Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Epidemiology & Outcomes Research, IQVIA Real World Solutions, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec;57(12):1435-1442. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2090275. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
Project NORTH compared real-world clinical and economic outcomes in Swedish patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who switched from originator infliximab to its biosimilar.
Data from electronic medical records and Swedish national registries were linked. Switchers (patients switching from originator infliximab to its biosimilar between 1 April 2014, and 31 December 2017) and non-switchers (patients who received originator infliximab and did not switch to a biosimilar by 31 December 2017) were followed up until 31 October 2019.
Baseline concomitant medication use, disease duration, and inflammatory markers were lower among switchers than non-switchers. At 6 months, the proportion of patients with stable disease was higher among switchers than non-switchers (71/109 [65%] vs 54/107 [50%]; = .0385); differences were not significant in subsequent follow-ups. At 6 and 24 months, 98% and 93% of switchers, respectively, used concomitant medications versus 96% and 79% of non-switchers. Throughout the study, all-cause treatment discontinuation occurred in 74 (67%) switchers and 105 (95%) non-switchers. At 36-months, mean (SD) number of IBD-related in-patient care days was higher among non-switchers (2.95 [4.71]) than switchers (1.40 [4.20]), as were total medical costs (€16,740 vs €3,872).
No substantial differences in clinical outcomes or healthcare resource utilization were observed between switchers and non-switchers. Several analyses indicate that non-switchers might have more poorly controlled/severe disease than switchers at baseline. Overall, numerous difficulties might arise when executing a high-quality, real-world study, including possible selection bias for patients with better disease control for NMS, limiting the generalizability of the results.
与对照试验 NORTH 相比,本研究旨在观察瑞典炎症性肠病(IBD)患者在真实世界中的临床结局和经济结局,这些患者从英夫利昔单抗原研药转换为英夫利昔单抗生物类似药。
本研究将电子病历数据与瑞典国家登记处的数据进行了链接。转换组(2014 年 4 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间从英夫利昔单抗原研药转换为英夫利昔单抗生物类似药的患者)和未转换组(在 2017 年 12 月 31 日之前接受英夫利昔单抗原研药治疗且未转换为生物类似药的患者)在随访至 2019 年 10 月 31 日。
与未转换组相比,转换组患者在基线时的伴随药物使用、疾病持续时间和炎症标志物水平均较低。在 6 个月时,与未转换组相比,转换组患者疾病稳定的比例更高(71/109[65%]比 54/107[50%];=0.0385);但在随后的随访中,两组间差异无统计学意义。在 6 个月和 24 个月时,分别有 98%和 93%的转换组患者和 96%和 79%的未转换组患者使用伴随药物。在整个研究过程中,74 例(67%)转换组患者和 105 例(95%)未转换组患者均因各种原因停止治疗。在 36 个月时,未转换组患者的炎症性肠病相关住院天数(2.95[4.71])和总医疗费用(16740 欧元)均高于转换组(1.40[4.20]和 3872 欧元)。
转换组和未转换组之间的临床结局或卫生资源利用没有显著差异。多项分析表明,与转换组相比,未转换组患者在基线时的疾病控制较差/更严重。总体而言,当执行一项高质量的真实世界研究时,可能会出现许多困难,包括对 NMS 疾病控制较好的患者可能存在选择偏倚,从而限制了结果的普遍性。