Master student in Prosthodontics, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, Ingá University Center (Uningá), Maringá, PR, Brazil.
Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, São Leopoldo Mandic Institute and Dental Research Center, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Jul;132(1):100-107. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.04.032. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
Achieving accurate tooth color is important in esthetic dental treatments; however, clinical studies evaluating how ceramic veneer procedures affect color alterations are lacking.
The purpose of this clinical study was to assess the color alteration during treatment with ceramic veneers and to correlate these changes with the tooth treated and veneer thickness.
Ten patients who underwent esthetic treatment were enrolled as participants. Color analysis with the VITA spectrophotometer was performed at baseline, after tooth preparation, immediately after cementation (Final 1), and after 6 to 12 months of follow-up (Final 2). Data of L∗, a∗, b∗, shade guide unit (SGU), ΔE, ΔE, and variation in SGU (ΔSGU) were obtained. Thickness of the veneer was also recorded. Each participant was considered as a statistical block, and the mean results for each tooth (maxillary central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines) were presented. Data were evaluated by the mixed model for repeated measures and Tukey-Kramer post hoc test (L∗, a∗, b∗), generalized linear models (thickness, ΔE, ΔE, SGU), Friedman test (ΔSGU), and the Pearson test was used to correlate veneer thickness and color change (ΔE, ΔE, ΔSGU) (α=.05).
Among the teeth treated, no differences were found in ceramic thicknesses. The mean thickness was 1.03 mm for central incisors, 0.96 for lateral incisors, and 0.89 for canines. The b∗ values increased significantly after preparation and decreased after cementation (P<.001). For ΔE, ΔE, and ΔSGU, there was no statistically significant difference between the types of tooth at each respective time of analysis (P>.05). Regardless of the tooth, a decrease in the SGU score was detected after cementation (P=.015). After tooth preparation, there was significant correlation (P<.05) between ceramic thickness and ΔSGU (r=0.36).
Treatment with ceramic veneers resulted in color change, mainly with respect to the b∗ axis (yellow), producing objective differences in the ΔE analysis. Although ceramic thickness correlated with the VITA scale change (ΔSGU) after tooth wear or preparation, ceramic thickness did not differ among tooth types and did not correlate with changes in color parameters after cementation. (P>.05).
在美学牙科治疗中,实现准确的牙齿颜色很重要;然而,评估陶瓷贴面程序如何影响颜色变化的临床研究还很缺乏。
本临床研究的目的是评估治疗过程中陶瓷贴面的颜色变化,并将这些变化与治疗的牙齿和贴面厚度相关联。
10 名接受美学治疗的患者被纳入研究对象。使用 VITA 分光光度计在基线、牙体预备后、即刻粘结后(最终 1)和 6 至 12 个月随访后(最终 2)进行颜色分析。获取 L∗、a∗、b∗、比色板单位(SGU)、ΔE、ΔE 和 SGU 变化(ΔSGU)的数据。还记录了贴面的厚度。每位患者被视为一个统计块,每个牙齿(上颌中切牙、侧切牙和尖牙)的平均结果均被呈现。使用重复测量混合模型和 Tukey-Kramer 事后检验(L∗、a∗、b∗)、广义线性模型(厚度、ΔE、ΔE、SGU)、Friedman 检验(ΔSGU)和 Pearson 检验来评估数据,以关联贴面厚度和颜色变化(ΔE、ΔE、ΔSGU)(α=.05)。
在所治疗的牙齿中,陶瓷厚度没有差异。中切牙的平均厚度为 1.03mm,侧切牙为 0.96mm,尖牙为 0.89mm。预备后 b∗值显著增加,粘结后降低(P<.001)。对于 ΔE、ΔE 和 ΔSGU,在每次分析的不同牙齿类型之间没有统计学上的显著差异(P>.05)。无论牙齿类型如何,粘结后 SGU 评分均降低(P=.015)。牙体预备后,陶瓷厚度与 ΔSGU 之间存在显著相关性(P<.05)(r=0.36)。
陶瓷贴面治疗会导致颜色变化,主要是 b∗轴(黄色),在 ΔE 分析中产生客观差异。尽管陶瓷厚度与牙体预备或磨损后 VITA 比色板变化(ΔSGU)相关(P<.05),但陶瓷厚度在不同牙齿类型之间没有差异,并且与粘结后颜色参数的变化无关(P>.05)。