• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆囊切除术后胆管损伤修复后晚期失败的再次手术治疗结果。

Outcome of reoperative surgery for late failure of postcholecystectomy bile duct injury repair.

机构信息

Division of Surgical Gastroenterology, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, 244 A. J. C. Bose Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700020, India.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2022 Oct;74(5):1543-1550. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01325-2. Epub 2022 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1007/s13304-022-01325-2
PMID:35840791
Abstract

The aim of the study is to report the outcomes of reoperative surgery for late failure of postcholecystectomy bile duct injury (BDI) repair. All the patients, who underwent a reoperative surgery for late failure of postcholecystectomy BDI repair at our institution between August 2007 and July 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. Of the total 262 patients of BDI repair, 66 underwent reoperative surgery for late failure. Median duration between last attempt repair and the onset of recurrent symptoms was 18 months. Eighty-five percent of patients with failed repair became symptomatic within 5 years of attempt repair. The most common type of BDI was E3. All the patients underwent Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Twenty-nine postoperative complications developed in 23 (35%) patients. Postoperative mortality was 1.5%. Median postoperative hospital stay was 9 (5-61) days. Over a median follow-up of 80 (12-150) months, 5.2% (3/58) of patients developed clinically relevant anastomotic stricture. Three patients with secondary biliary cirrhosis died in the follow-up period due to decompensated liver disease. Overall, excellent or good long-term outcome was achieved in 83% (48/58) of patients which was significantly less satisfactory than primary repair patients (82.8% vs 92.7%, p = 0.039). Reoperative surgery is safe in patients with failed repair after postcholecystectomy BDI and good long-term clinical success can be achieved in most of the patients. The long-term results were less satisfactory in failed-repair group than those who underwent primary repair at our institution. Early referral to a specialized unit for BDI repair may improve long-term outcome.

摘要

本研究旨在报告胆囊切除术后胆管损伤(BDI)修复后晚期失败再手术的结果。回顾性分析 2007 年 8 月至 2020 年 7 月在我院行再手术治疗胆囊切除术后 BDI 修复后晚期失败的所有患者。在接受 BDI 修复的 262 例患者中,有 66 例因晚期失败而行再手术。末次尝试修复与复发性症状出现之间的中位时间为 18 个月。85%的修复失败患者在尝试修复后 5 年内出现症状。失败修复最常见的 BDI 类型为 E3。所有患者均行 Roux-en-Y 肝肠吻合术。23 例(35%)患者发生 29 例术后并发症。术后死亡率为 1.5%。术后中位住院时间为 9 天(5-61 天)。在中位随访 80 个月(12-150 个月)期间,5.2%(3/58)的患者发生临床相关吻合口狭窄。3 例继发性胆汁性肝硬化患者在随访期间因肝功能失代偿而死亡。总体而言,83%(48/58)的患者获得了良好或优秀的长期预后,明显低于初次修复患者(82.8%比 92.7%,p=0.039)。对于胆囊切除术后 BDI 修复后失败的患者,再手术是安全的,大多数患者可获得良好的长期临床效果。但在失败修复组,长期结果不如我院初次修复组满意。早期转至专门的 BDI 修复单位可能会改善长期预后。

