Department of General Surgery, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Consultant Statistician, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in Low-and-Middle Income Countries, Mumbai, India.
J Surg Res. 2022 Nov;279:480-490. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.05.005. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
Outcomes in patients with isolated traumatic brain injury (iTBI) have not been evaluated comprehensively in low-income and middle-income countries. We aimed to study the in-hospital iTBI mortality and its associated risk factors in a prospective multicenter Indian trauma registry.
Patients with iTBI (head and neck Abbreviated Injury Score ≥2 and other region Abbreviated Injury Score ≤2) were included. Study variables comprised age, gender, mechanism of injury, systolic blood pressure (SBP) at arrival, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score - classified as mild (13-15), moderate (9-12), and severe (3-8), transfer status, and time to presentation at any participating hospital. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the impact of these factors on 24-h and 30-d mortality following iTBI.
Among 5042 included patients, 24-h and 30-d in-hospital mortalities were 5.9% and 22.4%. On a regression analysis, 30-d mortality was associated with age ≥45 y (odds ratio [OR] = 2.1 [1.6-2.7]), railway injury mechanisms (OR = 2.1 [1.3-3.5]), SBP <90 mmHg (OR = 2.6 [1.6-4.1]), and moderate (OR = 3.8 [3.0-5.0]) to severe (OR = 21.1 [16.8-26.7]) iTBI based on GCS scores. 24-h mortality showed similar trends. Patients transferred to the participating hospitals from other centers had higher odds of 30-d mortality (OR = 1.4 [1.2-1.8]) compared to those arriving directly. Those who received neurosurgical intervention had lower odds of 24-h mortality (0.3 [0.2-0.4]).
Age ≥45 y, GCS score ≤12, and SBP <90 mmHg at arrival increased the risk of in-hospital mortality from iTBI.
在低收入和中等收入国家,尚未全面评估单纯性创伤性脑损伤(iTBI)患者的预后。本研究旨在通过一项前瞻性多中心印度创伤登记研究,分析 iTBI 患者的院内死亡率及其相关危险因素。
纳入 iTBI 患者(头颈部损伤严重程度评分[Abbreviated Injury Scale,AIS]≥2 分,其他部位 AIS≤2 分)。研究变量包括年龄、性别、损伤机制、入院时收缩压(systolic blood pressure,SBP)、格拉斯哥昏迷评分(Glasgow Coma Scale,GCS)-分为轻度(13-15 分)、中度(9-12 分)和重度(3-8 分)、转运状态以及在任何参与医院就诊的时间。采用多变量逻辑回归分析评估这些因素对 iTBI 后 24 小时和 30 天死亡率的影响。
共纳入 5042 例患者,24 小时和 30 天院内死亡率分别为 5.9%和 22.4%。回归分析显示,30 天死亡率与年龄≥45 岁(比值比[odds ratio,OR] = 2.1 [1.6-2.7])、铁路损伤机制(OR = 2.1 [1.3-3.5])、SBP<90mmHg(OR = 2.6 [1.6-4.1])、根据 GCS 评分,中度(OR = 3.8 [3.0-5.0])至重度(OR = 21.1 [16.8-26.7])iTBI 相关。24 小时死亡率也显示出类似的趋势。与直接就诊的患者相比,从其他中心转至参与医院的患者 30 天死亡率更高(OR = 1.4 [1.2-1.8])。接受神经外科干预的患者 24 小时死亡率较低(0.3 [0.2-0.4])。
年龄≥45 岁、GCS 评分≤12 分和入院时 SBP<90mmHg 增加了 iTBI 患者的院内死亡率风险。