• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因门诊护理敏感状况而由救护车转运的患者的特征与结局:日本大阪的一项基于人群的描述性研究。

The Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Transported by Ambulance Due to Ambulatory Care Sensitive Condition: A Population-Based Descriptive Study in Osaka, Japan.

作者信息

Katayama Yusuke, Kanehara Atsushi, Yamashita Yuya, Kitamura Tetsuhisa, Oda Jun

机构信息

Department of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.

Division of Environmental Medicine and Population Sciences, Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 30;10:911675. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.911675. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.911675
PMID:35844890
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9279932/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) are defined as clinical conditions for which the risk of emergency hospital admission can be reduced by timely and effective ambulatory care. However, the actual status of patients with ACSCs who are transported by ambulance and their outcomes have not been fully elucidated. The purpose of this study was to reveal characteristics and outcomes of patients with ACSCs who were transported by ambulance using population-based registry data in Osaka, Japan.

METHODS

This descriptive epidemiological study was conducted in the 5-year period from January 2016 to December 2020, and included patients who were transported by ambulance due to sudden illness. In this study, ACSC was further classified into acute ACSCs, chronic ACSCs, and preventable ACSCs based on the ICD-10. The number of patients transported by ambulance for ACSCs per 100,000 population in each age group was calculated for each year. In addition, Poisson regression models were used to assess the trend in the number of ACSCs patients transported by ambulance.

RESULTS

A total of 1,572,152 patients were included in this study (acute ACSCs, = 69,621; chronic ACSCs, = 12,250; preventable ACSCs, = 96,036; and non-ACSCs, = 1,394,245). The overall median age was 71 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 46-92). Patients with acute ACSCs (median age: 76 years [IQR: 60-84]) and chronic ACSCs (median age: 80 years [IQR: 72-87]) were older, while patients with preventable ACSCs were younger (median age: 66 years [95%CI: 3-81]) and included a high proportion of children (33.3%, 32,002/96,036). Regarding the outcome after treatment at the emergency department, 42.6% (670,392/1,572.152) of patients were hospitalized, while 82.3% (10,079/12,250) of patients with chronic ACSCs were hospitalized. No change was observed in adults ( = 0.001) or elderly (age ≥65 years) individuals ( = 0.376) with preventable ACSCs, however, among children, the number increased until 2019 (732.5) and then decreased in 2020 (371.8) ( = 0.392).

CONCLUSION

In this study, patients with chronic ACSCs were predominantly elderly, while patients with preventable ACSCs were polarized between children and the elderly. Among patients with preventable ACSCs, there was no change over time in adults and children, but there was a marked decrease among the elderly after 2020.

摘要

背景

门诊护理敏感疾病(ACSCs)被定义为通过及时有效的门诊护理可降低急诊住院风险的临床疾病。然而,通过救护车转运的ACSCs患者的实际状况及其结局尚未完全阐明。本研究的目的是利用日本大阪基于人群的登记数据,揭示通过救护车转运的ACSCs患者的特征和结局。

方法

本描述性流行病学研究在2016年1月至2020年12月的5年期间进行,纳入因突发疾病通过救护车转运的患者。在本研究中,根据国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10),ACSC进一步分为急性ACSCs、慢性ACSCs和可预防的ACSCs。计算每年各年龄组每10万人口中因ACSCs通过救护车转运的患者数量。此外,使用泊松回归模型评估通过救护车转运的ACSCs患者数量的趋势。

结果

本研究共纳入1,572,152例患者(急性ACSCs,n = 69,621;慢性ACSCs,n = 12,250;可预防的ACSCs,n = 96,036;非ACSCs,n = 1,394,245)。总体中位年龄为71岁(95%置信区间[CI],46 - 92)。急性ACSCs患者(中位年龄:76岁[四分位间距:60 - 84])和慢性ACSCs患者(中位年龄:80岁[四分位间距:72 - 87])年龄较大,而可预防的ACSCs患者年龄较小(中位年龄:66岁[95%CI:3 - 81]),且儿童比例较高(33.3%,32,002/96,036)。关于在急诊科治疗后的结局,42.6%(670,392/1,572,152)的患者住院,而慢性ACSCs患者中有82.3%(10,079/12,250)住院。可预防的ACSCs在成人(P = 0.001)或老年人(年龄≥65岁)(P = 0.376)中未观察到变化,然而,在儿童中,数量在2019年之前增加(732.5),然后在2020年下降(371.8)(P = 0.392)。

