• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为0.25至16千赫兹音调的声级函数的声级辨别。

Level discrimination as a function of level for tones from 0.25 to 16 kHz.

作者信息

Florentine M, Buus S, Mason C R

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 May;81(5):1528-41. doi: 10.1121/1.394505.

DOI:10.1121/1.394505
PMID:3584690
Abstract

Difference limens for level (delta L in dB = 20 log [(p + delta p)/p], where p is pressure) were measured as a function of level for tones at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 kHz. At each frequency, test levels encompassed the range from near threshold to 95 dB SPL in steps of 10 dB or smaller. The stimulus duration was 500 ms and the interstimulus interval was 250 ms. An adaptive two-alternative forced-choice procedure with feedback was used. Results for six normal listeners show individual differences among listeners, but the general trends seen in the average data clearly are present in the individual data and show the following. First, the delta Ls at all but the highest frequencies are generally smaller at high levels than at low levels. Second, the delta Ls at equal SPLs are largely independent of frequency up to about 4 kHz, but increase with frequency above 4 kHz. Third, at 8 and 10 kHz, the delta Ls are clearly nonmonotonic functions of level, showing consistent deterioration in the mid-level delta Ls relative to the low- and high-level delta Ls. The present data are discussed qualitatively in terms of current models of level discrimination.

摘要

测量了0.25、0.5、1、2、4、8、10、12、14和16千赫兹音调的强度辨别阈(以分贝为单位的ΔL = 20 log[(p + Δp)/p],其中p为压力)作为强度的函数。在每个频率下,测试强度范围从接近阈值到95分贝声压级,步长为10分贝或更小。刺激持续时间为500毫秒,刺激间隔为250毫秒。采用了带有反馈的自适应二选一强制选择程序。六位正常听力者的结果显示了个体之间的差异,但平均数据中呈现的总体趋势在个体数据中也明显存在,具体如下。首先,除了最高频率外,所有频率下的ΔL在高强度时通常比低强度时小。其次,在声压级相等的情况下,ΔL在大约4千赫兹以下很大程度上与频率无关,但在4千赫兹以上随频率增加。第三,在8和10千赫兹时,ΔL明显是强度的非单调函数,相对于低强度和高强度的ΔL,中强度的ΔL持续恶化。根据当前的强度辨别模型对本数据进行了定性讨论。

相似文献

1
Level discrimination as a function of level for tones from 0.25 to 16 kHz.作为0.25至16千赫兹音调的声级函数的声级辨别。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 May;81(5):1528-41. doi: 10.1121/1.394505.
2
Level discrimination of tones as a function of duration.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1986 Mar;79(3):792-8. doi: 10.1121/1.393469.
3
Psychometric functions for level discrimination.用于水平辨别的心理测量函数。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Sep;90(3):1371-80. doi: 10.1121/1.401928.
4
Level discrimination of frozen and random noise.冻结噪声和随机噪声的电平鉴别
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Jun;87(6):2643-54. doi: 10.1121/1.399057.
5
Intensity discrimination, increment detection, and magnitude estimation for 1-kHz tones.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Jul;84(1):172-8. doi: 10.1121/1.396961.
6
Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin.主要为耳蜗性起源听力损失的听众中响度的时间整合
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Jun;105(6):3464-80. doi: 10.1121/1.424673.
7
Intensity discrimination as a function of level and frequency and its relation to high-frequency hearing.强度辨别作为声级和频率的函数及其与高频听力的关系。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1983 Nov;74(5):1375-9. doi: 10.1121/1.390162.
8
Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.正常听力成年人高频畸变产物耳声发射的重复性
Ear Hear. 2006 Oct;27(5):466-79. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000233892.37803.1a.
9
Loudness adaptation at high frequencies.高频响度适应
J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Sep;94(3 Pt 1):1281-6. doi: 10.1121/1.408154.
10
Psychometric functions for discrimination of two-component complex tones in listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss.正常听力听众和听力损失听众对双成分复合音辨别能力的心理测量函数。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Apr;105(4):2454-65. doi: 10.1121/1.426850.

引用本文的文献

1
Compression may be a general tendency of auditory distance judgments: evidence from distance estimates using a novel echolocation skill.压缩可能是听觉距离判断的一种普遍趋势:来自使用新型回声定位技能进行距离估计的证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Oct 21;243(11):231. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07180-y.
2
Profile analysis in listeners with normal and elevated audiometric thresholds: Behavioral and modeling results.听力阈值正常和升高的听众的轮廓分析:行为学和建模结果。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2024 Dec 1;156(6):4303-4325. doi: 10.1121/10.0034635.
3
Limitations in human auditory spectral analysis at high frequencies.
人耳在高频时的频谱分析的局限性。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2024 Jul 1;156(1):326-340. doi: 10.1121/10.0026475.
4
Adaptation in auditory processing.听觉处理的适应。
Physiol Rev. 2023 Apr 1;103(2):1025-1058. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00011.2022. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
5
Electro-Haptic Stimulation: A New Approach for Improving Cochlear-Implant Listening.电触觉刺激:一种改善人工耳蜗听力的新方法。
Front Neurosci. 2021 Jun 9;15:581414. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.581414. eCollection 2021.
6
Sensitivity to haptic sound-localisation cues.对触觉声音定位线索的敏感性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 11;11(1):312. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79150-z.
7
Comparison of Intensity Discrimination between Children Using Cochlear Implants and Typically Developing Children.使用人工耳蜗的儿童与正常发育儿童之间的强度辨别比较。
J Int Adv Otol. 2019 Dec;15(3):368-372. doi: 10.5152/iao.2019.7464.
8
The Effects of Duration and Level on Spectral Modulation Perception.时长和强度对光谱调制感知的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Oct 25;62(10):3876-3886. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-H-18-0449. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
9
Supra-Threshold Hearing and Fluctuation Profiles: Implications for Sensorineural and Hidden Hearing Loss.阈上听力与波动特征:对感音神经性听力损失和隐匿性听力损失的影响
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2018 Aug;19(4):331-352. doi: 10.1007/s10162-018-0669-5. Epub 2018 May 9.
10
Cochlear neuropathy and the coding of supra-threshold sound.耳蜗神经病变与阈上声音的编码。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Feb 21;8:26. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00026. eCollection 2014.