Suppr超能文献

双动假体应用于前路和后路全髋关节置换术的相似临床效果。

Similar Outcomes Achieved Between Anterior and Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Dual Mobility Implants.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Iowa Orthop J. 2022 Jun;42(1):137-143.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dual mobility (DM) bearings for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been proposed to reduce the risk of instability in high-risk patients; however, their utility in primary THA remains relatively unexplored. No previous reports have described whether surgical approach influences outcomes associated with DM implant systems. This study aims to compare patient reported outcomes and post-operative groin pain between patients undergoing anterior approach versus posterior approach following primary THA with DM implants.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent primary THA and received a DM implant between 2011-2021. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on surgical approach (anterior vs. posterior approach). Primary outcomes included the presence of substantial postoperative groin pain as well as readmission and revision rates. Demographic differences were assessed using chi-square and independent sample t-tests. Outcomes were compared using multilinear and logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Of the 495 patients identified, 55 (11%) underwent THA via the anterior approach and 440 (89%) via the posterior approach. Surgical time (100.24 vs. 109.42 minutes, p=0.070), length of stay (2.19vs.2.67 days,p=0.072), discharge disposition (p=0.151), and significant postoperative groin pain (1.8%vs.0.7%,p=0.966) did not statistically differ between the cohorts. 90-day readmission (9.1%vs.7.7%,p=0.823) and revision rate (0.0%vs.3.0%,p=0.993) did not significantly differ as well. Specifically, readmission (p=0.993) and revision (p=0.998) for instability did not significantly differ between the cohorts. We found no statistical difference in HOOS, JR (p=0.425), VR-12 PCS (p=0.718), and VR-12 MCS (p=0.257) delta score improvement from preoperative to 1-year follow-up between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Comparable outcomes following implantation of DM constructs may be achievable irrespective of the surgical approach employed. The incidence of iliopsoas injections for groin pain did not significantly differ between anterior and posterior approaches. Future investigation is needed to determine whether surgical approach influences long-term outcomes in patients receiving DM implants. .

摘要

背景

双动(DM)髋关节假体已被提议用于全髋关节置换术(THA),以降低高危患者不稳定的风险;然而,它们在初次 THA 中的应用仍相对未知。以前没有报告描述手术入路是否会影响 DM 植入物系统相关的结果。本研究旨在比较初次 THA 后接受 DM 植入物的患者采用前路和后路的患者报告结果和术后腹股沟疼痛。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2011 年至 2021 年间接受初次 THA 并接受 DM 植入物的所有患者。患者根据手术入路(前路与后路)分为两组。主要结果包括存在大量术后腹股沟疼痛以及再入院和翻修率。采用卡方检验和独立样本 t 检验评估人口统计学差异。采用多元线性和逻辑回归比较结果。

结果

在 495 例患者中,55 例(11%)采用前路,440 例(89%)采用后路进行 THA。手术时间(100.24 与 109.42 分钟,p=0.070)、住院时间(2.19 与 2.67 天,p=0.072)、出院去向(p=0.151)和大量术后腹股沟疼痛(1.8%与 0.7%,p=0.966)在两组间无统计学差异。90 天再入院率(9.1%与 7.7%,p=0.823)和翻修率(0.0%与 3.0%,p=0.993)也无显著差异。具体来说,两组间不稳定的再入院率(p=0.993)和翻修率(p=0.998)无显著差异。我们发现两组之间从术前到 1 年随访的 HOOS、JR(p=0.425)、VR-12 PCS(p=0.718)和 VR-12 MCS(p=0.257)的改善差值评分无统计学差异。

结论

无论采用何种手术入路,植入 DM 结构后可能都能获得可比较的结果。前路和后路的腹股沟疼痛注射髂腰肌的发生率无显著差异。需要进一步研究以确定手术入路是否会影响接受 DM 植入物的患者的长期结果。

相似文献

3
Dual Mobility and Conventional Bearings Have Comparably Low Dislocation Rates for Anterior-Based Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2021 May;36(5):1695-1699. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.022. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
4
Less groin pain with dual-mobility bearings versus fixed bearings in total hip arthroplasty.
Hip Int. 2024 Jan;34(1):15-20. doi: 10.1177/11207000231158722. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
5
Selective Use of Dual-Mobility Did Not Significantly Reduce 90-Day Readmissions or Reoperations After Total Hip Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7S):S136-S141. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.008. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
6
Does Surgical Approach Affect Patient-reported Function After Primary THA?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Apr;474(4):971-81. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4639-5. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
7
Effect of Marital Status on Outcomes Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Dec;142(12):3651-3658. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03914-z. Epub 2021 May 25.
8
Prevalence of groin pain after primary dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty.
Hip Int. 2023 Mar;33(2):214-220. doi: 10.1177/11207000211039168. Epub 2021 Sep 19.
9
The Effect of Femoral Head Size on Groin Pain in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul;37(7S):S577-S581. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.020. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
10
Dual-mobility versus Fixed-bearing in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Outcome Comparison.
Hip Pelvis. 2022 Jun;34(2):96-105. doi: 10.5371/hp.2022.34.2.96. Epub 2022 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Dual mobility in primary total hip arthroplasty: A temptation from the devil or a blessing from above.
World J Orthop. 2024 Jun 18;15(6):512-519. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i6.512.
2
The Impact of Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgical Approach on Short-Term Postoperative and Patient-Reported Outcomes.
Cureus. 2023 Sep 18;15(9):e45456. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45456. eCollection 2023 Sep.

本文引用的文献

2
Use of Dual Mobility Acetabular Component and Anterior Approach in Patients With Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture.
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7):2530-2535. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.056. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
3
A survey of Hip Society surgeons concerning the direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty.
Bone Joint J. 2020 Jul;102-B(7_Supple_B):57-61. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2019-1493.R1.
4
Forgotten Joint Score in THA: Comparing the Direct Anterior Approach to Posterior Approach.
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Sep;35(9):2513-2517. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.074. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
5
Dual mobility in primary total hip arthroplasty: current concepts.
EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Nov 8;4(11):640-646. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180089. eCollection 2019 Nov.
6
Dual mobility total hip arthroplasty: should everyone get one?
EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Sep 3;4(9):541-547. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180045. eCollection 2019 Sep.
8
Dual-Mobility Constructs in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies.
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Mar;34(3):594-603. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.020. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
10
Mid-Term Outcomes of Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1494-1500. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验