Radiochemistry Department, Faculty of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Sergeev Institute of Environmental Geoscience, RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(59):88606-88617. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21919-y. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
This article delves into the factors that may influence radon flux, such as soil properties and weather conditions, on the example of two experimental locations with different soil compositions, composed primarily of clay and sand, respectively. The experimental location with sandy soil was previously observed to have anomalously high radon flux levels. Radon monitoring was performed routinely, approximately at the same time of day and in parallel on both of these locations to exclude the influence of diurnal variations. The results show that radon transport in these locations differs in mechanism: Location with clay soil has diffusive radon transport, with an average radon flux density of 37.4 ± 24.9 mBq m s and a range of 0.3-167.8 mBq m s, while the location with sandy soil has convective radon transport with an average radon flux density of 93.6 ± 51.2 mBq m s and a range of 9.8-302.2 mBq m s. This corresponds to about 8.3% of RFD measurements on site with clay soils exceeding the national reference level of 80 mBq m s and 45.6% exceeding them on the site with sandy soils. Average radon flux density values were then compared to meteorological variables using Pearson correlation analysis with Student's t-test. It was observed that radon flux density correlates the most with ambient air temperature both for diffusive and convective radon transport mechanisms, while a weaker inverse correlation is observed with atmospheric precipitation and wind speed for the diffusive mode of radon transport, but not for the convective. Radon activity concentration in soil air correlates with the radon flux density and air temperature in the case of convective radon transport, but does not correlate in the case of diffusive transport.
本文以两个具有不同土壤组成的实验地点为例,研究了影响氡通量的因素,例如土壤特性和天气条件。其中一个实验地点的土壤主要由粘土组成,另一个实验地点的土壤主要由沙子组成。之前在沙质土壤的实验地点观察到异常高的氡通量水平。在这两个地点,大约在同一时间、平行地进行了常规的氡监测,以排除昼夜变化的影响。结果表明,这些地点的氡迁移机制不同:具有粘土土壤的地点具有扩散氡迁移,平均氡通量密度为 37.4±24.9 mBq m s,范围为 0.3-167.8 mBq m s,而具有沙质土壤的地点具有对流氡迁移,平均氡通量密度为 93.6±51.2 mBq m s,范围为 9.8-302.2 mBq m s。这对应于粘土土壤地点上大约 8.3%的 RFD 测量值超过国家参考水平 80 mBq m s,而在沙质土壤地点上则有 45.6%超过该水平。然后使用 Pearson 相关分析和学生 t 检验将平均氡通量密度值与气象变量进行比较。结果表明,无论是对于扩散还是对流氡迁移机制,氡通量密度与环境空气温度的相关性最大,而对于扩散模式的氡迁移,与大气降水和风速呈较弱的负相关,但对流则不然。在对流氡迁移的情况下,土壤空气中的氡活度浓度与氡通量密度和空气温度相关,但在扩散迁移的情况下则不相关。