Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Iowa Orthop J. 2022 Jun;42(1):137-143.
Dual mobility (DM) bearings for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been proposed to reduce the risk of instability in high-risk patients; however, their utility in primary THA remains relatively unexplored. No previous reports have described whether surgical approach influences outcomes associated with DM implant systems. This study aims to compare patient reported outcomes and post-operative groin pain between patients undergoing anterior approach versus posterior approach following primary THA with DM implants.
We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent primary THA and received a DM implant between 2011-2021. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on surgical approach (anterior vs. posterior approach). Primary outcomes included the presence of substantial postoperative groin pain as well as readmission and revision rates. Demographic differences were assessed using chi-square and independent sample t-tests. Outcomes were compared using multilinear and logistic regressions.
Of the 495 patients identified, 55 (11%) underwent THA via the anterior approach and 440 (89%) via the posterior approach. Surgical time (100.24 vs. 109.42 minutes, p=0.070), length of stay (2.19vs.2.67 days,p=0.072), discharge disposition (p=0.151), and significant postoperative groin pain (1.8%vs.0.7%,p=0.966) did not statistically differ between the cohorts. 90-day readmission (9.1%vs.7.7%,p=0.823) and revision rate (0.0%vs.3.0%,p=0.993) did not significantly differ as well. Specifically, readmission (p=0.993) and revision (p=0.998) for instability did not significantly differ between the cohorts. We found no statistical difference in HOOS, JR (p=0.425), VR-12 PCS (p=0.718), and VR-12 MCS (p=0.257) delta score improvement from preoperative to 1-year follow-up between the two groups.
Comparable outcomes following implantation of DM constructs may be achievable irrespective of the surgical approach employed. The incidence of iliopsoas injections for groin pain did not significantly differ between anterior and posterior approaches. Future investigation is needed to determine whether surgical approach influences long-term outcomes in patients receiving DM implants. .
双动(DM)髋关节假体已被提议用于全髋关节置换术(THA),以降低高危患者不稳定的风险;然而,它们在初次 THA 中的应用仍相对未知。以前没有报告描述手术入路是否会影响 DM 植入物系统相关的结果。本研究旨在比较初次 THA 后接受 DM 植入物的患者采用前路和后路的患者报告结果和术后腹股沟疼痛。
我们回顾性分析了 2011 年至 2021 年间接受初次 THA 并接受 DM 植入物的所有患者。患者根据手术入路(前路与后路)分为两组。主要结果包括存在大量术后腹股沟疼痛以及再入院和翻修率。采用卡方检验和独立样本 t 检验评估人口统计学差异。采用多元线性和逻辑回归比较结果。
在 495 例患者中,55 例(11%)采用前路,440 例(89%)采用后路进行 THA。手术时间(100.24 与 109.42 分钟,p=0.070)、住院时间(2.19 与 2.67 天,p=0.072)、出院去向(p=0.151)和大量术后腹股沟疼痛(1.8%与 0.7%,p=0.966)在两组间无统计学差异。90 天再入院率(9.1%与 7.7%,p=0.823)和翻修率(0.0%与 3.0%,p=0.993)也无显著差异。具体来说,两组间不稳定的再入院率(p=0.993)和翻修率(p=0.998)无显著差异。我们发现两组之间从术前到 1 年随访的 HOOS、JR(p=0.425)、VR-12 PCS(p=0.718)和 VR-12 MCS(p=0.257)的改善差值评分无统计学差异。
无论采用何种手术入路,植入 DM 结构后可能都能获得可比较的结果。前路和后路的腹股沟疼痛注射髂腰肌的发生率无显著差异。需要进一步研究以确定手术入路是否会影响接受 DM 植入物的患者的长期结果。