Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023 Feb 1;18(2):245-255. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04000422. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
Intermittent hemodialysis remains a cornerstone of extracorporeal KRT in the intensive care unit, either as a first-line therapy for AKI or a second-line therapy when patients transition from a continuous or prolonged intermittent therapy. Intermittent hemodialysis is usually provided 3 days per week in this setting on the basis that no clinical benefits have been demonstrated with more frequent hemodialysis. This should not detract from the importance of continually assessing and refining the hemodialysis prescription (including the need for extra treatments) according to dynamic changes in extracellular volume and other parameters, and ensuring that an adequate dose of hemodialysis is being delivered to the patient. Compared with other KRT modalities, the cardinal challenge encountered during intermittent hemodialysis is hemodynamic instability. This phenomenon occurs when reductions in intravascular volume, as a consequence of ultrafiltration and/or osmotic shifts, outpace compensatory plasma refilling from the extravascular space. Myocardial stunning, triggered by intermittent hemodialysis, and independent of ultrafiltration, may also contribute. The hemodynamic effect of intermittent hemodialysis is likely magnified in patients who are critically ill due to an inability to mount sufficient compensatory physiologic responses in the context of multiorgan dysfunction. Of the many interventions that have undergone testing to mitigate hemodynamic instability related to KRT, the best evidence exists for cooling the dialysate and raising the dialysate sodium concentration. Unfortunately, the evidence supporting routine use of these and other interventions is weak owing to poor study quality and limited sample sizes. Intermittent hemodialysis will continue to be an important and commonly used KRT modality for AKI in patients with critical illness, especially in jurisdictions where resources are limited. There is an urgent need to harmonize the definition of hemodynamic instability related to KRT in clinical trials and robustly test strategies to combat it in this vulnerable patient population.
间歇性血液透析仍然是重症监护室体外肾脏替代治疗的基石,无论是作为急性肾损伤的一线治疗,还是在患者从连续或延长的间歇性治疗转为二线治疗时使用。在这种情况下,间歇性血液透析通常每周进行 3 天,因为没有证据表明更频繁的血液透析会带来临床益处。这不应削弱根据细胞外液和其他参数的动态变化不断评估和调整血液透析方案(包括额外治疗的需求)的重要性,并确保向患者提供足够剂量的血液透析。与其他肾脏替代治疗模式相比,间歇性血液透析过程中遇到的主要挑战是血液动力学不稳定。这种现象发生在由于超滤和/或渗透转移导致血管内体积减少超过从血管外空间补充补偿性血浆时。间歇性血液透析引起的心肌顿抑,也可能与超滤无关,也可能导致这种现象发生。由于多器官功能障碍,危重患者无法充分代偿生理反应,因此间歇性血液透析的血液动力学效应可能会放大。在已经进行了许多干预措施以减轻与肾脏替代治疗相关的血液动力学不稳定的研究中,证据最充分的是冷却透析液和提高透析液钠浓度。不幸的是,由于研究质量差和样本量有限,支持常规使用这些干预措施和其他干预措施的证据较弱。在资源有限的司法管辖区,间歇性血液透析将继续成为危重患者急性肾损伤的一种重要且常用的肾脏替代治疗模式。迫切需要在临床试验中协调与肾脏替代治疗相关的血液动力学不稳定的定义,并在这一脆弱的患者群体中有力地测试对抗这种不稳定的策略。