Pharmacy Department, Guangzhou United Family Hospital, Guangzhou, 510335, Guangdong, China.
Guangdong Province Pharmacological Society, No. 753 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2022 Jul 16;23(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s40360-022-00585-3.
The safety assessment of ulinastatin can guide clinical practice. The present study aimed to investigate the real-world safety of ulinastatin in China.
This multicenter study retrospectively analyzed the post-marketing surveillance data of consecutive patients treated with ulinastatin between August 2014 and June 2017 in the general wards and the intensive care units (ICU) of nine hospitals in China. Adverse drug reactions/adverse drug events (ADRs/ADEs) were collected and evaluated in a post-marketing database.
A total of 11,252 consecutive patients were included in the study: 7009 ICU patients and 4243 general ward patients. Eleven patients with ADRs/ADEs were observed, including nine ICU patients and two general ward patients. The clinical manifestations were liver dysfunction (n = 5 ICU cases, n = 1 general case), thrombocytopenia (n = 2 ICU cases, n = 1 general case), leukopenia (n = 1 ICU case), and rash (n = 1 ICU case). During the study period, the drug ADR/ADE rate of ulinastatin injection was 0.98‰ (11/11,252 × 1000‰). Among the 11,252 valid patients, only 327 received ulinastatin in accordance with the drug specifications. After excluding unreasonable drug use, the calculated ADR rate was 3.06‰ (1/327 × 1000‰) (95% confidence interval: 0.0‰-17.1‰). In ICU and general ward patients, the use of other drugs combined with ulinastatin was associated with the occurrence of ADRs/ADEs (100% with ADRs/ADEs vs. 0% in controls, P < 0.001).
The incidence of ADRs/ADEs of ulinastatin is < 5‰. The ADRs/ADEs involved limited organs, mainly the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and blood. In most cases, the ADRs/ADEs gradually alleviated or recovered after drug withdrawal. The inappropriate/off-label use of ulinastatin should be the focus of surveillance.
乌司他丁的安全性评估可以指导临床实践。本研究旨在调查乌司他丁在中国的真实世界安全性。
本多中心研究回顾性分析了 2014 年 8 月至 2017 年 6 月期间在中国 9 家医院的普通病房和重症监护病房(ICU)连续接受乌司他丁治疗的患者的上市后监测数据。在上市后数据库中收集和评估药物不良反应/药物不良事件(ADR/ADE)。
共纳入 11252 例连续患者:7009 例 ICU 患者和 4243 例普通病房患者。观察到 11 例 ADR/ADE 患者,包括 9 例 ICU 患者和 2 例普通病房患者。临床表现为肝功能障碍(5 例 ICU 病例,1 例普通病例)、血小板减少症(2 例 ICU 病例,1 例普通病例)、白细胞减少症(1 例 ICU 病例)和皮疹(1 例 ICU 病例)。在研究期间,乌司他丁注射液的药物 ADR/ADE 率为 0.98‰(11/11252×1000‰)。在 11252 例有效患者中,仅有 327 例按照药物说明书使用乌司他丁。排除不合理用药后,计算得出的 ADR 率为 3.06‰(1/327×1000‰)(95%置信区间:0.0‰-17.1‰)。在 ICU 和普通病房患者中,联合使用其他药物与 ADR/ADE 的发生有关(100%发生 ADR/ADE 与对照组 0%,P<0.001)。
乌司他丁的 ADR/ADE 发生率<5‰。涉及的 ADR/ADE 器官有限,主要为皮肤、胃肠道和血液。大多数情况下,停药后 ADR/ADE 逐渐缓解或恢复。乌司他丁的不适当/标签外使用应成为监测重点。