Di Fermo Fernando, Sforza Noelia, Rosmarin Melanie, Morosan Allo Yanina, Parisi Carina, Santamaria Jimena, Pacenza Nestor, Zuk Carlos, Faingold Cristina, Ferraro Florencia, Meroño Tomas, Brenta Gabriela
Endocrinology Department, Cesar Milstein Hospital, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Radiology Department, Cesar Milstein Hospital, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Endocrine. 2020 Aug;69(2):331-338. doi: 10.1007/s12020-020-02295-4. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
To comparatively assess the performance of three sonographic classification systems, American Thyroid Association (ATA), the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS), and American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE)/American College of Endocrinology (ACE)/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi (AME) in identifying malignant nodules in an elderly population.
Cross-sectional study of patients referred for fine needle aspiration biopsy in an academic center for the elderly. One nodule/patient was considered. Nodules classified Bethesda V/VI were considered malignant. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were established and compared to evaluate diagnostic performance. Malignancy among biopsies below the size cutoff for each ultrasound classification was also compared.
One thousand, eight hundred sixty-seven patients (92% females); median (Q1-Q3), age 71 (67-76) years, were studied showing 82.8% benign (Bethesda II) and 2.6% malignant cytology. The three classifications correctly identified malignancy (P < 0.01). Nonetheless, in the ATA and AACE/ACE/AME 16 and 2 malignant nodules, respectively, were unclassifiable. Including unclassified malignant nodules (n = 1234, malignant = 50), comparison of the ROC curves showed lower performance of ATA [area under the curve (AUC) = ATA (0.49) vs. ACR TI-RADS (0.62), p = 0.008 and ATA vs. AACE/ACE/AME (0.59), p = 0.022]. Proportion of below size cutoff biopsies for ATA, ACR TI-RADS, and AACE/ACE/AME was different [16, 42, and 29% (all p < 0.001)], but no differences in malignancy rate were observed in these nodules.
The present study is the first to validate in elderly patients these classifications showing that AACE/ACE/AME and ACR TI-RADS can predict thyroid malignancy more accurately than the ATA when unclassifiable malignant nodules are considered. Moreover, in this aged segment of the population, the use of ACR TI-RADS avoided more invasive procedures.
比较评估美国甲状腺协会(ATA)、美国放射学会甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(ACR TI-RADS)以及美国临床内分泌学家协会(AACE)/美国内分泌学会(ACE)/意大利内分泌医师协会(AME)这三种超声分类系统在识别老年人群恶性结节方面的性能。
对一家老年学术中心接受细针穿刺活检的患者进行横断面研究。每位患者考虑一个结节。分类为贝塞斯达V/VI级的结节被视为恶性。建立并比较受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线以评估诊断性能。还比较了每种超声分类大小截断值以下活检中的恶性率。
研究了1867例患者(92%为女性);年龄中位数(Q1-Q3)为71(67-76)岁,显示82.8%为良性(贝塞斯达II级),2.6%为恶性细胞学结果。这三种分类方法均能正确识别恶性肿瘤(P < 0.01)。然而,在ATA和AACE/ACE/AME分类中,分别有16个和2个恶性结节无法分类。纳入未分类的恶性结节(n = 1234,恶性 = 50)后,ROC曲线比较显示ATA的性能较低[曲线下面积(AUC)= ATA(0.49) vs. ACR TI-RADS(0.62),p = 0.008;ATA vs. AACE/ACE/AME(0.59),p = 0.022]。ATA、ACR TI-RADS和AACE/ACE/AME大小截断值以下活检的比例不同[分别为16%、42%和29%(所有p < 0.001)],但在这些结节中未观察到恶性率的差异。
本研究首次在老年患者中验证了这些分类方法,表明在考虑未分类的恶性结节时,AACE/ACE/AME和ACR TI-RADS比ATA能更准确地预测甲状腺恶性肿瘤。此外,在该老年人群中,使用ACR TI-RADS避免了更多的侵入性操作。