Suppr超能文献

移动评估在心肺康复中心的体验回避、情绪、压力和出勤率。

Mobile assessment of experiential avoidance, mood, stress, and attendance in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation.

机构信息

Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center.

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Health Psychol. 2022 Dec;41(12):955-963. doi: 10.1037/hea0001204. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study utilized mobile ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine the dynamic relationships among experiential avoidance (EA), mood, and cardiopulmonary rehabilitation (CVPR) attendance.

METHOD

Participants ( = 47; 40.4% female; 80.1% White; 85.1% Cardiac, 14.9% Pulmonary) were recruited from CVPR during their first 2 weeks of the program. They completed daily EMA prompts to assess momentary mood and EA for 2 weeks using a smartphone device. Multilevel modeling (MLM) was employed to investigate the impact of EA and mood on next-week attendance and the within-person within-prompt correlates, antecedents, and consequences of EA.

RESULTS

Greater EA and negative mood significantly predicted worse next-week CVPR attendance rates. Within the same EMA prompt individuals with higher EA also reported greater negative affect and perceived stress, while individuals with lower EA reported greater positive mood. In addition, lagged analyses showed that EA was negatively related to next-day positive mood scores.

CONCLUSIONS

EA appears to be an important targetable mechanism negatively related to CVPR program attendance and mood in CVPR patients. The present study builds upon previous research supporting EA as a dynamic and fluid emotion-regulation process, suggesting EA's impact on mood and behavior may be best understood through repeated real-time measurement methodology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

本研究利用移动生态瞬时评估(EMA)来考察经验回避(EA)、情绪和心肺康复(CVPR)参与之间的动态关系。

方法

参与者(n=47;40.4%为女性;80.1%为白人;85.1%为心脏,14.9%为肺部)从 CVPR 招募,招募时间为项目的前 2 周。他们使用智能手机设备完成了为期 2 周的每日 EMA 提示,以评估瞬间情绪和 EA。采用多层建模(MLM)来研究 EA 和情绪对下周出席率的影响,以及 EA 的个体内、同一提示内的相关性、前提和后果。

结果

更高的 EA 和负性情绪显著预测了下周 CVPR 出席率的下降。在同一 EMA 提示中,EA 较高的个体报告的负面情绪和感知压力也更大,而 EA 较低的个体报告的积极情绪更大。此外,滞后分析表明,EA 与次日的积极情绪评分呈负相关。

结论

EA 似乎是一个重要的可靶向机制,与 CVPR 患者的 CVPR 计划参与和情绪呈负相关。本研究建立在以前支持 EA 作为一种动态和流动的情绪调节过程的研究基础上,表明 EA 对情绪和行为的影响可能通过重复的实时测量方法来更好地理解。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验