The University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 16;22(1):1363. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13738-0.
The number of food banks (charitable outlets of emergency food parcels) and the volume of food distributed by them increased multi-fold in the United Kingdom (UK) since 2010. The overwhelming majority of users of food banks are severely food insecure. Since food insecurity implies a nutritionally inadequate diet, and poor dietary intake has been linked to a number of diseases and chronic conditions, the rise in the number of people using food banks is a phenomenon of significant importance for public health. However, there is a shortage of robust, causal statistical analyses of drivers of food bank use, hindering social and political action on alleviating severe food insecurity.
A panel dataset of 325 local authorities in England was constructed, spanning 9 years (2011/12-2019/20). The dataset included information about the volume of parcels and the number of food banks in the Trussell Trust network, as well as economy-related, welfare system-related and housing-related variables. A quasi-experimental approach was employed in the form of a 'first differencing' ecological model, predicting the number of food parcels distributed by food banks in the Trussell Trust network. This neutralised bias from omitting time-constant unobserved confounders.
Seven predictors in the model were statistically significant, including four related to the welfare system: the value of the main out-of-work benefit; the roll-out of Universal Credit; benefit sanctions; and the 'bedroom tax' in social housing. Of the remaining three significant predictors, one regarded the 'supply' side (the number of food banks in the area) and two regarded the 'demand' side (the proportion of working age population on out-of-work benefits; the proportion of working age population who were unemployed).
The structure of the welfare system has been partly responsible for driving food bank use in the UK since 2011. Severe food insecurity could be alleviated by reforming aspects of the benefit system that have been evidenced to be implicated in the rise in food bank use. More broadly, the findings provide support for 'Health and Health Equity in All Policies' approach to policymaking.
自 2010 年以来,英国(UK)的食品银行(紧急食品包裹的慈善机构)数量和分发的食品量增加了数倍。食品银行的绝大多数使用者都严重缺乏食物保障。由于食物不安全意味着饮食营养不足,而不良的饮食摄入与许多疾病和慢性疾病有关,因此使用食品银行的人数增加是一个对公共健康具有重要意义的现象。然而,对于导致食品银行使用的驱动因素,缺乏强有力的、因果关系的统计分析,这阻碍了缓解严重粮食不安全问题的社会和政治行动。
构建了一个涵盖英格兰 325 个地方当局的面板数据集,时间跨度为 9 年(2011/12-2019/20)。该数据集包括特鲁塞尔信托网络中包裹数量和食品银行数量的信息,以及与经济、福利制度和住房相关的变量。采用“一阶差分”生态模型的准实验方法,预测特鲁塞尔信托网络中食品银行分发的食品包裹数量。这种方法消除了忽略时间不变的未观测混杂因素造成的偏差。
模型中有七个预测因素具有统计学意义,其中四个与福利制度有关:主要失业救济金的价值;普及信贷的推出;福利制裁;以及社会住房中的“卧室税”。在其余三个显著预测因素中,一个与“供应”方面(该地区的食品银行数量)有关,两个与“需求”方面(领取失业救济金的劳动年龄人口比例;劳动年龄人口中失业人口的比例)有关。
自 2011 年以来,英国福利制度的结构在一定程度上导致了食品银行的使用。通过改革福利制度中被认为与食品银行使用增加有关的方面,可以缓解严重的粮食不安全问题。更广泛地说,这些发现为“所有政策中的健康和健康公平”方法提供了支持。