Department of Global Health & Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Development Impact Evaluation Unit, World Bank, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Trop Med Int Health. 2022 Sep;27(9):795-802. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13799. Epub 2022 Aug 14.
The government of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) responded to COVID-19 with policy measures, such as business and school closures and distribution of vaccines, which rely on citizen compliance. In other settings, prior experience with effective government programmes has increased compliance with public health measures. We study the effect of a national water, sanitation, and hygiene programme on compliance with COVID-19 policies.
Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 332 communities were randomly assigned to the Villages et Écoles Assainis (VEA) programme or control. After COVID-19 reached DRC, individuals who owned phones (590/1312; 45%) were interviewed by phone three times between May 2020 and August 2021. Primary outcomes were COVID symptoms, non-COVID illness symptoms, child health, psychological well-being, and vaccine acceptance. Secondary outcomes included COVID-19 preventive behaviour and knowledge, and perceptions of governmental performance, including COVID response. All outcomes were self-reported. Outcomes were compared between treatment and control villages using linear models.
The VEA programme did not affect respondents' COVID symptoms (-0.11, 95% CI -0.55 to 0.33), non-COVID illnesses (-0.01, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.03), child health (0.07, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.33), psychological well-being (-0.05, 95% CI -0.35 to 0.24), or vaccine acceptance (-0.04, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.10). There was no effect on village-level COVID-19 preventive behaviour (0.03, 95% CI -0.23 to 0.29), COVID-19 knowledge (0.16, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.39), or trust in institutions.
Although the VEA programme increased access to improved water and sanitation, we found no evidence that it increased trust in government or compliance with COVID policies, or reduced illness.
刚果民主共和国(DRC)政府采取了政策措施应对 COVID-19,例如关闭企业和学校以及分发疫苗,这些措施依赖于公民的配合。在其他情况下,先前成功实施政府项目的经验提高了公众对公共卫生措施的配合程度。我们研究了国家水、环境卫生和个人卫生方案对 COVID-19 政策配合程度的影响。
在 COVID-19 大流行之前,332 个社区被随机分配到村庄和学校改善(VEA)方案或对照组。在 COVID-19 传播到 DRC 之后,2020 年 5 月至 2021 年 8 月期间,通过电话对拥有手机的 590/1312 名个人(占 45%)进行了三次电话访谈。主要结局是 COVID 症状、非 COVID 疾病症状、儿童健康、心理健康和疫苗接种接受情况。次要结局包括 COVID-19 预防行为和知识,以及对政府绩效的看法,包括 COVID 应对情况。所有结局均为自我报告。使用线性模型比较了治疗组和对照组村庄的结局。
VEA 方案并未影响受访者的 COVID 症状(-0.11,95%CI-0.55 至 0.33)、非 COVID 疾病(-0.01,95%CI-0.05 至 0.03)、儿童健康(0.07,95%CI-0.19 至 0.33)、心理健康(-0.05,95%CI-0.35 至 0.24)或疫苗接种接受率(-0.04,95%CI-0.19 至 0.10)。对村级 COVID-19 预防行为(0.03,95%CI-0.23 至 0.29)、COVID-19 知识(0.16,95%CI-0.08 至 0.39)或对机构的信任度均无影响。
尽管 VEA 方案增加了获得改良水和环境卫生设施的机会,但我们发现没有证据表明它提高了对政府的信任或对 COVID-19 政策的配合程度,也没有减轻疾病负担。