Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 12;12(7):e057026. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057026.
INTRODUCTION: Electronic clinical decision support (eCDS) tools are used to assist clinical decision making. Using computer-generated algorithms with evidence-based rule sets, they alert clinicians to events that require attention. eCDS tools generating alerts using nudge principles present clinicians with evidence-based clinical treatment options to guide clinician behaviour without restricting freedom of choice. Although eCDS tools have shown beneficial outcomes, challenges exist with regard to their acceptability most likely related to implementation. Furthermore, the pace of progress in this field has allowed little time to effectively evaluate the experience of the intended user. This scoping review aims to examine the development and implementation strategies, and the impact on the end user of eCDS tools that generate alerts using nudge principles, specifically in the critical care and peri-anaesthetic setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will follow the Arksey and O'Malley framework. A search will be conducted of literature published in the last 15 years in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science and SAGE databases. Citation screening and data extraction will be performed by two independent reviewers. Extracted data will include context, e-nudge tool type and design features, development, implementation strategies and associated impact on end users. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This scoping review will synthesise published literature therefore ethical approval is not required. Review findings will be published in topic relevant peer-reviewed journals and associated conferences.
简介:电子临床决策支持(eCDS)工具用于协助临床决策。它们使用基于证据的规则集生成计算机算法,提醒临床医生注意需要关注的事件。使用提示原则生成警报的 eCDS 工具为临床医生提供基于证据的临床治疗选择,以指导临床医生的行为,而不会限制他们的选择自由。尽管 eCDS 工具已经显示出有益的结果,但在可接受性方面存在挑战,这很可能与实施有关。此外,该领域的进展速度使得几乎没有时间来有效地评估预期用户的体验。本范围综述旨在检查使用提示原则生成警报的 eCDS 工具的开发和实施策略,以及对重症监护和围手术期环境中的最终用户的影响。 方法和分析:本综述将遵循 Arksey 和 O'Malley 框架。将在过去 15 年中在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、CENTRAL、Web of Science 和 SAGE 数据库中发表的文献进行搜索。将由两名独立评审员进行引文筛选和数据提取。提取的数据将包括背景、e-提示工具类型和设计特点、开发、实施策略以及对最终用户的相关影响。 伦理和传播:本范围综述将综合已发表的文献,因此不需要伦理批准。审查结果将发表在相关主题的同行评议期刊和相关会议上。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
JBI Evid Implement. 2021-3
JBI Evid Synth. 2020-10
AMA J Ethics. 2020-9-1
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019-12
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019-11-4