Obed Doha, Schroeter Andreas, Gruber Lisa, Salim Mustafa, Krezdorn Nicco, Vogt Peter M
Department of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Department of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Burns. 2023 Jun;49(4):830-837. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.06.017. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
Patients with psychiatric comorbidity have been shown to experience high rates of burn injury. Burn epidemiology, etiology, and outcomes have been sparsely documented for patients with major psychiatric disorders. The aim of this study was to analyze the epidemiologic characteristics and outcomes in intensive care burn patients with pre-existing and acute major psychiatric disorders .
A retrospective study was performed including intensive care burn patients admitted between March 2007 and December 2020. Demographic, clinical and epidemiological data were collected and analyzed. Major psychiatric co-morbidities were collected according to ICD-9 and ICD-10 classifications. Patients were stratified according to F-diagnoses.
A total of 1325 patients were included. 16.6 % of all patients had one or more major psychiatric disorders- 9.3 % with anxiety, dissociative, stress-related, somatoform and other nonpsychotic mental disorders, 9.2 % with mood (affective) disorders, 3.5 % with schizophrenia and other non-mood psychotic disorders, and 1.8 % with disorders of adult personality and behavior. Patients with major psychiatric disorders presented with significantly higher burn severity, reflected by higher abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI) scores (5.9 vs. 5.3, p < 0.001) and larger total body surface area (TBSA) affected (15.9 vs. 12.5 %, p = 0.002). Burned TBSA ≥ 30 and inhalation injuries were observed more frequently in patients with MDP, however without statistical significance. They also experienced prolonged hospital length-of-stay (LOS) (25.5 vs. 16.3 days, p < 0.001), prolonged intensive care unit LOS (14.8 vs. 7.7 days, p < 0.001), underwent surgical interventions (3.5 vs. 2.3, p < 0.001) and mechanical ventilation more frequently (34.1 % vs. 16.5 %, p = 0.43) and had significantly longer ventilation durations (73.5 vs. 31.2 h, p = 0.002). Mortality rates were lower compared to patients without major psychiatric disorders (5.9 vs. 8.1, p < 0.001).
The prevalence of major psychiatric disorders in burn patients is considerably high. Patients with psychiatric comorbidities were found to have greater burn severity, prolonged total hospital and ICU LOS, underwent surgical interventions and mechanical ventilation more frequently and had prolonged ventilation duration. Our results highlight the importance of identifying burn patients with major psychiatric disorders who may necessitate additional resources and require extensive inpatient psychiatric care and counseling.
有精神疾病合并症的患者烧伤发生率较高。关于患有重度精神疾病患者的烧伤流行病学、病因及预后的文献记载较少。本研究旨在分析患有既往及急性重度精神疾病的重症烧伤患者的流行病学特征及预后。
进行一项回顾性研究,纳入2007年3月至2020年12月期间收治的重症烧伤患者。收集并分析人口统计学、临床及流行病学数据。根据国际疾病分类第九版(ICD - 9)和第十版(ICD - 10)分类收集重度精神疾病合并症。患者根据F诊断进行分层。
共纳入1325例患者。所有患者中有16.6%患有一种或多种重度精神疾病,其中9.3%患有焦虑、分离性、应激相关、躯体形式及其他非精神病性精神障碍,9.2%患有心境(情感)障碍,3.5%患有精神分裂症及其他非心境性精神病性障碍,1.8%患有成人个性与行为障碍。患有重度精神疾病的患者烧伤严重程度明显更高,表现为更高的简化烧伤严重程度指数(ABSI)评分(5.9对5.3,p < 0.001)以及更大的全身烧伤面积(TBSA)(15.9%对12.5%,p = 0.002)。烧伤TBSA≥30及吸入性损伤在患有精神疾病合并症的患者中更常见,但无统计学意义。他们还经历了更长时间的住院时间(LOS)(25.5天对16.3天,p < 0.001)、更长时间的重症监护病房LOS(14.8天对7.7天,p < 0.001);更频繁地接受手术干预(3.5次对2.3次,p < 0.001)和机械通气(34.1%对16.5%,p = 0. ,43),且机械通气持续时间明显更长(73.5小时对31.2小时,p = 0.002)。与无重度精神疾病的患者相比死亡率更低(5.9%对8.1%,p < 0.001)。
烧伤患者中重度精神疾病的患病率相当高。发现患有精神疾病合并症的患者烧伤严重程度更高,住院及重症监护病房总LOS更长,更频繁地接受手术干预和机械通气,且机械通气持续时间更长。我们的结果凸显了识别可能需要额外资源并需要广泛住院精神护理及咨询的重度精神疾病烧伤患者的重要性。