• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝胰胆外科手术中的术中出血量估计——相关但未报告,也未标准化:系统评价和全球快照调查结果。

Intraoperative Blood Loss Estimation in Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery- Relevant, Not Reported, Not Standardized: Results From a Systematic Review and a Worldwide Snapshot Survey.

机构信息

Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.

Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2023 Apr 1;277(4):e849-e855. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005536. Epub 2022 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005536
PMID:35837979
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of the current practice of intraoperative blood loss (BL) estimation in hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery.

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative BL is a major quality marker in HPB surgery and a predictor of perioperative outcomes. However, the method for BL estimation is not standardized.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed of original studies published between 2006 and 2021 reporting the intraoperative BL of patients undergoing pancreatic or hepatic resections. A web-based snapshot survey was distributed globally to all members of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA).

RESULTS

A total of 806 studies were included; 480 (60%) had BL as their primary outcome, and 105 (13%) had BL as their secondary outcome. However, 669 (83%) did not specify how BL estimation was performed, and 9 different methods were found among the remaining 136 (17%) studies.The survey was completed by 252 surgeons. Most of the responders (94%) declared that they systematically performed BL estimation and considered BL predictive of postoperative complications after pancreatic (73%) and liver (74%) resection. All methods previously identified in the literature were used by responders with different frequencies. A calculation based on suction fluid amounts, operative gauze weight, and irrigation was the most used method in the literature (7%) and among responders (51%). Most responders (83%) felt that BL estimation in HPB surgery needs improved standardization.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardization of intraoperative BL estimation is urgently needed in HPB surgery to ensure the consistency of reporting and reproducibility.

摘要

目的

概述肝胆胰外科手术中目前术中失血量(BL)估计的实践情况。

背景

术中 BL 是肝胆胰外科手术中的一个主要质量指标,也是围手术期结果的预测因素。然而,BL 估计的方法尚未标准化。

方法

对 2006 年至 2021 年间发表的报告胰腺或肝切除术患者术中 BL 的原始研究进行了系统回顾。全球范围内向国际肝胆胰协会(IHPBA)的所有成员分发了基于网络的快照调查。

结果

共纳入 806 项研究;480 项(60%)将 BL 作为主要结局,105 项(13%)将 BL 作为次要结局。然而,669 项(83%)未具体说明 BL 估计是如何进行的,在其余 136 项(17%)研究中发现了 9 种不同的方法。该调查由 252 名外科医生完成。大多数应答者(94%)表示他们系统地进行 BL 估计,并认为 BL 可预测胰腺(73%)和肝脏(74%)切除术后的术后并发症。应答者使用了文献中先前确定的所有方法,但使用频率不同。基于吸液量、手术纱布重量和冲洗液的计算是文献中(7%)和应答者中(51%)最常用的方法。大多数应答者(83%)认为肝胆胰外科手术中的 BL 估计需要改进标准化。