相似文献

1
Outcome of reoperative surgery for late failure of postcholecystectomy bile duct injury repair.胆囊切除术后胆管损伤修复后晚期失败的再次手术治疗结果。
Updates Surg. 2022 Oct;74(5):1543-1550. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01325-2. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
2
Reoperative surgery after repair of postcholecystectomy bile duct injuries: is it worthwhile?胆囊切除术后胆管损伤修复后的再次手术:是否值得?
World J Surg. 2013 Mar;37(3):573-81. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1847-y.
3
Surgical management of bile duct injuries sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: perioperative results in 200 patients.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆管损伤的外科治疗:200例患者的围手术期结果
Ann Surg. 2005 May;241(5):786-92; discussion 793-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000161029.27410.71.
4
Impact of referral pattern and timing of repair on surgical outcome after reconstruction of post-cholecystectomy bile duct injury: A multicenter study.经胆囊切除术后胆管损伤重建术后的转介模式和修复时机对手术结果的影响:一项多中心研究。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2021 Feb;20(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
5
Outcomes of surgery for post-cholecystectomy bile duct injuries: An audit from a tertiary referral center.胆囊切除术后胆管损伤的手术治疗结果:来自一家三级转诊中心的审计。
J Visc Surg. 2020 Feb;157(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
6
Laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy after bile duct injury.胆管损伤后的腹腔镜肝空肠吻合术。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):876-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4282-y. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
7
Reoperative surgery for postcholecystectomy bile duct injuries.胆囊切除术后胆管损伤的再次手术
Dig Surg. 2002;19(1):22-7. doi: 10.1159/000052001.
8
Long-term follow-up of 120 patients after hepaticojejunostomy for treatment of post-cholecystectomy bile duct injuries: A retrospective cohort study.120 例胆肠吻合术后胆管损伤患者的长期随访:回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jun;18:205-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 May 9.
9
Management and mid- to long-term results of early referred bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中早期转诊胆管损伤的管理及中长期结果
Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Jan-Feb;56(89):17-25.
10
Management of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: long-term outcome and risk factors infuencing biliary reconstruction.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆管损伤的处理:长期结局及影响胆管重建的危险因素
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2014 Jul-Aug;109(4):493-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term results of oversized balloon dilation for benign anastomotic biliary strictures: initial two-center experience.超大球囊扩张治疗良性吻合口胆管狭窄的长期结果:最初的两中心经验。
Radiol Bras. 2022 Mar-Apr;55(2):90-96. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2021.0027.
2
Benign anastomotic biliary strictures untreatable by ERCP: a novel percutaneous balloon dilatation technique avoiding indwelling catheters.良性吻合口胆管狭窄经 ERCP 治疗无效:一种新的经皮球囊扩张技术,避免留置导管。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Feb;29(2):636-644. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5526-8. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
3
Long-term follow-up and risk factors for strictures after hepaticojejunostomy for bile duct injury: An analysis of surgical and percutaneous treatment in a tertiary center.
肝肠吻合术后胆管损伤后狭窄的长期随访及危险因素:三级中心手术和经皮治疗分析。
Surgery. 2018 May;163(5):1121-1127. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
4
Percutaneous-endoscopic rendezvous procedure for the management of bile duct injuries after cholecystectomy: short- and long-term outcomes.经皮内镜会师术治疗胆囊切除术后胆管损伤:短期和长期结果。
Endoscopy. 2018 Jun;50(6):577-587. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-123935. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
5
Diminished Survival in Patients with Bile Leak and Ductal Injury: Management Strategy and Outcomes.胆汁漏和胆管损伤患者的生存能力下降:管理策略和结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr;226(4):568-576.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.023. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
6
Long-term Impact of Bile Duct Injury on Morbidity, Mortality, Quality of Life, and Work Related Limitations.胆管损伤对发病率、死亡率、生活质量和工作相关限制的长期影响。
Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):143-150. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002258.
7
Benign Biliary Strictures: Diagnostic Evaluation and Approaches to Percutaneous Treatment.良性胆管狭窄:诊断评估与经皮治疗方法
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Dec;18(4):210-7. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
8
Percutaneous balloon dilatation and long-term drainage as treatment of anastomotic and nonanastomotic benign biliary strictures.经皮气囊扩张及长期引流治疗吻合口及非吻合口良性胆管狭窄
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Dec;37(6):1559-67. doi: 10.1007/s00270-014-0836-y. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
9
Improved outcomes of bile duct injuries in the 21st century.21 世纪胆管损伤的治疗转归得到改善。
Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):490-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a1b25b.
10
Reoperative surgery after repair of postcholecystectomy bile duct injuries: is it worthwhile?胆囊切除术后胆管损伤修复后的再次手术:是否值得?
World J Surg. 2013 Mar;37(3):573-81. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1847-y.