• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在爱尔兰成立一个委员会,对疑似克雅氏病病例进行生前审查。

Establishing a committee for antemortem reviews of suspect Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease cases in Ireland.

机构信息

Department of Neuropathology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.

Department of Neuroradiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Jun;192(3):1349-1354. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-03070-2. Epub 2022 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-022-03070-2
PMID:35840825
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9286704/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is a rapidly progressive, neurodegenerative disease. In Ireland, clinical diagnostics and laboratory testing remain the responsibility of the managing clinician and the Neuropathology Department at the Beaumont Hospital, respectively. Centralized review of individual cases is not undertaken.

AIMS

To determine how diagnostic processes for CJD could be improved in Ireland and to outline the structure and referral process for a new CJD review panel at the Beaumont Hospital.

METHODS

We surveyed Irish neurologists' experiences on the management of CJD in Ireland. We measured turnaround times (TAT) for CSF samples referred for diagnostic CJD testing. Finally, we retrospectively reviewed imaging of autopsy-proven CJD cases to compare with initial reports.

RESULTS

Ninety-three percent of neurologists supported a national central review of suspect CJD cases. A second clinical opinion was considered to be of likely benefit by 79%. Additionally, 93% reported that a centralized review of neuroradiology would be useful. All respondents felt that expediting turnaround of CSF analysis would be of benefit. The average TAT for CSF testing was 35.4 days. In retrospective review of imaging, all patients demonstrated MRI findings consistent with CJD. However, in only one of these cases were the initial pre-autopsy radiological findings reported as being consistent with CJD.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the need for improvements to the Irish National CJD Surveillance Unit to maximize antemortem diagnostic accuracy. On foot of this, a clinical CJD Multidisciplinary Team (CJD MDT) has been established to provide a second opinion on (i) the patient's clinical history, (ii) neuroradiology and (iii) and neurophysiology reports (where available).

摘要

背景

克雅氏病(CJD)是一种快速进展的神经退行性疾病。在爱尔兰,临床诊断和实验室检测分别由主治临床医生和 Beaumont 医院神经病理学部门负责。未对个别病例进行集中审查。

目的

确定如何改进爱尔兰的 CJD 诊断流程,并概述 Beaumont 医院新的 CJD 审查小组的结构和转介流程。

方法

我们调查了爱尔兰神经病学家在爱尔兰管理 CJD 的经验。我们测量了 CSF 样本转介进行诊断性 CJD 检测的周转时间(TAT)。最后,我们回顾性地审查了尸检证实的 CJD 病例的影像学,以与初始报告进行比较。

结果

93%的神经病学家支持对疑似 CJD 病例进行国家集中审查。79%的人认为第二次临床意见可能有益。此外,93%的人报告说,对神经放射学进行集中审查将是有用的。所有受访者都认为加快 CSF 分析的周转时间将是有益的。CSF 检测的平均 TAT 为 35.4 天。在对影像学的回顾性审查中,所有患者的 MRI 表现均与 CJD 一致。然而,在这些病例中,只有一例报告的初始术前放射学结果与 CJD 一致。

