From the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics (N.F.K., K.B., R.J.G., S.M.V.), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Department of Epidemiology (N.F.K., J.J.G.), Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Department of Health Policy and Management (M.L.B.), Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care (M.L.B.), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; and Department of Biostatistics (R.J.G.), Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Neurology. 2022 Sep 27;99(13):e1432-e1442. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200904. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
The concomitant use of prescription opioids and skeletal muscle relaxants has been associated with opioid overdose, but little data exist on the head-to-head safety of these drug combinations. The objective of this study was to compare the risk of opioid overdose among patients on long-term opioid therapy who concurrently initiate skeletal muscle relaxants.
We conducted an active comparator cohort study spanning 2000 to 2019 using healthcare utilization data from 4 US commercial and public insurance databases. Individuals were required to have at least 180 days of continuous enrollment and at least 90 days of continuous prescription opioid use immediately before and on the date of skeletal muscle relaxant initiation. Exposures were the concomitant use of prescription opioids and skeletal muscle relaxants, and the main outcome was the hazard ratio (HR) and bootstrapped 95% CI of opioid overdose resulting in an emergency department visit or hospitalization. The primary analysis quantified opioid overdose risk across 7 prescription opioid-skeletal muscle relaxant therapies and a negative control outcome (sepsis) to assess potential confounding by unmeasured illicit opioid use. Secondary analyses evaluated two-group and five-group comparisons in patients with similar baseline characteristics; individuals without previous recorded substance abuse; and subgroups stratified by baseline opioid dosage, benzodiazepine codispensing, and oxycodone or hydrocodone use.
Weighted HR of opioid overdose relative to cyclobenzaprine was 2.52 (95% CI 1.29-4.90) for baclofen; 1.64 (95% CI 0.81-3.34) for carisoprodol; 1.14 (95% CI 0.53-2.46) for chlorzoxazone/orphenadrine; 0.46 (95% CI 0.17-1.24) for metaxalone; 1.00 (95% CI 0.45-2.20) for methocarbamol; and 1.07 (95% CI 0.49-2.33) for tizanidine in the 30-day intention-to-treat analysis. Findings were similar in the as-treated analysis, 2-group and 5-group comparisons, and patients without previous recorded substance abuse. None of the therapies relative to cyclobenzaprine were associated with sepsis, and no subgroups indicated an increased risk of opioid overdose.
Concomitant use of prescription opioids and baclofen relative to cyclobenzaprine is associated with opioid overdose. Clinical interventions may focus on prescribing alternatives in the same drug class or providing access to opioid antagonists if treatment with both medications is necessary for pain management.
处方类阿片与骨骼肌松弛剂联合使用与阿片类药物过量有关,但关于这些药物联合使用的安全性的相关数据较少。本研究的目的是比较长期使用阿片类药物的患者同时开始使用骨骼肌松弛剂后阿片类药物过量的风险。
我们开展了一项基于 2000 年至 2019 年期间的医疗保健利用数据的活性对照队列研究,数据来源于美国 4 家商业和公共保险数据库。要求患者至少有 180 天的连续参保和至少 90 天的连续处方类阿片使用,在此之前和开始使用骨骼肌松弛剂当日。暴露因素是同时使用处方类阿片和骨骼肌松弛剂,主要结局是因阿片类药物过量导致急诊就诊或住院的风险比(hazard ratio,HR)和 bootstrap 95%置信区间(confidence interval,CI)。主要分析比较了 7 种处方类阿片-骨骼肌松弛剂治疗方案和阴性对照结局(脓毒症)的阿片类药物过量风险,以评估潜在的未测量非法阿片类药物使用导致的混杂。次要分析评估了两组和五组比较,在具有相似基线特征的患者中;在没有既往记录的药物滥用的患者中;以及在基线阿片类药物剂量、苯二氮䓬类药物共调配以及羟考酮或氢可酮使用方面进行分层的亚组中。
与环苯扎林相比,30 天意向治疗分析中,接受巴氯芬、卡立普多、氯唑沙宗/奥芬那君、美索巴莫、甲氯芬那酸、美西律和替扎尼定治疗的患者发生阿片类药物过量的 HR 分别为 2.52(95%CI 1.29-4.90)、1.64(95%CI 0.81-3.34)、1.14(95%CI 0.53-2.46)、0.46(95%CI 0.17-1.24)、1.00(95%CI 0.45-2.20)、1.07(95%CI 0.49-2.33)。在实际治疗分析中,以及在两组和五组比较和无既往记录药物滥用的患者中,结果相似。与环苯扎林相比,这些治疗方案均与脓毒症无关,且没有亚组表明阿片类药物过量风险增加。
与环苯扎林相比,处方类阿片与巴氯芬联合使用与阿片类药物过量有关。临床干预措施可能侧重于在同一药物类别中选择替代药物,或者在需要同时使用两种药物进行疼痛管理的情况下,提供阿片类拮抗剂。