结论

肝胆胰外科手术中迫切需要 BL 估计的标准化,以确保报告的一致性和可重复性。

相似文献

1
Intraoperative Blood Loss Estimation in Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery- Relevant, Not Reported, Not Standardized: Results From a Systematic Review and a Worldwide Snapshot Survey.肝胰胆外科手术中的术中出血量估计——相关但未报告,也未标准化:系统评价和全球快照调查结果。
Ann Surg. 2023 Apr 1;277(4):e849-e855. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005536. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
2
Surgeons' assessment versus risk models for predicting complications of hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery (HPB-RISC): a multicenter prospective cohort study.外科医生评估与风险模型预测肝胰胆手术并发症的比较(HPB-RISC):一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
HPB (Oxford). 2018 Sep;20(9):809-814. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.02.635. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
3
International Hepato-Pancreato-Billiary Association (IHPBA) registry study on COVID-19 infections in HPB surgery patients.国际肝胆胰协会(IHPBA)关于肝胰胆外科患者 COVID-19 感染的注册研究。
HPB (Oxford). 2024 Jan;26(1):102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.08.007. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
4
Hepato-pancreato-biliary training in general surgery residency: is it enough for the real world?普通外科住院医师培训中的肝胆胰外科培训:对现实世界来说足够吗?
Am J Surg. 2009 Mar;197(3):291-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.10.005.
5
Advances in hepato-pancreato biliary surgery.肝胆胰外科学进展。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Aug;5(4):457-60. doi: 10.1586/egh.11.39.
6
Smartphone Application as an Education Platform in Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery.智能手机应用程序作为肝胆胰外科的教育平台
Surg Innov. 2019 Oct;26(5):613-620. doi: 10.1177/1553350619848210. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
Workforce projections for hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery.肝胰胆外科的劳动力预测
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Apr;206(4):678-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.11.016. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
8
Evaluation of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) fellowships: an international survey of programme directors.肝胰胆(HPB)研究员职位评估:项目主任的国际调查。
HPB (Oxford). 2011 Apr;13(4):279-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00283.x. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
9
Perioperative complications and the cost of rescue or failure to rescue in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery.肝胰胆手术的围手术期并发症及挽救或未挽救的成本。
HPB (Oxford). 2018 Sep;20(9):854-864. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.03.010. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
10
Percutaneous management of postoperative Bile leak after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: a multi-center experience.肝胰胆手术后经皮处理术后胆漏:一项多中心经验
HPB (Oxford). 2021 Oct;23(10):1518-1524. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Call for participation in a multicenter study: Intraoperative blood loss - Towards a standardized and objective recording method.多中心研究参与邀请:术中失血——迈向标准化和客观的记录方法
Surg Open Sci. 2025 Aug 5;27:110-112. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2025.07.007. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Robotic versus open hepatectomy for large(≥ 5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma: A large volume center, propensity score matched study.机器人辅助与开放性肝切除术治疗大型(≥5厘米)肝细胞癌:一项大容量中心的倾向评分匹配研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul 31;23(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03914-y.
3
Robotic vs laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: multicentric propensity-score matched analysis of surgical and oncologic outcomes in 647 patients.
肝细胞癌的机器人手术与腹腔镜手术切除:647例患者手术及肿瘤学结局的多中心倾向评分匹配分析
Updates Surg. 2025 Jul 20. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02293-z.
4
Beyond estimates: optimizing surgical strategies through accurate blood loss measurement.超越估计:通过精确测量失血量优化手术策略。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2025 Jun 1;14(3):464-466. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-2025-75. Epub 2025 May 26.
5
Comparative study of the refined mini-pterional approach with reduced skin incision versus the conventional mini-pterional approach for clipping unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a propensity score-matched analysis.改良小翼点入路缩小皮肤切口与传统小翼点入路夹闭未破裂大脑中动脉动脉瘤的对比研究:倾向评分匹配分析
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Apr 26;48(1):388. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03547-5.
6
The conventional method of blood-loss calculation can underestimate true blood loss during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a dual-institute experience.传统的失血计算方法可能会低估腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术期间的真实失血量:一项双机构经验。
Surg Today. 2025 Apr 15. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03040-y.
7
Calculation methods for intraoperative blood loss: a literature review.术中失血的计算方法:文献综述
BMC Surg. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02699-3.
8
Estimation of intraoperative blood loss in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a Delphi consensus process of the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA).肝胰胆外科手术中术中失血量的评估:欧洲-非洲肝胰胆协会(E-AHPBA)的德尔菲共识过程
Br J Surg. 2024 Oct 1;111(10). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae256.
9
Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases after portal vein embolization: international multicentre study.经门静脉栓塞化疗后腹腔镜与开腹右半肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的国际多中心研究。
Br J Surg. 2024 Aug 2;111(8). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae181.
10
A Comparison of Preoperative Predictive Scoring Systems for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy Based on a Single-Center Analysis.基于单中心分析的胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘术前预测评分系统比较
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 3;13(11):3286. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113286.