J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 Nov-Dec;62(6):1912-1918. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
Clinical pharmacists are often used to make recommendations regarding tacrolimus therapy in the post transplant setting.Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of tacrolimus after transplant is based on trough levels in the setting of predetermined institutional immunosuppression goals. To evaluate time within therapeutic range (TTR) of tacrolimus the Rosendaal method can be utilized.
Our study aimed to compare objective therapeutic drug monitoring outcomes after the implementation of a pharmacist driven tacrolimus management protocol (postprotocol initiation) with previous management by providers (preprotocol initiation).
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC) is a 700-bed academic medical center in Columbus, OH. On average, OSUWMC completes more than 300 kidney transplants each year. There are 6 abdominal transplant pharmacists (including one postgraduate year 2 transplant pharmacy resident) that rotate through the inpatient and outpatient setting.
A pharmacist-led tacrolimus management protocol in kidney transplant recipients was initiated in October 2018 at our institution, which enabled pharmacists to dose and adjust tacrolimus in the outpatient setting in accordance with prespecified goals.
This single-center retrospective analysis included adult kidney transplant recipients on de novo tacrolimus. Patient's tacrolimus levels were evaluated for 6 months after transplant. The mean tacrolimus percent TTR and the median coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated and compared in postprotocol initiation group (n = 85) with preprotocol initiation group (n = 39). TTR was calculated using the Rosendaal method.
There was no statistically significant difference between the preprotocol initiation and postprotocol initiation group mean TTR (59.6% vs. 60.5%, P = 0.723), mean CV from 0-3 months after transplant (36.3 vs. 36.0, P = 0.900), and mean CV from at least 3-6 months after transplant (24.5 vs. 22.7, P = 0.351). Rejection rates, development of donor-specific antibodies, and renal function were similar between groups.
Based on our findings, transplant pharmacists were equally as effective at maintaining tacrolimus percent TTR and CV in the designated kidney transplant recipients included in the management protocol compared with primary management by other transplant providers. The delegation of tacrolimus management to clinical pharmacists is a viable alternative to primary management by outpatient practitioners.
临床药师常用于在移植后环境中提出他克莫司治疗建议。移植后他克莫司的治疗药物监测(TDM)基于预定机构免疫抑制目标下的谷底水平。为了评估他克莫司的治疗范围内时间(TTR),可以使用 Rosendaal 方法。
我们的研究旨在比较实施药师驱动的他克莫司管理方案(方案后)与提供者先前管理(方案前)后的客观治疗药物监测结果。
俄亥俄州立大学韦克斯纳医学中心(OSUWMC)是位于俄亥俄州哥伦布市的一家 700 床学术医疗中心。平均而言,OSUWMC 每年完成超过 300 例肾脏移植。有 6 名腹部移植药剂师(包括一名第二年住院药师)在住院和门诊环境中轮转。
我们机构于 2018 年 10 月启动了一项药师主导的肾脏移植受者他克莫司管理方案,使药剂师能够根据预设目标在门诊环境中给药和调整他克莫司。
这项单中心回顾性分析包括开始使用他克莫司的新诊断的成年肾脏移植受者。在移植后 6 个月评估患者的他克莫司水平。方案后组(n=85)和方案前组(n=39)分别计算并比较平均他克莫司 TTR 百分比和中位变异系数(CV)。TTR 使用 Rosendaal 方法计算。
方案前组和方案后组的平均 TTR(59.6%比 60.5%,P=0.723)、移植后 0-3 个月的平均 CV(36.3 比 36.0,P=0.900)和至少 3-6 个月的平均 CV(24.5 比 22.7,P=0.351)均无统计学显著差异。两组之间的排斥率、供体特异性抗体的发展和肾功能相似。
根据我们的发现,与其他移植提供者的主要管理相比,参与管理方案的指定肾脏移植受者中,移植药剂师在维持他克莫司 TTR 和 CV 方面同样有效。将他克莫司管理委托给临床药剂师是一种可行的替代方案,可替代门诊医生的主要管理。