Suppr超能文献

剖宫产史患者不同子宫内膜准备的妊娠结局。

Pregnancy Outcomes of Different Endometrial Preparation in Patients With a History of Cesarean Section.

机构信息

Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Reproductive Medicine Center, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-XIANGYA, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 30;13:813791. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.813791. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacies of three cycle regimens in women receiving frozen embryo transfer with a history of cesarean section: natural cycle treatment, hormone replacement therapy and treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

patients (N = 6,159) with a history of caesarean section who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study from January 2014 to December 2019 at the CITIC-Xiangya Hospital of Reproduction and Genetics. Reproductive outcomes of patients in the natural cycle (n = 4,306) versus hormone replacement therapy (n = 1,007) versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist + hormone replacement therapy groups (n = 846) were compared. Continuous data were analyzed using Student's t-test, and categorical variables were analyzed using the χ2 test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the possible relationships between the types of endometrial preparation and pregnancy outcomes after adjusting for confounding factors.

RESULTS

The unadjusted odds of the miscarriage rate of singleton pregnancies were significantly higher in the hormone replacement therapy compared with the natural cycle (25.5% versus 20.4%, respectively). After adjusting for possible confounding factors, the early miscarriage rate and the miscarriage rate of singleton pregnancies remained significantly higher in the hormone replacement therapy than the natural cycle. The clinical pregnancy rates in the natural cycle, hormone replacement therapy and gonadotropin- releasing hormone agonist + hormone replacement therapy of women with a history of cesarean section was 48.8%, 48% and 47.1%, respectively, and the live birth rates were 37%, 34.1% and 35.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In women undergoing frozen embryo transfer with a history of cesarean section, hormone replacement therapy for endometrial preparation was associated with a higher early miscarriage rate, albeit after statistical adjustment for confounding factors. However, the risk observed was little and did not influence the overall reproductive performances.

摘要

目的

探讨剖宫产史患者行冻融胚胎移植时采用自然周期、激素替代疗法和促性腺激素释放激素激动剂治疗的疗效。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

方法

2014 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月,中信湘雅生殖与遗传专科医院纳入符合纳入标准的剖宫产史患者 6159 例,比较自然周期(n=4306)、激素替代疗法(n=1007)和促性腺激素释放激素激动剂+激素替代疗法(n=846)组患者的生殖结局。采用 Student's t 检验比较连续变量,采用 χ2 检验比较分类变量。采用多变量逻辑回归校正混杂因素后评估不同内膜准备类型与妊娠结局的可能关系。

结果

未校正时,激素替代疗法组单胎妊娠流产率显著高于自然周期组(25.5%比 20.4%)。校正混杂因素后,激素替代疗法组早期流产率和单胎妊娠流产率仍显著高于自然周期组。剖宫产史患者自然周期、激素替代疗法和促性腺激素释放激素激动剂+激素替代疗法的临床妊娠率分别为 48.8%、48%和 47.1%,活产率分别为 37%、34.1%和 35.7%。

结论

在剖宫产史行冻融胚胎移植的患者中,尽管校正混杂因素后,激素替代疗法用于内膜准备与早期流产率升高相关,但风险很小,不影响整体生殖结局。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验