结论

在本研究中,慢性ACSCs患者以老年人为主,而可预防的ACSCs患者在儿童和老年人之间呈两极分化。在可预防的ACSCs患者中,成人和儿童随时间无变化,但在老年人中2020年后有显著下降。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c9/9279932/c472a2c12a54/fpubh-10-911675-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c9/9279932/c472a2c12a54/fpubh-10-911675-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c9/9279932/c472a2c12a54/fpubh-10-911675-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Transported by Ambulance Due to Ambulatory Care Sensitive Condition: A Population-Based Descriptive Study in Osaka, Japan.因门诊护理敏感状况而由救护车转运的患者的特征与结局:日本大阪的一项基于人群的描述性研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 30;10:911675. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.911675. eCollection 2022.
2
Emergency Department Visits and Disease Burden Attributable to Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions in Elderly Adults.老年人因门诊护理敏感条件导致的急诊科就诊和疾病负担。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 7;9(1):3811. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40206-4.
3
Outcome of emergency patients transported by ambulance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Osaka Prefecture, Japan: a population-based descriptive study.日本大阪府新冠疫情期间救护车转运急诊患者的结局:一项基于人群的描述性研究
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 11;11:1322236. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1322236. eCollection 2023.
4
Factors associated with prolonged hospitalization among patients transported by emergency medical services: A population-based study in Osaka, Japan.与急救医疗服务转运患者住院时间延长相关的因素:日本大阪的一项基于人群的研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 3;100(48):e27862. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027862.
5
Unseen patterns of preventable emergency care: Emergency department visits for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.可预防的急诊医疗未被发现的模式:因门诊可治疗的疾病而急诊。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2022 Jul;27(3):232-241. doi: 10.1177/13558196211059128. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
6
Association of Primary Language and Hospitalization for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions.主要语言与门诊护理敏感条件住院的关联。
Med Care. 2020 Jan;58(1):45-51. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001245.
7
Hospitalizations for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions in a Large City of Japan: a Descriptive Analysis Using Claims Data.日本一大型城市的门诊护理敏感条件住院情况:基于索赔数据的描述性分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(15):3917-3924. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07713-z. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
8
In-Hospital Deaths From Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan.日本 COVID-19 大流行前后门诊护理敏感条件的住院死亡情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2319583. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.19583.
9
Factors in Avoidable Emergency Visits for Ambulatory Care-sensitive Conditions among Older Patients Receiving Home Care in Japan: A Retrospective Study.日本居家护理老年患者可避免急诊就诊的因素:一项回顾性研究。
Intern Med. 2022;61(2):177-183. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.7136-21. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
10
Effect of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes on preventable hospital admissions: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.2016年熊本地震对可预防的住院情况的影响:日本的一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 12;8(7):e021294. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021294.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of indicators for avoidable emergency medical service calls by mapping paramedic clinical impression codes to ambulatory care sensitive conditions and mental health conditions in the UK and Canada.开发指标以避免不必要的紧急医疗服务呼叫,方法是将护理人员临床印象代码映射到英国和加拿大的门诊医疗敏感条件和心理健康条件。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 12;13(12):e073520. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073520.

本文引用的文献

1
Avoidable Hospitalizations in Persons with Dementia: a Population-Wide Descriptive Study (2000-2015).痴呆症患者中可避免的住院情况:一项全人群描述性研究(2000 - 2015年)
Can Geriatr J. 2021 Sep 1;24(3):209-221. doi: 10.5770/cgj.24.486. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Regional variation of potentially avoidable hospitalisations in Switzerland: an observational study.瑞士可避免住院治疗的区域性差异:一项观察性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 21;21(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06876-5.
3
Spatial Analysis of Factors Associated with Hospitalizations for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions among Old Adults in Minas Gerais State.
米纳斯吉拉斯州老年人因门诊护理敏感状况住院相关因素的空间分析。
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2021 Jun 14;24:e210037. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720210037. eCollection 2021.
4
Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions Among All-Payer Claimants With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.所有付费人群中伴有智力和发育障碍的门诊护理敏感条件。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2021 May 1;126(3):203-215. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-126.3.203.
5
Trends in rates and inequalities in paediatric admissions for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions in Victoria, Australia (2003 to 2013).澳大利亚维多利亚州儿科门诊可治疗条件住院率及不平等趋势(2003 年至 2013 年)。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2021 Jun;57(6):860-866. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15338. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
6
Trends in pediatric hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive respiratory diseases in Brazil.巴西儿科因门诊可治疗的呼吸系统疾病住院治疗的趋势。
Public Health Nurs. 2021 Jan;38(1):106-114. doi: 10.1111/phn.12818. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
7
Cumulative social disadvantage and hospitalisations due to ambulatory care-sensitive conditions in Finland in 2011─2013: a register study.2011 - 2013年芬兰因门诊护理敏感疾病导致的累积社会劣势与住院情况:一项登记研究
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 26;10(8):e038338. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038338.
8
Mortality related to ambulatory care sensitive hospitalisations in Finland.芬兰与门诊医疗敏感住院相关的死亡率。
Scand J Public Health. 2020 Dec;48(8):839-846. doi: 10.1177/1403494820944722. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
9
Frequent emergency department use by older adults with ambulatory care sensitive conditions: A population-based cohort study.老年人使用流动医疗敏感条件频繁急诊:基于人群的队列研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020 Apr;20(4):317-323. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13875. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
10
A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern.一场引发全球卫生关注的新型冠状病毒疫情。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):470-473. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30185-9. Epub 2020 Jan 24.