统信息共享的看法。

方法

研究人员采访了 24 名有严重精神疾病和被捕史的参与者,他们参加了警察与精神卫生联系系统的一项随机对照试验,以及 11 名参与者的家庭成员。参与者是在 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 2 月期间招募和采访的。采用主题分析方法对所有访谈记录进行编码和分析。

结果

研究参与者详细阐述了对跨系统信息共享的看法,包括预期的益处和顾虑。对于双向信息共享都有强烈的支持,预期这种信息共享可以防止不必要的逮捕和/或监禁,促进与刑事法律系统专业人员的积极和安全互动,并促进对治疗的更多理解和获取。顾虑则较为有限,主要与对精神疾病的污名化和这种污名化的潜在后果有关。

结论

虽然应考虑信息共享的顾虑,但研究参与者普遍认为精神卫生提供者和刑事法律利益相关者之间的信息共享是一种积极的干预措施。在面对刑事法律系统的接触时,这种观点可以被理解为一种务实的选择,进一步的研究可以指导计划和政策的改变。