• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of a community-driven water, sanitation, and hygiene programme on COVID-19 symptoms, vaccine acceptance and non-COVID illnesses: A cluster-randomised controlled trial in rural Democratic Republic of Congo.社区驱动的水、环境卫生和个人卫生方案对 COVID-19 症状、疫苗接种接受情况和非 COVID 疾病的影响:刚果民主共和国农村地区的一项集群随机对照试验。
Trop Med Int Health. 2022 Sep;27(9):795-802. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13799. Epub 2022 Aug 14.
2
Effects of a community-driven water, sanitation and hygiene intervention on water and sanitation infrastructure, access, behaviour, and governance: a cluster-randomised controlled trial in rural Democratic Republic of Congo.一项由社区主导的水、环境卫生与个人卫生干预措施对水与环境卫生基础设施、获取情况、行为及治理的影响:刚果民主共和国农村地区的一项整群随机对照试验
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 May;6(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005030.
3
Formative research for the development of baby water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions for young children in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (REDUCE program).为在刚果民主共和国(减少幼童腹泻方案)为幼儿开展婴儿水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施而进行的形成性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 1;21(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10246-5.
4
Malaria rapid diagnostic test (HRP2/pLDH) positivity, incidence, care accessibility and impact of community WASH Action programme in DR Congo: mixed method study involving 625 households.疟疾快速诊断检测(HRP2/pLDH)阳性率、发病率、护理可及性以及刚果民主共和国社区 WASH 行动计划的影响:一项涉及 625 户家庭的混合方法研究。
Malar J. 2021 Feb 27;20(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03647-9.
5
Effect of a Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program on Handwashing with a Cleansing Agent among Diarrhea Patients and Attendants in Healthcare Facilities in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: A Randomized Pilot of the PICHA7 Program.刚果民主共和国医疗机构中腹泻患者及其护理人员使用清洁制剂洗手的水、环境卫生和个人卫生方案效果:PICHA7 方案的随机试点研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 May 22;21(6):659. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21060659.
6
Formative Research for the Development of Evidence-Based Targeted Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Interventions to Reduce Cholera in Hotspots in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Preventative Intervention for Cholera for 7 Days (PICHA7) Program.开发基于证据的有针对性的水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施以减少刚果民主共和国热点地区霍乱的形成性研究:霍乱 7 天预防干预(PICHA7)项目。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 27;19(19):12243. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912243.
7
COVID-19 Perception, Knowledge, and Preventive Practice: Comparison between South Korea, Ethiopia, and Democratic Republic of Congo.新型冠状病毒肺炎认知、知识和预防措施:韩国、埃塞俄比亚和刚果民主共和国的比较。
Afr J Reprod Health. 2020 Jun;24(s1):66-77. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2020/v24i2s.11.
8
Local perceptions of cholera and anticipated vaccine acceptance in Katanga province, Democratic Republic of Congo.刚果民主共和国加丹加省民众对霍乱的认知及对疫苗接种的预期
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 22;13:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-60.
9
Water, sanitation, and hygiene for control of trachoma in Ethiopia (WUHA): a two-arm, parallel-group, cluster-randomised trial.在埃塞俄比亚控制沙眼的水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WUHA):一项两臂、平行组、整群随机试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Jan;10(1):e87-e95. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00409-5.
10
Urban Water Access and Use in the Kivus: Evaluating Behavioural Outcomes Following an Integrated WASH Intervention in Goma and Bukavu, Democratic Republic of Congo.金沙萨和布卡武市(刚果民主共和国)综合水环境卫生干预后的行为结果评估:基伍地区城市水供应和使用情况
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 18;19(3):1065. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031065.

引用本文的文献

1
Community-led strategies for communicable disease prevention and management in low- and middle- income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review of health, social, and economic impact.低收入和中等收入国家中由社区主导的传染病预防与管理策略:对健康、社会和经济影响的混合方法系统评价
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 2;5(4):e0004304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004304. eCollection 2025.
2
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.物理干预措施以阻断或减少呼吸道病毒的传播。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6.

