• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择性使用双动式髋关节假体并未显著降低全髋关节置换术后 90 天内的再入院率或再手术率。

Selective Use of Dual-Mobility Did Not Significantly Reduce 90-Day Readmissions or Reoperations After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Hospital - Long Island, Mineola, New York.

NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7S):S136-S141. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.008. Epub 2023 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.008
PMID:37068565
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Selective use of dual mobility (DM) implants in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients at high dislocation risk has been proposed. However, evidence-based utilization thresholds have not been defined. We explored whether surgeon-specific rates of DM utilization correlate with rates of readmission and reoperation for dislocation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 14,818 primary THA procedures performed at a single institution between 2011 and 2021, including 14,310 fixed-bearing (FB) and 508 DM implant constructs. Outcomes including 90-day readmissions and reoperations were compared between patients who had FB and DM implants. Cases were then stratified into 3 groups based on the attending surgeon's rate of DM utilization (≤ 1, 1 to 10, or > 10%) and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

There were no differences in 90-day outcomes between FB and DM implant groups. Surgeon frequency of DM utilization ranged from 0% to 43%. There were 48 surgeons (73%) who used DM in ≤ 1% of cases, 11 (17%) in 1% to 10% of cases, and 7 (10%) in > 10% of cases. The 90-day rates of readmission (7.3% versus 7.6% versus 7.2%, P = .7) and reoperation (3.4% versus 3.9% versus 3.8%, P = .3), as well as readmission for instability (0.5% versus 0.6% versus 0.8%, P = .2) and reoperation for instability (0.5% versus 0.5% versus 0.8%, P = .6), did not statistically differ between cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Selective DM utilization did not reduce 90-day readmissions or reoperations following primary THA. Other dislocation-mitigation strategies (ie, surgical approach, computer navigation, robotic assistance, and large diameter FBs) may have masked any benefits of selective DM use.

摘要

背景

在髋关节置换术(THA)高脱位风险患者中,选择性使用双动(DM)植入物已被提出。然而,基于证据的使用阈值尚未确定。我们探讨了外科医生特异性 DM 使用率是否与脱位再入院和再手术率相关。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2011 年至 2021 年期间在一家机构进行的 14818 例初次 THA 手术,包括 14310 例固定轴承(FB)和 508 例 DM 植入物。比较了 FB 和 DM 植入物患者的 90 天再入院和再手术的结果。然后根据主治医生的 DM 使用率(≤1%、1%至 10%或>10%)将病例分为 3 组,比较结果。

结果

FB 和 DM 植入组在 90 天的结果无差异。外科医生 DM 使用频率从 0%到 43%不等。有 48 名外科医生(73%)在≤1%的病例中使用 DM,11 名(17%)在 1%至 10%的病例中使用,7 名(10%)在>10%的病例中使用。90 天的再入院率(7.3%比 7.6%比 7.2%,P=0.7)和再手术率(3.4%比 3.9%比 3.8%,P=0.3),以及不稳定再入院率(0.5%比 0.6%比 0.8%,P=0.2)和不稳定再手术率(0.5%比 0.5%比 0.8%,P=0.6)在不同组间无统计学差异。

结论

选择性 DM 使用并未降低初次 THA 后 90 天的再入院或再手术率。其他降低脱位风险的策略(即手术入路、计算机导航、机器人辅助和大直径 FB)可能掩盖了选择性 DM 使用的任何益处。

相似文献

1
Selective Use of Dual-Mobility Did Not Significantly Reduce 90-Day Readmissions or Reoperations After Total Hip Arthroplasty.选择性使用双动式髋关节假体并未显著降低全髋关节置换术后 90 天内的再入院率或再手术率。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7S):S136-S141. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.008. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
2
Dual Mobility Versus Fixed Bearing Implants in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Under 55 Years of Age.在 55 岁以下的患者中,初次全髋关节置换术中双动与固定衬垫假体的比较。
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2024 Sep;82(3):210-216.
3
High Rate of Early Intraprosthetic Dislocations of Dual Mobility Implants: A Single Surgeon Series of Primary and Revision Total Hip Replacements.双动假体早期内置脱位率高:一位外科医生的初次和翻修全髋关节置换术系列。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Nov;34(11):2793-2798. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
4
Dislocation Rates of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Prior Lumbar Spine Fusion and Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease With and Without Utilization of Dual Mobility Cups: An American Joint Replacement Registry Study.既往有腰椎融合术及腰椎退行性椎间盘疾病患者初次全髋关节置换术的脱位率:使用与未使用双动髋臼杯的情况——一项美国关节置换登记研究
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Mar 1;31(5):e271-e277. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00767. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
5
Revision total hip arthroplasty with a Kerboull plate: comparative outcomes using standard versus dual mobility cups.翻修全髋关节置换术与 Kerboull 钢板:使用标准与双动杯的比较结果。
Int Orthop. 2019 Oct;43(10):2245-2251. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4209-z. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
6
Dual-Mobility vs Fixed-Bearing Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Under 55 Years of Age: A Single-Institution, Matched-Cohort Analysis.55 岁以下患者中双动与固定衬垫全髋关节置换术的比较:单中心、配对队列分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3076-3081. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 11.
7
The use of dual mobility acetabular cups in total hip replacement reduces dislocation rates in hip dysplasia patients.双动髋臼杯在全髋关节置换术中的应用降低了髋关节发育不良患者的脱位率。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 16;13(1):22404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49703-z.
8
Dual Mobility and Conventional Bearings Have Comparably Low Dislocation Rates for Anterior-Based Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty.对于基于前路的全髋关节置换术,双动和传统轴承的脱位率相当低。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 May;36(5):1695-1699. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.022. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
9
Hip arthroplasty dislocation risk calculator: evaluation of one million primary implants and twenty-five thousand dislocations with deep learning artificial intelligence in a systematic review of reviews.髋关节置换脱位风险计算器:在一项系统综述中,利用深度学习人工智能对100万个初次植入物和2.5万例脱位进行评估
Int Orthop. 2023 Feb;47(2):557-571. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05644-2. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
10
Comparative study of total hip arthroplasties with dual mobility cups versus hemiarthroplasties in management of femoral neck fractures: Survival and dislocation rate at 5 years of follow-up?双动髋臼杯全髋关节置换术与半髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的比较研究:5年随访时的生存率和脱位率?
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Feb;108(1):103098. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103098. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Outcomes of Dual Mobility Cup versus Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Neurological Disorder with Femoral Neck Fractures.患有神经系统疾病的股骨颈骨折患者中双动杯与双极半髋关节置换术的比较结果
Hip Pelvis. 2025 Sep 1;37(3):213-222. doi: 10.5371/hp.2025.37.3.213.
2
Comparison of Outcomes in Dual-Mobility Versus Fixed-Bearing Implants in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.初次全髋关节置换术中双动型与固定承重型植入物的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2024 Jun 5;16(6):e61715. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61715. eCollection 2024 Jun.