• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

听力受损者的辅音识别损失。

Consonant recognition loss in hearing impaired listeners.

机构信息

Army Audiology and Speech Center, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307, USA.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Nov;126(5):2683-94. doi: 10.1121/1.3238257.

DOI:10.1121/1.3238257
PMID:19894845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2787079/
Abstract

This paper presents a compact graphical method for comparing the performance of individual hearing impaired (HI) listeners with that of an average normal hearing (NH) listener on a consonant-by-consonant basis. This representation, named the consonant loss profile (CLP), characterizes the effect of a listener's hearing loss on each consonant over a range of performance. The CLP shows that the consonant loss, which is the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) difference at equal NH and HI scores, is consonant-dependent and varies with the score. This variation in the consonant loss reveals that hearing loss renders some consonants unintelligible, while it reduces noise-robustness of some other consonants. The conventional SNR-loss metric DeltaSNR(50), defined as the SNR difference at 50% recognition score, is insufficient to capture this variation. The DeltaSNR(50) value is on average 12 dB lower when measured with sentences using standard clinical procedures than when measured with nonsense syllables. A listener with symmetric hearing loss may not have identical CLPs for both ears. Some consonant confusions by HI listeners are influenced by the high-frequency hearing loss even at a presentation level as high as 85 dB sound pressure level.

摘要

本文提出了一种简洁的图形化方法,用于比较个别听力障碍(HI)听众与平均正常听力(NH)听众在逐个辅音的基础上的性能。这种表示法称为辅音损失谱(CLP),它描述了听力损失对每个辅音在一定性能范围内的影响。CLP 表明,辅音损失是 NH 和 HI 得分相等时的信噪比(SNR)差异,是辅音依赖性的,并且随得分而变化。这种辅音损失的变化表明,听力损失使某些辅音难以理解,同时降低了某些其他辅音对噪声的鲁棒性。传统的 SNR 损失度量 DeltaSNR(50)定义为 50%识别得分时的 SNR 差异,不足以捕捉这种变化。使用标准临床程序的句子进行测量时,DeltaSNR(50)值比使用无意义音节进行测量时平均低 12dB。双侧听力损失对称的听众可能不会对两只耳朵都有相同的 CLP。一些 HI 听众的辅音混淆甚至在高达 85dB 声压级的呈现水平下也受到高频听力损失的影响。

