Teoh Ryan Liang Wei, Fong Pei Yuan, Cai Elijah Zhengyang, Yap Yan Lin, Hing Eileen Chor Hoong, Lee Han Jing, Nallathamby Vigneswaran, Ong Wei Chen, Lim Jane, Sundar Gangadhara, Lim Thiam Chye
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Arch Plast Surg. 2022 Apr 6;49(2):195-199. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1744407. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Nasolacrimal duct (NLD) damage is associated in the majority of type II and III naso-orbito-ethmoid (NOE) fractures. Our study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic NLD intubation in the setting of facial fractures, by comparing incidence of postoperative epiphora and wound infection. A retrospective matched control study was conducted on all patients with surgically treated facial fractures from 2008 to 2013 ( = 280) (IRB ref number: DSRB 2013/01198). Patients with the following fracture types were included: NOE ( = 16), frontal sinus ( = 2), Le Fort II/III ( = 8), and > 1 type ( = 48). All patients in this study were included with the intention to treat. The study group comprised patients who were intubated, while the control group patients were not intubated. Each group had 37 patients matched for age, gender, fracture type, and injury type. A single oculoplastic surgeon skilled in lacrimal surgery performed the procedure for all intubated patients. Patients with more severe and complex facial fractures were intubated with bicanalicular Crawford stents. Postoperative epiphora and infective complications (both facial wound and dacryocystitis) were assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. There was no significant difference in incidence of either postoperative epiphora ( = 0.152) or wound infection ( = 0.556) comparing both groups. Reduced incidence of postoperative epiphora in the study group is statistically not significant and does not support the need for prophylactic intubation. If radiographic evidence of NLD disruption or regurgitation seen on syringing on the NLD intraoperatively is present, intubation is safe and efficacious only if performed by an expert.
鼻泪管(NLD)损伤在大多数II型和III型鼻眶筛(NOE)骨折中都有发生。我们的研究旨在通过比较术后溢泪和伤口感染的发生率,探讨预防性鼻泪管插管在面部骨折治疗中的有效性和安全性。对2008年至2013年所有接受手术治疗的面部骨折患者进行了一项回顾性匹配对照研究(n = 280)(机构审查委员会参考编号:DSRB 2013/01198)。纳入的骨折类型如下:鼻眶筛骨折(n = 16)、额窦骨折(n = 2)、Le Fort II/III型骨折(n = 8)以及多种骨折类型(n = 48)。本研究中的所有患者均按意向性治疗纳入。研究组包括接受插管的患者,而对照组患者未接受插管。每组有37例患者,在年龄、性别、骨折类型和损伤类型方面进行了匹配。由一名擅长泪道手术的眼整形外科医生为所有接受插管的患者实施手术。对于更严重和复杂的面部骨折患者,插入双泪小管克劳福德支架。在术后1、3、6和12个月评估术后溢泪和感染并发症(包括面部伤口感染和泪囊炎)。比较两组,术后溢泪发生率(P = 0.152)或伤口感染发生率(P = 0.556)均无显著差异。研究组术后溢泪发生率的降低在统计学上无显著意义,不支持预防性插管的必要性。如果术中在鼻泪管冲洗时发现鼻泪管中断或反流的影像学证据,只有由专家进行插管才是安全有效的。