Department of Psychiatry, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Health Care Center, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2022 Dec;42(4):398-409. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12275. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
This systematic review is aimed to update and reintegrate the pharmacotherapy of social anxiety disorder (SAD), including the Japanese medical database.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacotherapy of SAD according to the Medical Information Distribution Service. We used data from a most recent systematic review, and updated search were conducted using MEDLINE, PubMed, CENTRAL, ICTRP, and ICHUSHI from August 1st, 2017 to January 31st, 2022. The outcome were response rates assessed by Clinical Global Impressions Improvement, efficacy assessed by the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), and dropout rates. We performed a random effect of meta-analysis to obtain the differences in each outcome between active medication and placebo. We used RevMan version 5.3 for analyses.
We identified 5 studies through update search and performed meta-analysis for 33 studies on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and 6 studies on serotonin noradrenalin reuptake inhibitor (SNRI). The response rate (RR = 1.62) and the LSAS score reduction (mean difference = -9.65) of SSRI, and the response rate (RR = 1.57) and the LSAS score reduction (mean difference = -11.72) of SNRI were significantly different from placebo. The dropout rates of SSRI or SNRI were not significant. The response rates of SSRIs in both Japanese studies (RR = 1.44) and countries other than Japan (RR = 1.67) were significant. Most findings were based on low quality of evidence.
SSRIs are valid option for pharmacotherapy of SAD including Japanese patients. SNRIs are another effective option. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to several risk of bias.
本系统评价旨在更新和整合社交焦虑障碍(SAD)的药物治疗,包括日本医学数据库。
我们根据医疗信息分布服务进行了 SAD 药物治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析。我们使用了最近的一项系统评价的数据,并于 2017 年 8 月 1 日至 2022 年 1 月 31 日期间,使用 MEDLINE、PubMed、CENTRAL、ICTRP 和 ICHUSHI 进行了更新检索。结局指标为临床总体印象改善评估的反应率、Liebowitz 社交焦虑量表(LSAS)评估的疗效和脱落率。我们采用随机效应荟萃分析来获得活性药物与安慰剂之间每种结局的差异。分析采用 RevMan 版本 5.3。
我们通过更新检索确定了 5 项研究,并对 33 项选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)和 6 项 5-羟色胺去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRI)的研究进行了荟萃分析。SSRI 的反应率(RR=1.62)和 LSAS 评分降低(平均差=-9.65),以及 SNRI 的反应率(RR=1.57)和 LSAS 评分降低(平均差=-11.72)与安慰剂相比差异有统计学意义。SSRI 或 SNRI 的脱落率无统计学意义。日本研究(RR=1.44)和日本以外国家(RR=1.67)中 SSRI 的反应率均有统计学意义。大多数发现基于低质量证据。
SSRI 是包括日本患者在内的 SAD 药物治疗的有效选择。SNRI 是另一种有效选择。然而,由于存在多种偏倚风险,结果应谨慎解释。