• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Descriptive Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Tunnel Bone Grafting.描述性特征和接受前交叉韧带翻修术患者的结果,包括隧道骨移植和不包括隧道骨移植。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jul;50(9):2397-2409. doi: 10.1177/03635465221104470.
2
Effect of graft choice on the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Cohort.在多中心前交叉韧带翻修研究(MARS)队列中,移植物选择对前交叉韧带翻修重建结果的影响。
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2301-10. doi: 10.1177/0363546514549005.
3
Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.翻修前交叉韧带重建术后临床结果的手术预测因素
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep;45(11):2586-2594. doi: 10.1177/0363546517712952. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
4
Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.患者报告的 2 年后前交叉韧带重建翻修术后结局的预测因素。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Aug;47(10):2394-2401. doi: 10.1177/0363546519862279. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
5
Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft Combined With Modified Lemaire Technique Versus Hamstring Graft Combined With Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Clinical Comparative Matched Study With a Mean Follow-up of 5 Years From The SANTI Study Group.《使用改良 Lemaire 技术结合骨-髌腱-骨移植物与腘绳肌肌腱结合前外侧韧带重建对前交叉韧带重建的翻修:来自 SANTI 研究组的一项平均随访 5 年的临床对比配对研究》
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Feb;50(2):395-403. doi: 10.1177/03635465211061123. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
6
Relationship Between Sports Participation After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.膝关节前交叉韧带重建术后运动参与与 2 年患者报告结局测量的关系。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;47(9):2056-2066. doi: 10.1177/0363546519856348. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
7
Effect of High-Grade Preoperative Knee Laxity on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes.术前膝关节高度松弛对前交叉韧带重建结果的影响。
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3077-3082. doi: 10.1177/0363546516656835. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
8
Management of the Failed First Revision ACL Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes of Nonsurgical Management Versus Second Revision ACL Reconstruction From the SANTI Group.初次翻修失败的前交叉韧带重建的治疗管理:SANTI 研究组非手术治疗与二次翻修前交叉韧带重建的临床结果比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Oct;50(12):3236-3243. doi: 10.1177/03635465221119202. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
9
Influence of Preoperative Tunnel Widening On the Outcomes of a Single Stage-Only Approach to Every Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Analysis of 409 Consecutive Patients From the SANTI Study Group.单阶段翻修术治疗前交叉韧带重建术后翻修的疗效:SANTI 研究组 409 例连续患者的分析结果 术前隧道增宽的影响
Am J Sports Med. 2021 May;49(6):1431-1440. doi: 10.1177/0363546521996389. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
10
Outcomes After 1-Stage Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.一期与二期翻修前交叉韧带重建后的结果
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(8):1790-1798. doi: 10.1177/0363546517698684. Epub 2017 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Outcomes Between a Fixed-Loop Cortical Suspensory Device and Metal Interference Screw for Femoral Fixation of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Scandinavian Registry Study.固定环皮质悬吊装置与金属挤压螺钉用于前交叉韧带重建中骨-髌腱-骨移植物股骨固定的疗效比较:一项斯堪的纳维亚登记研究
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 May 22;13(5):23259671251335978. doi: 10.1177/23259671251335978. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Allogenous Bone Grafting Technique for Staged Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery.分期翻修前交叉韧带手术的同种异体骨移植技术
Video J Sports Med. 2023 Sep 28;3(5):26350254231200038. doi: 10.1177/26350254231200038. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct.
3
Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcome 6 Years After Revision ACL Reconstruction.翻修 ACL 重建后 6 年的临床结果的手术预测因子。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Nov;52(13):3286-3294. doi: 10.1177/03635465241288227.

本文引用的文献

1
Mechanisms of Bone Tunnel Enlargement Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建后骨隧道扩大的机制。
JBJS Rev. 2020 Apr;8(4):e0120. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00120.
2
Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.患者报告的 2 年后前交叉韧带重建翻修术后结局的预测因素。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Aug;47(10):2394-2401. doi: 10.1177/0363546519862279. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
3
Tibial tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A retrospective seven-year study evaluating the effects of initial graft tensioning and graft selection.前交叉韧带重建术后胫骨隧道增宽:一项评估初始移植物张紧和移植物选择效果的七年回顾性研究
Knee. 2018 Dec;25(6):1107-1114. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
4
Outcomes after bone grafting in patients with and without ACL revision surgery: a retrospective study.有或无前交叉韧带翻修手术患者骨移植后的结果:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 21;19(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2174-8.
5
Arthroscopic Delivery of Injectable Bone Graft for Staged Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.关节镜下注射式骨移植用于分期翻修前交叉韧带重建术
Arthrosc Tech. 2017 Nov 20;6(6):e2223-e2227. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.08.025. eCollection 2017 Dec.
6
Paradoxical tunnel enlargement after ACL reconstruction with hamstring autografts when using β-TCP containing interference screws for tibial aperture fixation- prospectively comparative study.使用含β-磷酸三钙的干涉螺钉进行胫骨隧道固定的自体腘绳肌肌腱前交叉韧带重建术后出现矛盾性隧道扩大——前瞻性对比研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Sep 16;18(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1757-0.
7
Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Bone Grafting Technique Using an Allograft Bone Matrix.两阶段翻修前交叉韧带重建:使用同种异体骨基质的骨移植技术
Arthrosc Tech. 2016 Feb 22;5(1):e189-95. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2015.10.021. eCollection 2016 Feb.
8
Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Changes After ACL Reconstruction: A Prospective 2-Year Longitudinal MRI Study.前交叉韧带重建术后胫股隧道的变化:一项为期2年的前瞻性纵向MRI研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2015 May;43(5):1147-56. doi: 10.1177/0363546515570461. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
9
Radiographic findings in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from the Mars cohort.来自火星队列的前交叉韧带翻修重建的影像学表现。
J Knee Surg. 2013 Aug;26(4):239-47. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1329717. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
10
Femoral tunnel malposition in ACL revision reconstruction.前交叉韧带翻修重建中股骨隧道位置不当
J Knee Surg. 2012 Nov;25(5):361-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299662. Epub 2012 May 3.

