Merzenich M M, Nelson R J, Kaas J H, Stryker M P, Jenkins W M, Zook J M, Cynader M S, Schoppmann A
J Comp Neurol. 1987 Apr 8;258(2):281-96. doi: 10.1002/cne.902580208.
Detailed microelectrode maps of the hand representation were derived in cortical areas 3b and 1 from a series of normal adult owl and squirrel monkeys. While overlap relationships were maintained, and all maps were internally topographic, many map features varied significantly when examined in detail. Variable features of the hand representations among different monkeys included a) the overall shapes and sizes of hand surface representations; b) the actual and proportional areas of representations of different skin surfaces and the cortical magnifications of representations of specific skin surfaces, which commonly varied severalfold in area 3b and manyfold in area 1; c) the topographic relationships among skin surface representations, with skin surfaces that were represented adjacently in some monkeys represented in locations many hundreds of microns apart in others; d) the internal orderliness of representations; e) the completeness of representations of the dorsal hand surfaces; and f) the skin surfaces represented along the borders of the hand representation. Owl monkey maps were, in general, internally more strictly topographic than squirrel monkey maps. In both species, area 3b was more strictly topographic and less variable than was area 1. The degree of individual variability revealed in these experiments is difficult to reconcile with the hypothesis that details of cortical maps are ontogenetically specified during a period in early life. Instead, we propose that differences in the details of cortical map structure are the consequence of individual differences in lifelong use of the hands. This conclusion is consistent with earlier studies of the consequences of peripheral nerve transection and digital amputation, which revealed that cortical maps are dynamically maintained and are alterable as a function of use or nerve injury in these monkeys (Merzenich et al., '83a,b, '84a; Merzenich, '86; Jenkins et al., '84; Jenkins and Merzenich, '87).
通过对一系列正常成年猫头鹰猴和松鼠猴进行研究,得出了在皮质区3b和1中手部代表区的详细微电极图谱。虽然重叠关系得以维持,且所有图谱在内部都是拓扑性的,但在详细检查时,许多图谱特征存在显著差异。不同猴子之间手部代表区的可变特征包括:a) 手部表面代表区的整体形状和大小;b) 不同皮肤表面代表区的实际面积和比例面积,以及特定皮肤表面代表区的皮质放大倍数,在3b区其面积通常变化几倍,在1区则变化许多倍;c) 皮肤表面代表区之间的拓扑关系,在一些猴子中相邻代表的皮肤表面,在其他猴子中则相隔数百微米;d) 代表区的内部有序性;e) 手背表面代表区的完整性;f) 沿手部代表区边界代表的皮肤表面。一般来说,猫头鹰猴的图谱在内部比松鼠猴的图谱更严格地具有拓扑性。在这两个物种中,3b区比1区更严格地具有拓扑性且变化更小。这些实验中揭示的个体变异性程度,很难与皮质图谱细节在生命早期阶段由个体发育决定的假设相协调。相反,我们提出皮质图谱结构细节的差异是手部终身使用个体差异的结果。这一结论与早期关于周围神经横断和手指截肢后果的研究一致,这些研究表明皮质图谱是动态维持的,并且会随着这些猴子的使用或神经损伤而改变(Merzenich等人,1983a、b,1984a;Merzenich,1986;Jenkins等人,1984;Jenkins和Merzenich,1987)。