相似文献

1
Consonant recognition loss in hearing impaired listeners.听力受损者的辅音识别损失。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Nov;126(5):2683-94. doi: 10.1121/1.3238257.
2
Aided and unaided speech perception by older hearing impaired listeners.老年听力受损听众的助听和非助听言语感知
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 2;10(3):e0114922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114922. eCollection 2015.
3
The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.选择性辅音增强对听力障碍者在噪声中句子识别的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov;130(5):3028-37. doi: 10.1121/1.3641407.
4
Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.理解听力受损听众中过度的信噪比损失。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Apr;24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.4.3.
5
Within-consonant perceptual differences in the hearing impaired ear.听力障碍者耳内辅音感知差异。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jul;134(1):607-17. doi: 10.1121/1.4807474.
6
Effects of Expanding Envelope Fluctuations on Consonant Perception in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.扩展包络波动对听力受损者辅音感知的影响。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518775293. doi: 10.1177/2331216518775293.
7
Measuring consonant identification in nonsense syllables, words, and sentences.测量在无意义音节、单词和句子中的辅音识别能力。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(3):243-60. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.04.0040.
8
Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.使用希尔伯特变换时间精细结构语音和恢复包络语音对听力正常和受损的听众进行噪声中的辅音识别。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jul;138(1):389-403. doi: 10.1121/1.4922949.
9
Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.模拟听力损失对双语儿童噪声中辅音识别的影响。
Ear Hear. 2017 Sep/Oct;38(5):e292-e304. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000428.
10
Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.可听度和多通道宽动态范围压缩对重度听力损失患者辅音识别的影响。
Ear Hear. 2009 Oct;30(5):494-504. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181aec5bc.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-Modal Sensory Boosting to Improve High-Frequency Hearing Loss: Device Development and Validation.跨模态感官增强改善高频听力损失:设备开发与验证
JMIRx Med. 2024 Feb 9;5:e49969. doi: 10.2196/49969.
2
Effect of Realistic Test Conditions on Perception of Speech, Music, and Binaural Cues in Normal-Hearing Listeners.真实测试条件对正常听力者感知言语、音乐和双耳线索的影响。
Am J Audiol. 2023 Mar;32(1):170-181. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-22-00143. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
3
Adaptive Syllable Training Improves Phoneme Identification in Older Listeners with and without Hearing Loss.适应性音节训练可改善有听力损失和无听力损失的老年听众的音素识别能力。
Audiol Res. 2022 Nov 18;12(6):653-673. doi: 10.3390/audiolres12060063.
4
Can Closed-Set Word Recognition Differentially Assess Vowel and Consonant Perception for School-Age Children With and Without Hearing Loss?闭合集词识别能否区分有听力损失和无听力损失学龄儿童的元音和辅音感知?
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Oct 17;65(10):3934-3950. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-20-00749. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
5
Phonological and semantic similarity of misperceived words in babble: Effects of sentence context, age, and hearing loss.语音和语义相似性对背景噪声中听错词的影响:句子语境、年龄和听力损失的作用。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Jan;151(1):650. doi: 10.1121/10.0009367.
6
Development and Pilot Testing of Smartphone-Based Hearing Test Application.基于智能手机的听力测试应用程序的开发和初步测试。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 21;18(11):5529. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115529.
7
Acoustic-Phonetic Mismatches Impair Serial Recall of Degraded Words.声学-语音不匹配会损害对退化单词的系列回忆。
Audit Percept Cogn. 2020;3(1-2):55-75. doi: 10.1080/25742442.2020.1846012. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
8
High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss Alters Cue-Weighting Strategies for Discriminating Stop Consonants in Noise.高频传感器神经性听力损失改变了在噪声中辨别塞音的线索加权策略。
Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216519886707. doi: 10.1177/2331216519886707.
9
Evaluating hearing aid amplification using idiosyncratic consonant errors.使用特殊辅音错误评估助听器放大效果。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Dec;142(6):3736. doi: 10.1121/1.5016852.
10
Substitution Patterns of Phoneme Errors in Hearing Aid and Cochlear Implant Users.助听器和人工耳蜗使用者音素错误的替代模式
J Audiol Otol. 2017 Apr;21(1):28-32. doi: 10.7874/jao.2017.21.1.28. Epub 2017 Mar 30.

本文引用的文献

1
The development of recorded auditory tests for measuring hearing loss for speech.用于测量言语听力损失的记录式听觉测试的发展。
Laryngoscope. 1947 Jan;57(1):57-89.
2
Consonant confusions in white noise.白噪声中的辅音混淆。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Aug;124(2):1220-33. doi: 10.1121/1.2913251.
3
A method to identify noise-robust perceptual features: application for consonant /t/.一种识别抗噪声感知特征的方法:应用于辅音/t/
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 May;123(5):2801-14. doi: 10.1121/1.2897915.
4
Effects of long-term training on aided speech-recognition performance in noise in older adults.长期训练对老年人噪声环境下助听后言语识别能力的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Jun;51(3):759-71. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/054).
5
The contributions of audibility and cognitive factors to the benefit provided by amplified speech to older adults.可听度和认知因素对放大语音给老年人带来益处的贡献。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2007 Jul-Aug;18(7):590-603. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.18.7.6.
6
An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.对正常听力听众和听力损失听众使用BKB-SIN、HINT、QuickSIN和WIN材料的评估。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Aug;50(4):844-56. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/059).
7
Consonant and vowel confusions in speech-weighted noise.言语加权噪声中的辅音和元音混淆。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Apr;121(4):2312-26. doi: 10.1121/1.2642397.
8
A model of the VU (volume-unit) meter, with speech applications.一种带有语音应用的VU(音量单位)表模型。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Jan;121(1):279-85. doi: 10.1121/1.2387130.
9
Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.一种用于测量正常听力和听力受损听众信噪比损失的快速噪声环境下言语测试方法的开发。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Oct;116(4 Pt 1):2395-405. doi: 10.1121/1.1784440.
10
Evaluating a speech-reception threshold model for hearing-impaired listeners.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 May;93(5):2879-85. doi: 10.1121/1.405807.