treadmill 与平地跑——两种运动测量系统的比较。
Treadmill vs. overground trotting - a comparison of two kinetic measurement systems.
机构信息
Department of Evolution and Zoology, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Germany Erbertstraße 1, 07741 Jena, Germany.
Department of Evolution and Zoology, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Germany Erbertstraße 1, 07741 Jena, Germany.
出版信息
Res Vet Sci. 2022 Dec 5;150:149-155. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2022.06.019. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
Force plates are considered the gold standard for kinetic gait analysis, benefiting from measuring three-dimensional ground reaction forces. Nevertheless, the major disadvantage is that many trials are required during overground locomotion to capture adequate single-limb contacts. Additionally, the dogs slightly change velocities during overground walking, influencing kinetic and kinematic gait parameters. An alternative is using an instrumented treadmill that benefits from capturing many steady-state gait cycles at a constant speed quickly. The goal of this study was (1) to compare overground with treadmill locomotion and (2) to compare the instrumented treadmill with force plates for dogs kinetics measurements. Twelve client-owned dogs were measured during treadmill trotting while the treadmill was placed on force plates. Additionally, the dogs were measured during trotting along an alley over eight force plates. Bland-Altman plots, Pearson's (r), and concordance correlation coefficients (r) were computed to explore the relative and general agreement between the measurement methods and overground and treadmill trotting. Overground and treadmill trotting gave an excellent agreement in peak vertical forces and impulses (r > 0.9, r > 0.9). The instrumented treadmill showed similar force-time curves in shape and size and provided an excellent congruity for all parameters compared to force plates (r > 0.8, r > 0.8). As a reliable tool in measuring key gait parameters, the instrumented treadmill may benefit from fast and reproducible data comparable to overground trotting.
力板被认为是运动分析的黄金标准,它受益于测量三维地面反作用力。然而,主要的缺点是在地面运动中需要进行多次试验才能捕捉到足够的单腿接触。此外,狗在地面行走时的速度会略有变化,从而影响动力学和运动学步态参数。一种替代方法是使用带仪器的跑步机,它可以快速捕获许多在恒定速度下的稳定步态周期。本研究的目的是:(1)比较地面运动和跑步机运动;(2)比较仪器化跑步机和力板测量狗的动力学参数。12 只宠物狗在跑步机上跑步时进行测量,同时跑步机放在力板上。此外,狗在沿着 8 个力板的跑道上跑步时进行测量。Bland-Altman 图、Pearson(r)和一致性相关系数(r)用于探索测量方法与地面和跑步机跑步之间的相对和一般一致性。地面和跑步机跑步在峰值垂直力和冲量上具有极好的一致性(r>0.9,r>0.9)。与力板相比,仪器化跑步机的力-时曲线形状和大小相似,并为所有参数提供了极好的一致性(r>0.8,r>0.8)。作为测量关键步态参数的可靠工具,仪器化跑步机可能受益于与地面跑步相当的快速和可重复的数据。