Suppr超能文献

妊娠期呕吐——一项关于EMPOWER内部预试验招募失败的定性研究

Emesis in pregnancy - a qualitative study on trial recruitment failure from the EMPOWER internal pilot.

作者信息

Lie Mabel Leng Sim, McParlin Catherine, McColl Elaine, Graham Ruth H, Robson Stephen C

机构信息

Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Jul 14;8(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01093-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As part of the internal pilot of the EMPOWER trial investigating the second-line antiemetic therapies in severe emesis in pregnancy ( https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16924692 ), a qualitative study of women's views was carried out, to improve our understanding of why women did, or did not, consent to participation in the trial. Interviews were also conducted with site research staff, to broaden our analysis and explore other factors affecting recruitment.

METHODS

The sample comprised women who accepted or declined trial participation (n=21) and site research staff (n=22). A structured topic guide was used, in four email interviews and 17 telephone interviews with women, and semi-structured telephone interviews were carried out with staff. Of the women interviewed, seven had declined trial participation, and of the staff interviewed, 16 were research midwives/research nurses and six were principal investigators. All transcripts were checked for accuracy, anonymised and entered into NVIVO12 for indexing and retrieval. Data was analysed using a reflexive thematic analytic approach. In total, 72 codes were generated from the thematic analysis, and 36 from each sample group.

RESULTS

Three key themes based on all the interviews were (a) the diversity of recruitment pathways and boundaries of care, (b) the impact of trial complexity on recruitment and staff morale and (c) the ethics of caring for a patient with emesis. Ethical issues discussed included the use of double dummy and time to treat, particularly those suffering severely from the effects of nausea and vomiting. To illustrate these themes, staff perspectives are given more prominence.

CONCLUSIONS

The main reason the trial was stopped related to the high proportion of women ineligible for recruitment due to prior treatment with study drug(s) because of unanticipated changes in clinical practice. The qualitative results also demonstrate the impact of the trial on women and staff and highlight how the diversity of referral pathways, boundaries of care and the complexity of the trial and protocol resulted in additional barriers to successful trial recruitment. Qualitative work in pilot and feasibility studies of a clinical trial is recommended, to evaluate whether recruitment strategies remain viable in unanticipated contexts.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration number ISRCTN16924692 . Date: 08/01/2018.

摘要

背景

作为“增强力量”试验内部试点的一部分,该试验旨在研究妊娠剧吐的二线止吐疗法(https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16924692),开展了一项关于女性观点的定性研究,以增进我们对女性同意或不同意参与试验原因的理解。还对研究点的工作人员进行了访谈,以拓宽我们的分析范围并探究影响招募的其他因素。

方法

样本包括接受或拒绝参与试验的女性(n = 21)以及研究点工作人员(n = 22)。使用了结构化主题指南,通过4次电子邮件访谈和17次电话访谈女性,并对工作人员进行了半结构化电话访谈。在接受访谈的女性中,7人拒绝参与试验;在接受访谈的工作人员中,16人为研究助产士/研究护士,6人为主要研究者。所有访谈记录均经过准确性核对、匿名处理,并录入NVIVO12进行索引和检索。采用反思性主题分析方法对数据进行分析。主题分析共生成72个编码,每个样本组各36个。

结果

基于所有访谈得出三个关键主题:(a)招募途径的多样性和护理界限;(b)试验复杂性对招募和工作人员士气的影响;(c)护理妊娠剧吐患者的伦理问题。讨论的伦理问题包括使用双盲对照和治疗时间,尤其是对那些因恶心和呕吐影响严重的患者。为说明这些主题,更突出了工作人员的观点。

结论

试验停止的主要原因是由于临床实践中出现意外变化,因先前接受过研究药物治疗而不符合招募条件的女性比例过高。定性研究结果还表明了试验对女性和工作人员的影响,并突出了转诊途径的多样性、护理界限以及试验和方案的复杂性如何给成功招募试验对象带来额外障碍。建议在临床试验的试点和可行性研究中开展定性研究,以评估在意外情况下招募策略是否仍然可行。

试验注册

试验注册号ISRCTN16924692。日期:2018年1月8日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13b9/9281005/4b3c203136c7/40814_2022_1093_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验