• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在日常实践中,脊柱麻醉是否是治疗结石病逆行性肾内手术的安全替代方法?

Is spinal anesthesia a safe alternative for retrograde intrarenal surgery for stone disease in daily practice?

机构信息

Urology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Anesthesia and Transplant Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

Arch Esp Urol. 2022 May 28;75(4):361-367. doi: 10.37554/en-j.arch.esp.urol-20210525-3501-21.

DOI:10.37554/en-j.arch.esp.urol-20210525-3501-21
PMID:35818917
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is commonly performed under general anesthesia (GA) because renal mobility during breathing may affect lithotripsy. However, spinal anesthesia (SA) is adopted in clinical practice due to clinical conditions that contraindicate GA. We aimed to compare results of RIRS for stones performed under GA compared to SA regarding stone-free rate (SFR) status and postoperative complications in a consecutive single-center series.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent RIRS for stones between 2017 and 2020.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

age ≥ 18 years, renal stone burden deemed suitable for RIRS with a stone diameter ≤ 20 mm.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

stones >20 mm, urinary tract infection, bilateral surgery, second-look procedures, unmodifiable bleeding diathesis, <5mm asymptomatic lower calyx stones. SFR was defined as no residual fragment >3 mm at 6-12 weeks follow-up. The choice of anesthesia was a shared decision between anesthesiologists and patient preference.

RESULTS

230 patients were included in the analysis. Mean age was 57.50±13.73 years. 33% of stones were located in the pelvis. 28.7% of patients had multiple stones. Mean cumulative stone diameter was 16.60±6.54 mm. 63% of patients underwent RIRS under SA. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of preoperative characteristics, except for comor-bidity, significantly higher in the GA group. Mean time of operating room occupation was longer in the GA group (81.58±35.37 minutes) than in the SA group (72.85±25.91 minutes,p=0.033). Length of stay was shorter in the SA group (mean 2.2±1.66 days vs 3.46±5.88 in GA,p=0.019). Logistic regression showed that multiple stones in the collecting system were associated with residual fragments (HR 0.386, 95%CI 0.151-0.991,p=0.04). There were no statistically significant differences in overall and high-grade complications, and in SFR between SA (75.9%) and GA groups (70.6%,p=0.317).

CONCLUSION

SA does not affect SFR and postoperative complications in patients who underwent RIRS in daily practice.

摘要

目的

逆行肾盂内碎石术(RIRS)通常在全身麻醉(GA)下进行,因为呼吸时肾脏的移动可能会影响碎石效果。然而,在临床实践中,由于存在 GA 禁忌的临床情况,会采用脊髓麻醉(SA)。我们旨在比较 GA 与 SA 下进行 RIRS 治疗结石的结果,包括无结石率(SFR)状态和术后并发症,这是一项连续的单中心研究。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2017 年至 2020 年间接受 RIRS 治疗结石的所有患者。

纳入标准

年龄≥18 岁,肾结石负荷适合 RIRS,结石直径≤20mm。

排除标准

结石>20mm、尿路感染、双侧手术、二次手术、不可改变的出血倾向、无症状的下盏<5mm 结石。SFR 定义为 6-12 周随访时无残余>3mm 碎片。麻醉选择是麻醉师和患者共同决定的。

结果

230 例患者纳入分析。平均年龄为 57.50±13.73 岁。33%的结石位于肾盂。28.7%的患者有多发性结石。平均结石总直径为 16.60±6.54mm。63%的患者接受 SA 下 RIRS。两组患者在术前特征方面无显著差异,除合并症外,GA 组明显更高。GA 组的手术室占用时间(81.58±35.37 分钟)长于 SA 组(72.85±25.91 分钟,p=0.033)。SA 组的住院时间较短(平均 2.2±1.66 天 vs GA 组的 3.46±5.88 天,p=0.019)。Logistic 回归显示,集合系统中的多发性结石与残石有关(HR 0.386,95%CI 0.151-0.991,p=0.04)。SA 组(75.9%)和 GA 组(70.6%,p=0.317)之间的总体和高级别并发症发生率和 SFR 无统计学差异。

结论

在日常实践中,SA 不会影响 RIRS 患者的 SFR 和术后并发症。

相似文献

1
Is spinal anesthesia a safe alternative for retrograde intrarenal surgery for stone disease in daily practice?在日常实践中,脊柱麻醉是否是治疗结石病逆行性肾内手术的安全替代方法?
Arch Esp Urol. 2022 May 28;75(4):361-367. doi: 10.37554/en-j.arch.esp.urol-20210525-3501-21.
2
Retrograde intra-renal surgery under spinal anesthesia: the first large series.脊髓麻醉下的逆行性肾内手术:首个大型系列研究。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2018 Jun;70(3):333-339. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.18.02926-0. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
3
Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones up to 15 mm. Prospective, randomized study.逆行性肾内手术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗直径达15毫米的下极肾结石的比较。前瞻性随机研究。
Actas Urol Esp. 2015 May;39(4):236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
4
Spinal versus general anesthesia in retrograde intrarenal surgery.逆行性肾内手术中脊髓麻醉与全身麻醉的比较。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022 Jun 29;94(2):195-198. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2022.2.195.
5
Efficacy of Aspiration-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath (ClearPETRA) in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.抽吸辅助输尿管通路鞘(ClearPETRA)在逆行性肾内手术中的疗效
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 May;34(5):420-424. doi: 10.1089/lap.2024.0076. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
6
Comparison of stone-free rate between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行性肾内手术的结石清除率比较。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2023 May 1;86(5):485-488. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000913. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
7
Retrograde intrarenal surgery for stone disease under spinal anaesthesia, a minimally invasive technique. A retrospective analysis of 1,467 cases.脊髓麻醉下逆行性肾内手术治疗结石病,一种微创技术。1467例病例的回顾性分析。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Jun;43(5):248-253. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2018.11.003. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
8
Comparative analysis of retrograde intrarenal surgery and modified ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower pole renal stones (1.5-3.5 cm).逆行性肾内手术与改良超微经皮肾镜取石术治疗下极肾结石(1.5-3.5cm)的对比分析。
BMC Urol. 2020 Mar 16;20(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00586-6.
9
Comparison of Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Pelvic Stones of 2-3 cm.2-3cm 肾盂结石的微创经皮肾镜取石术与逆行性肾内手术比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Jun;31(6):605-609. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0860. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
10
Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones ≤2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial.≤2厘米肾结石的软性输尿管肾镜检查与冲击波碎石术:一项随机对照试验
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Nov;8(6):1816-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Apr 22.