Medical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Crit Care. 2022 Jul 11;26(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04046-5.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, concerted efforts were made by provincial and federal governments to invest in critical care infrastructure and medical equipment to bridge the gap of resource-limitation in intensive care units (ICUs) across Pakistan. An initial step in creating a plan toward strengthening Pakistan's baseline critical care capacity was to carry out a needs-assessment within the country to assess gaps and devise strategies for improving the quality of critical care facilities.
To assess the baseline critical care capacity of Pakistan, we conducted a series of cross-sectional surveys of hospitals providing COVID-19 care across the country. These hospitals were pre-identified by the Health Services Academy (HSA), Pakistan. Surveys were administered via telephonic and on-site interviews and based on a unique checklist for assessing critical care units which was created from the Partners in Health 4S Framework, which is: Space, Staff, Stuff, and Systems. These components were scored, weighted equally, and then ranked into quartiles.
A total of 106 hospitals were surveyed, with the majority being in the public sector (71.7%) and in the metropolitan setting (56.6%). We found infrastructure, staffing, and systems lacking as only 19.8% of hospitals had negative pressure rooms and 44.4% had quarantine facilities for staff. Merely 36.8% of hospitals employed accredited intensivists and 54.8% of hospitals maintained an ideal nurse-to-patient ratio. 31.1% of hospitals did not have a staffing model, while 37.7% of hospitals did not have surge policies. On Chi-square analysis, statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were noted between public and private sectors along with metropolitan versus rural settings in various elements. Almost all ranks showed significant disparity between public-private and metropolitan-rural settings, with private and metropolitan hospitals having a greater proportion in the 1st rank, while public and rural hospitals had a greater proportion in the lower ranks.
Pakistan has an underdeveloped critical care network with significant inequity between public-private and metropolitan-rural strata. We hope for future resource allocation and capacity development projects for critical care in order to reduce these disparities.
为应对 COVID-19 大流行,省级和联邦政府共同努力投资于重症监护基础设施和医疗设备,以弥合巴基斯坦各重症监护病房(ICU)资源短缺的差距。为加强巴基斯坦基线重症监护能力而制定计划的第一步是在该国进行需求评估,以评估差距并制定提高重症监护设施质量的策略。
为评估巴基斯坦的基本重症监护能力,我们对全国各地提供 COVID-19 护理的医院进行了一系列横断面调查。这些医院是由巴基斯坦卫生服务学院(HSA)预先确定的。调查通过电话和现场访谈进行,并基于从健康伙伴关系 4S 框架创建的独特重症监护单元评估清单,该框架包括:空间、人员、设备和系统。这些组件进行评分、权重相等,然后按四分位数排名。
共调查了 106 家医院,其中大部分为公立医院(71.7%)和大都市地区(56.6%)。我们发现基础设施、人员配备和系统不足,只有 19.8%的医院有负压室,44.4%的医院有工作人员隔离设施。仅有 36.8%的医院雇用了经认证的重症监护医师,而 54.8%的医院维持理想的护士与患者比例。31.1%的医院没有人员配备模式,而 37.7%的医院没有激增政策。在卡方分析中,公共和私营部门以及大都市和农村地区之间在各个方面都存在统计学显著差异(p<0.05)。几乎所有排名都显示了公共-私营和大都市-农村之间的显著差异,私营和大都市医院在第 1 名的比例较大,而公立和农村医院在较低排名的比例较大。
巴基斯坦的重症监护网络不发达,公私和大都市-农村之间存在显著的不平等。我们希望未来为重症监护分配资源和开展能力建设项目,以减少这些差距。