描述性特征和接受前交叉韧带翻修术患者的结果,包括隧道骨移植和不包括隧道骨移植。

Descriptive Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Tunnel Bone Grafting.

机构信息

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jul;50(9):2397-2409. doi: 10.1177/03635465221104470.

DOI:10.1177/03635465221104470
PMID:35833922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10326863/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lytic or malpositioned tunnels may require bone grafting during revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (rACLR) surgery. Patient characteristics and effects of grafting on outcomes after rACLR are not well described.

PURPOSE

To describe preoperative characteristics, intraoperative findings, and 2-year outcomes for patients with rACLR undergoing bone grafting procedures compared with patients with rACLR without grafting.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 1234 patients who underwent rACLR were prospectively enrolled between 2006 and 2011. Baseline revision and 2-year characteristics, surgical technique, pathology, treatment, and patient-reported outcome instruments (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Marx Activity Rating Scale [Marx]) were collected, as well as subsequent surgery information, if applicable. The chi-square and analysis of variance tests were used to compare group characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 159 patients (13%) underwent tunnel grafting-64 (5%) patients underwent 1-stage and 95 (8%) underwent 2-stage grafting. Grafting was isolated to the femur in 31 (2.5%) patients, the tibia in 40 (3%) patients, and combined in 88 patients (7%). Baseline KOOS Quality of Life (QoL) and Marx activity scores were significantly lower in the 2-stage group compared with the no bone grafting group (≤ .001). Patients who required 2-stage grafting had more previous ACLRs ( < .001) and were less likely to have received a bone-patellar tendon-bone or a soft tissue autograft at primary ACLR procedure (≤ .021) compared with the no bone grafting group. For current rACLR, patients undergoing either 1-stage or 2-stage bone grafting were more likely to receive a bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft (≤ .008) and less likely to receive a soft tissue autograft (≤ .003) compared with the no bone grafting group. At 2-year follow-up of 1052 (85%) patients, we found inferior outcomes in the 2-stage bone grafting group (IKDC score = 68; KOOS QoL score = 44; KOOS Sport/Recreation score = 65; and Marx activity score = 3) compared with the no bone grafting group (IKDC score = 77; KOOS QoL score = 63; KOOS Sport/Recreation score = 75; and Marx activity score = 7) (≤ .01). The 1-stage bone graft group did not significantly differ compared with the no bone grafting group.

CONCLUSION

Tunnel bone grafting was performed in 13% of our rACLR cohort, with 8% undergoing 2-stage surgery. Patients treated with 2-stage grafting had inferior baseline and 2-year patient-reported outcomes and activity levels compared with patients not undergoing bone grafting. Patients treated with 1-stage grafting had similar baseline and 2-year patient-reported outcomes and activity levels compared with patients not undergoing bone grafting.

摘要

背景

在翻修前交叉韧带重建(rACLR)手术中,可能需要对裂解或错位的隧道进行植骨。患者特征以及植骨对 rACLR 后结果的影响尚未得到很好的描述。

目的

描述接受 rACLR 且行植骨手术患者与未行植骨患者的术前特征、术中发现和 2 年随访结果。

研究设计

队列研究;证据等级,3 级。

方法

2006 年至 2011 年期间前瞻性纳入了 1234 例接受 rACLR 的患者。收集了基线翻修和 2 年随访的特征、手术技术、病理、治疗和患者报告的结局评估工具(国际膝关节文献委员会[IKDC]、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分[KOOS]、西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数和 Marx 活动评分量表[Marx]),以及后续的手术信息(如果适用)。采用卡方检验和方差分析比较组间特征。

结果

共有 159 例患者(13%)接受了隧道植骨-64 例(5%)患者行 1 期植骨,95 例(8%)患者行 2 期植骨。31 例(2.5%)患者仅行股骨植骨,40 例(3%)患者仅行胫骨植骨,88 例(7%)患者行联合植骨。2 期植骨组的基线 KOOS 生活质量(QoL)和 Marx 活动评分明显低于无植骨组(≤.001)。需要 2 期植骨的患者 ACLR 病史更多(<.001),并且初次 ACLR 时更不可能接受骨-髌腱-骨或自体组织移植物(≤.021)。对于当前 rACLR,行 1 期或 2 期植骨的患者更有可能接受骨-髌腱-骨同种异体移植物(≤.008),而不太可能接受自体组织移植物(≤.003)。在 1052 例(85%)患者的 2 年随访中,我们发现 2 期植骨组的结局较差(IKDC 评分=68;KOOS QoL 评分=44;KOOS 运动/娱乐评分=65;Marx 活动评分=3),与无植骨组(IKDC 评分=77;KOOS QoL 评分=63;KOOS 运动/娱乐评分=75;Marx 活动评分=7)相比(≤.01)。1 期植骨组与无植骨组相比,差异无统计学意义。

结论

在我们的 rACLR 队列中,有 13%的患者行隧道植骨,其中 8%的患者行 2 期手术。与未行植骨的患者相比,行 2 期植骨的患者基线和 2 年随访的患者报告结局和活动水平较差。行 1 期植骨的患者与未行植骨的患者相比,基线和 2 年随访的患者报告结局和活动水平相似。