Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen, 361005, China; Key Laboratory of Marine Ecological Conservation and Restoration, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen, 361005, China; Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Ecological Conservation and Restoration, Xiamen, 361005, China.
Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen, 361005, China.
Chemosphere. 2022 Nov;307(Pt 1):135653. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135653. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
The types and intensity of anthropogenic pressure in the same sea area may differ spatially and may change as time passes, but response of benthic biotic indices to different pressure is different, which makes it unreasonable to use the same benthic biotic indices in a large sea area. We provided a new way of thinking as to selecting benthic biotic indices according to pressure type. The study took six bays under eutrophication and sediment heavy metal pollution to different levels in Fujian coastal water, East China sea, as examples, analysed the response of five benthic biotic indices, namely AZTI marine biotic index (AMBI), multivariate AMBI (M-AMBI), Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H'), benthic opportunistic polychaetes amphipods (BOPA) and benthic polychaetes amphipods (BPA), to eutrophication factors and sediment heavy metal pollution factors firstly. The result indicated that AMBI well responded to dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP); M-AMBI responded soundly in the range of DIN >0.131 mg L and DIP >0.022 mg L and responded universally to heavy metals; H' responded to only Hg and Cd; BOPA has response to eutrophication condition of DIN >0.242 mg L; BPA had response to DIN, Cu and As. Then, suitable indices were selected based on the four pressure scenarios in the study area. AMBI was selected in no pressure scenario; M-AMBI was chosen under only eutrophication pressure and under dual pressure; H' was preferred in only heavy metal pressure scenario (mainly Hg pollution). At last, the density plot of the distribution of the selected indices in the evaluation grades under different pressure scenarios proved the proposal of selecting benthic biotic indices according to pressure types feasible. This study can offer some new insights into rapidly choosing indices to evaluate the coastal benthic ecological quality status.
该研究以东海福建近岸海域六个处于不同富营养化和重金属污染程度的海湾为例,分析了五种底栖生物指数(AZTI 海洋生物指数(AMBI)、多变量 AMBI(M-AMBI)、香农-威纳多样性指数(H')、底栖机会多毛类环节动物和底栖多毛类甲壳类动物(BOPA)和底栖多毛类甲壳类动物(BPA))对富营养化因子和沉积物重金属污染因子的响应。结果表明,AMBI 对溶解无机氮(DIN)和溶解无机磷(DIP)响应良好;M-AMBI 在 DIN >0.131 mg/L 和 DIP >0.022 mg/L 的范围内响应良好,对重金属普遍响应;H'仅对 Hg 和 Cd 有响应;BOPA 对 DIN >0.242 mg/L 的富营养化条件有响应;BPA 对 DIN、Cu 和 As 有响应。然后,根据研究区的四种压力情景选择合适的指数。在无压力情景下选择 AMBI;仅在富营养化压力和双重压力下选择 M-AMBI;仅在重金属压力情景(主要是 Hg 污染)下选择 H'。最后,不同压力情景下所选指数在评价等级中的分布密度图证明了根据压力类型选择底栖生物指数的建议是可行的。本研究可为快速选择指数评估沿海底栖生态质量状况提供一些新的思路。