结论

这些发现支持对爱尔兰国家 CJD 监测单位进行改进,以最大限度地提高生前诊断准确性。在此基础上,成立了临床 CJD 多学科小组(CJD MDT),为(i)患者的临床病史、(ii)神经放射学和(iii)神经生理学报告(如有)提供第二次意见。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed3a/10250498/5d64868c4391/11845_2022_3070_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed3a/10250498/1899a1cce262/11845_2022_3070_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed3a/10250498/cd6d7bfc2026/11845_2022_3070_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed3a/10250498/7a3f7c6f0384/11845_2022_3070_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed3a/10250498/5d64868c4391/11845_2022_3070_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed3a/10250498/1899a1cce262/11845_2022_3070_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed3a/10250498/cd6d7bfc2026/11845_2022_3070_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed3a/10250498/7a3f7c6f0384/11845_2022_3070_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed3a/10250498/5d64868c4391/11845_2022_3070_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Establishing a committee for antemortem reviews of suspect Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease cases in Ireland.在爱尔兰成立一个委员会,对疑似克雅氏病病例进行生前审查。
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Jun;192(3):1349-1354. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-03070-2. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
2
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease surveillance in Argentina, 1997-2008.1997-2008 年阿根廷克雅氏病监测。
Neuroepidemiology. 2011;37(3-4):193-202. doi: 10.1159/000331907. Epub 2011 Nov 5.
3
CJD surveillance in the Republic of Ireland from 2005 to 2015: a suggested algorithm for referrals.2005年至2015年爱尔兰共和国的克雅氏病监测:转诊建议算法
Clin Neuropathol. 2017 Jul/Aug;36(4):188-194. doi: 10.5414/NP301016.
4
Brain biopsies requiring Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease precautions in the Republic of Ireland 2005-2016.2005年至2016年爱尔兰共和国需要采取克雅氏病预防措施的脑活检情况。
Ir J Med Sci. 2018 May;187(2):515-520. doi: 10.1007/s11845-017-1673-1. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
5
Overview and evaluation of 15 years of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease surveillance in Belgium, 1998-2012.1998 - 2012年比利时克雅氏病15年监测概述与评估
BMC Neurol. 2015 Dec 2;15:250. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0507-x.
6
Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease in Slovak Patients: over 10-Year Period Review.脑脊液生物标志物在斯洛伐克患者克雅氏病诊断中的应用:10 年回顾性研究。
Mol Neurobiol. 2017 Oct;54(8):5919-5927. doi: 10.1007/s12035-016-0128-4. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
7
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in Ireland: epidemiological aspects 1980-2002.爱尔兰的克雅氏病:1980 - 2002年的流行病学情况
Eur Neurol. 2004;51(3):132-7. doi: 10.1159/000077063. Epub 2004 Feb 26.
8
[Psychiatric manifestations of a new variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Apropos of a case].[新型克雅氏病的精神症状。附病例报告]
Encephale. 2001 Mar-Apr;27(2):194-7.
9
Brain biopsy in patients with suspected Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.疑似克雅氏病患者的脑活检
J Neurosurg. 2008 Oct;109(4):735-41. doi: 10.3171/JNS/2008/109/10/0735.
10
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: updated diagnostic criteria, treatment algorithm, and the utility of brain biopsy.克雅氏病:更新后的诊断标准、治疗方案及脑活检的作用
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Nov;39(5):E2. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.FOCUS15328.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging in patients with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.磁共振弥散加权成像对散发性克雅氏病的诊断价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Dec;31(12):9073-9085. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08031-4. Epub 2021 May 12.
2
Prion disease incidence in the United States: 2003-2015.美国朊病毒病发病率:2003-2015 年。
Neurology. 2020 Jan 14;94(2):e153-e157. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008680. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
3
RT-QuIC: a new test for sporadic CJD.
实时震颤诱导转化(RT-QuIC):一种用于散发性克雅氏病的新检测方法。
Pract Neurol. 2019 Feb;19(1):49-55. doi: 10.1136/practneurol-2018-001935. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
4
Validation and utilization of amended diagnostic criteria in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease surveillance.修改后的克雅氏病监测诊断标准的验证和应用。
Neurology. 2018 Jul 24;91(4):e331-e338. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005860. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
5
Brain biopsies requiring Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease precautions in the Republic of Ireland 2005-2016.2005年至2016年爱尔兰共和国需要采取克雅氏病预防措施的脑活检情况。
Ir J Med Sci. 2018 May;187(2):515-520. doi: 10.1007/s11845-017-1673-1. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
6
CJD mimics and chameleons.克雅氏病的模仿者和变色龙
Pract Neurol. 2017 Apr;17(2):113-121. doi: 10.1136/practneurol-2016-001571. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
7
Sensitive and specific detection of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease brain prion protein using real-time quaking-induced conversion.使用实时液流诱导转换技术灵敏且特异地检测散发性克雅氏病脑部朊病毒蛋白。
J Gen Virol. 2012 Feb;93(Pt 2):438-449. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.033365-0. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
8
Human transmissible spongiform encephalopathies in eleven countries: diagnostic pattern across time, 1993-2002.11个国家的人类可传播性海绵状脑病:1993 - 2002年随时间变化的诊断模式
BMC Public Health. 2006 Nov 10;6:278. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-278.
9
Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: risk of transmission by blood transfusion and blood therapies.变异型克雅氏病:输血及血液治疗的传播风险
Haemophilia. 2006 Mar;12 Suppl 1:8-15; discussion 26-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01195.x.
10
EEG in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.克雅氏病中的脑电图
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 May;117(5):935-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.007. Epub 2006 Jan 25.