Institute and Outpatients Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Building West 37, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Institute and Outpatients Clinic of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Qual Life Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):3279-3286. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02703-2. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
The first aim of this qualitative study was to identify general practitioners' (GPs') views on depression screening combined with GP-targeted feedback in primary care. The second aim was to determine the needs and preferences of GPs with respect to GP-targeted feedback to enhance the efficacy of depression screening.
A semistructured qualitative interview was conducted with officially registered GPs in Hamburg (Germany). Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. An inductive approach was used to code the transcripts.
Nine GPs (27 to 70 years; 5 male) from Hamburg, Germany, participated. Regarding depression screening combined with GP-targeted feedback, five thematic groups were identified: application of screening; screening and patient-physician relationships; GPs' attitudes towards screening; benefits and concerns related to screening; and GPs' needs and preferences regarding feedback. While the negative aspects of screening can be described in rather general terms (e.g., screening determines the mental health competence, screening threatens the doctor-patient relationship, revealing questions harm the patients), its advantages were very specific (e.g., promoting the identification of undetected cases, relief of the daily workload, wider communication channel to reach more patients). Standardized GP-targeted feedback of the screening results was perceived as helpful and purposeful. GPs preferred feedback materials that eased their clinical workload (e.g., short text with visuals, pictures, or images).
Addressing GPs' needs is essential when implementing depression screening tools in clinical practice. To overcome prejudices and enhance the efficacy of screening, further education for GPs on the purpose and application on depression screening may be needed. Standardized GP-targeted feedback in combination with depression screening could be the missing link to improve the detection of depression in primary care.
本定性研究的首要目的是确定全科医生(GP)对初级保健中抑郁筛查与以 GP 为目标的反馈相结合的看法。第二个目的是确定 GP 对以 GP 为目标的反馈的需求和偏好,以提高抑郁筛查的效果。
对德国汉堡的注册全科医生进行了半结构化定性访谈。访谈进行了录音,并逐字转录。采用归纳法对记录进行编码。
来自德国汉堡的 9 名全科医生(27 至 70 岁;5 名男性)参与了研究。关于抑郁筛查与以 GP 为目标的反馈,确定了五个主题组:应用筛查;筛查与医患关系;GP 对筛查的态度;与筛查相关的益处和顾虑;以及 GP 对反馈的需求和偏好。虽然筛查的负面方面可以用相当一般的术语来描述(例如,筛查决定心理健康能力,筛查威胁医患关系,暴露问题伤害患者),但其优势非常具体(例如,促进未确诊病例的识别,减轻日常工作量,拓宽与更多患者沟通的渠道)。以 GP 为目标的标准化反馈对筛查结果被认为是有帮助和有目的的。GP 更喜欢可以减轻其临床工作量的反馈材料(例如,带有视觉效果、图片或图像的简短文本)。
在将抑郁筛查工具应用于临床实践时,满足 GP 的需求至关重要。为了克服偏见并提高筛查的效果,可能需要对 GP 进行有关抑郁筛查目的和应用的进一步教育。结合抑郁筛查的以 GP 为目标的标准化反馈可能是改善初级保健中抑郁检测的缺失环节。