社区驱动的水、环境卫生和个人卫生方案对 COVID-19 症状、疫苗接种接受情况和非 COVID 疾病的影响:刚果民主共和国农村地区的一项集群随机对照试验。

Effects of a community-driven water, sanitation, and hygiene programme on COVID-19 symptoms, vaccine acceptance and non-COVID illnesses: A cluster-randomised controlled trial in rural Democratic Republic of Congo.

机构信息

Department of Global Health & Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Development Impact Evaluation Unit, World Bank, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

出版信息

Trop Med Int Health. 2022 Sep;27(9):795-802. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13799. Epub 2022 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1111/tmi.13799
PMID:35832019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9349788/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The government of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) responded to COVID-19 with policy measures, such as business and school closures and distribution of vaccines, which rely on citizen compliance. In other settings, prior experience with effective government programmes has increased compliance with public health measures. We study the effect of a national water, sanitation, and hygiene programme on compliance with COVID-19 policies.

METHODS

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 332 communities were randomly assigned to the Villages et Écoles Assainis (VEA) programme or control. After COVID-19 reached DRC, individuals who owned phones (590/1312; 45%) were interviewed by phone three times between May 2020 and August 2021. Primary outcomes were COVID symptoms, non-COVID illness symptoms, child health, psychological well-being, and vaccine acceptance. Secondary outcomes included COVID-19 preventive behaviour and knowledge, and perceptions of governmental performance, including COVID response. All outcomes were self-reported. Outcomes were compared between treatment and control villages using linear models.

RESULTS

The VEA programme did not affect respondents' COVID symptoms (-0.11, 95% CI -0.55 to 0.33), non-COVID illnesses (-0.01, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.03), child health (0.07, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.33), psychological well-being (-0.05, 95% CI -0.35 to 0.24), or vaccine acceptance (-0.04, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.10). There was no effect on village-level COVID-19 preventive behaviour (0.03, 95% CI -0.23 to 0.29), COVID-19 knowledge (0.16, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.39), or trust in institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the VEA programme increased access to improved water and sanitation, we found no evidence that it increased trust in government or compliance with COVID policies, or reduced illness.

摘要

目的

刚果民主共和国(DRC)政府采取了政策措施应对 COVID-19,例如关闭企业和学校以及分发疫苗,这些措施依赖于公民的配合。在其他情况下,先前成功实施政府项目的经验提高了公众对公共卫生措施的配合程度。我们研究了国家水、环境卫生和个人卫生方案对 COVID-19 政策配合程度的影响。

方法

在 COVID-19 大流行之前,332 个社区被随机分配到村庄和学校改善(VEA)方案或对照组。在 COVID-19 传播到 DRC 之后,2020 年 5 月至 2021 年 8 月期间,通过电话对拥有手机的 590/1312 名个人(占 45%)进行了三次电话访谈。主要结局是 COVID 症状、非 COVID 疾病症状、儿童健康、心理健康和疫苗接种接受情况。次要结局包括 COVID-19 预防行为和知识,以及对政府绩效的看法,包括 COVID 应对情况。所有结局均为自我报告。使用线性模型比较了治疗组和对照组村庄的结局。

结果

VEA 方案并未影响受访者的 COVID 症状(-0.11,95%CI-0.55 至 0.33)、非 COVID 疾病(-0.01,95%CI-0.05 至 0.03)、儿童健康(0.07,95%CI-0.19 至 0.33)、心理健康(-0.05,95%CI-0.35 至 0.24)或疫苗接种接受率(-0.04,95%CI-0.19 至 0.10)。对村级 COVID-19 预防行为(0.03,95%CI-0.23 至 0.29)、COVID-19 知识(0.16,95%CI-0.08 至 0.39)或对机构的信任度均无影响。

结论

尽管 VEA 方案增加了获得改良水和环境卫生设施的机会,但我们发现没有证据表明它提高了对政府的信任或对 COVID-19 政策的配合程度,也没有减轻疾病负担。