Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, ERCOMER, Utrecht University.
School of Psychology, Speech and Hearing, University of Canterbury.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2023 Jun;29(2):414-424. doi: 10.1037/xap0000429. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
Tolerance of minority beliefs and practices is typically considered a critical ingredient for an equal and diverse society. Psychologically, people can use both intuitive and deliberative cognitive sources to make tolerance judgments. Following dual-process theories, this research uses survey experiments to manipulate intuitive versus deliberative thinking to examine whether deliberative thinking increases tolerance of minority practices. Across three studies using nationally representative samples of Dutch majority members ( = 1,811), we find that deliberative thinking increases tolerance, regardless of whether people deliberate over pragmatic or principled reasons for accepting contested minority practices and social changes. These findings are similar across a range of minority practices and robust across gender, age, educational level, and political orientation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
容忍少数群体的信仰和习俗通常被认为是建立平等和多元化社会的关键因素。从心理学角度来看,人们可以同时利用直觉和深思熟虑的认知来源来做出容忍判断。本研究遵循双过程理论,使用调查实验来操纵直觉与深思熟虑的思维,以检验深思熟虑的思维是否会增加对少数群体习俗的容忍度。通过对荷兰多数群体(n=1811)进行的三项具有全国代表性的样本研究,我们发现,无论人们是出于实际考虑还是原则性考虑来接受有争议的少数群体实践和社会变革,深思熟虑的思维都会增加容忍度。这些发现适用于一系列不同的少数群体实践,并且在性别、年龄、教育水平和政治取向方面具有稳健性。