Suppr超能文献

开发一款用于报告药物不良反应的移动健康应用程序——患者及其全科医生的前提条件、可能功能的评估以及障碍

Developing a Mobile Health Application to Communicate Adverse Drug Reactions - Preconditions, Assessment of Possible Functionalities and Barriers for Patients and Their General Practitioners.

作者信息

Wakob Ines, Schmid Gordian Lukas, Nöhring Ingo, Elze Romy, Sultzer Ralf, Frese Thomas, Schiek Susanne, Bertsche Thilo

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Drug Safety Center, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Leipzig and Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Jul 8;15:1445-1455. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S369625. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Mobile health (mHealth) applications offer structured and timely communication between patients and general practitioners (GPs) about adverse drug reactions (ADR). Preconditions, functionalities and barriers should be studied to ensure safe implementation.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional questionnaire survey addressing (i) preconditions, (ii) users' assessment of functionalities and (iii) barriers to mHealth managing ADR communication.

RESULTS

A total of 480 patients and 31 GPs completed the survey. (i) A total of 269 (56%) patients and 13 (42%) GPs were willing to use mHealth for ADR communication. Willingness was negatively correlated with age for both patients (r = -0.231; p < 0.001) and GPs (r = -0.558; p = 0.002). (ii) Most useful functionalities mentioned by patients (>60%) included "Rapid feedback on urgency of face-to-face consultations." GPs valued information on "Patient's difficulties in medication administration." (iii) In free-text answers, the barrier reported most frequently by patients was "preferred personal GP contact" (6%), whereas GPs claimed, "uncomplicated use with low expenditure of time and personnel" (19%).

CONCLUSION

Older patients and GPs mainly show reservations about mHealth for ADR communication but recognize possible benefits. mHealth implementation should avoid a negative effect on GPs' time budgets; the primary goal should not be to reduce the number of GP-patient contacts but to optimize them.

摘要

目的

移动健康(mHealth)应用程序为患者与全科医生(GP)就药物不良反应(ADR)提供了结构化且及时的沟通。应研究其先决条件、功能及障碍,以确保安全实施。

方法

我们开展了一项横断面问卷调查,涉及(i)先决条件,(ii)用户对功能的评估,以及(iii)mHealth管理ADR沟通的障碍。

结果

共有480名患者和31名全科医生完成了调查。(i)共有269名(56%)患者和13名(42%)全科医生愿意使用mHealth进行ADR沟通。患者和全科医生的意愿与年龄均呈负相关(患者:r = -0.231;p < 0.001;全科医生:r = -0.558;p = 0.002)。(ii)患者提到的最有用功能(>60%)包括“面对面咨询紧迫性的快速反馈”。全科医生重视“患者用药困难”方面的信息。(iii)在自由文本回答中,患者最常报告的障碍是“更喜欢与个人全科医生联系”(6%),而全科医生声称是“使用简单,时间和人力成本低”(19%)。

结论

老年患者和全科医生对mHealth用于ADR沟通主要持保留态度,但认识到可能的益处。mHealth的实施应避免对全科医生的时间预算产生负面影响;主要目标不应是减少全科医生与患者的接触次数,而应是优化这些接触。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1e/9275429/2ef1630c6d3b/JMDH-15-1445-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验