Suppr超能文献

听力受损者以及噪声掩蔽下的正常听力者对无意义音节的识别。

Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers.

作者信息

Humes L E, Dirks D D, Bell T S, Kincaid G E

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Mar;81(3):765-73. doi: 10.1121/1.394845.

Abstract

In the present study, speech-recognition performance was measured in four hearing-impaired subjects and twelve normal hearers. The normal hearers were divided into four groups of three subjects each. Speech-recognition testing for the normal hearers was accomplished in a background of spectrally shaped noise in which the noise was shaped to produce masked thresholds identical to the quiet thresholds of one of the hearing-impaired subjects. The question addressed in this study is whether normal hearers with a hearing loss simulated through a shaped masking noise demonstrate speech-recognition difficulties similar to those of listeners with actual hearing impairment. Regarding overall percent-correct scores, the results indicated that two of the four hearing-impaired subjects performed better than their corresponding subgroup of noise-masked normal hearers, whereas the other two impaired listeners performed like the noise-masked normal listeners. A gross analysis of the types of errors made suggested that subjects with actual and simulated losses frequently made different types of errors.

摘要

在本研究中,对4名听力受损受试者和12名听力正常者进行了言语识别性能测试。听力正常者被分为4组,每组3人。对听力正常者的言语识别测试是在频谱成形噪声背景下完成的,其中噪声被成形为产生与一名听力受损受试者的安静阈值相同的掩蔽阈值。本研究探讨的问题是,通过成形掩蔽噪声模拟听力损失的听力正常者是否表现出与实际听力受损者类似的言语识别困难。关于总体正确百分比得分,结果表明,4名听力受损受试者中有2名的表现优于相应的噪声掩蔽听力正常者亚组,而另外2名受损听众的表现与噪声掩蔽听力正常者相似。对所犯错误类型的粗略分析表明,实际听力损失和模拟听力损失的受试者经常犯不同类型的错误。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验