• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年龄与信息偏好:决策情境中的中立信息源。

Age and information preference: Neutral information sources in decision contexts.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jul 18;17(7):e0268713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268713. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0268713
PMID:35849571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9292105/
Abstract

Do adults of different ages differ in their focus on positive, negative, or neutral information when making decisions? Some research suggests an increasing preference for attending to and remembering positive over negative information with advancing age (i.e., an age-related positivity effect). However, these prior studies have largely neglected the potential role of neutral information. The current set of three studies used a multimethod approach, including self-reports (Study 1), eye tracking and choice among faces reflecting negative, neutral, or positive health-related (Study 2) and leisure-related information (Study 3). Gaze results from Studies 2 and 3 as well as self-reports from Study 1 showed a stronger preference for sources of neutral than for positive or negative information regardless of age. Findings also suggest a general preference for decision-relevant information from neutral compared to positive or negative sources. Focusing exclusively on the difference between positive (happy) and negative (angry) faces, results are in line with the age-related positivity effect (i.e., the difference in gaze duration between happy and angry faces was significantly larger for older than for younger adults). These findings underscore the importance of neutral information across age groups. Thus, most research on the positivity effect may be biased in that it does not consider the strong preference for neutral over positive information.

摘要

不同年龄段的成年人在做决策时,对积极、消极或中性信息的关注是否存在差异?一些研究表明,随着年龄的增长,人们越来越倾向于关注和记住积极信息而不是消极信息(即与年龄相关的正性效应)。然而,这些先前的研究在很大程度上忽略了中性信息的潜在作用。当前这组三项研究采用了多方法的方法,包括自我报告(研究 1)、眼动追踪以及对反映负面、中性或正面与健康相关(研究 2)和休闲相关的信息(研究 3)的面孔的选择。研究 2 和 3 的注视结果以及研究 1 的自我报告均表明,无论年龄大小,人们都更倾向于选择中性信息源,而不是积极或消极信息源。研究结果还表明,与积极(快乐)和消极(愤怒)面孔相比,人们普遍更喜欢中性信息源提供的与决策相关的信息。只关注积极(快乐)和消极(愤怒)面孔之间的差异,研究结果与与年龄相关的正性效应一致(即,对于老年人而言,快乐和愤怒面孔之间的注视持续时间差异显著大于年轻人)。这些发现强调了中性信息在所有年龄段的重要性。因此,大多数关于正性效应的研究可能存在偏差,因为它们没有考虑到对中性信息的强烈偏好超过了对积极信息的偏好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8857/9292105/91d73a855db6/pone.0268713.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8857/9292105/b92e649d2b13/pone.0268713.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8857/9292105/7c1fb7ded24a/pone.0268713.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8857/9292105/5d17c5dde743/pone.0268713.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8857/9292105/38e78f73eca2/pone.0268713.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8857/9292105/d9a58ebe007b/pone.0268713.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8857/9292105/481fc82e6d54/pone.0268713.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8857/9292105/91d73a855db6/pone.0268713.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8857/9292105/b92e649d2b13/pone.0268713.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8857/9292105/7c1fb7ded24a/pone.0268713.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8857/9292105/5d17c5dde743/pone.0268713.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8857/9292105/38e78f73eca2/pone.0268713.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8857/9292105/d9a58ebe007b/pone.0268713.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8857/9292105/481fc82e6d54/pone.0268713.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8857/9292105/91d73a855db6/pone.0268713.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Age and information preference: Neutral information sources in decision contexts.年龄与信息偏好:决策情境中的中立信息源。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 18;17(7):e0268713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268713. eCollection 2022.
2
Gaze direction differentially affects avoidance tendencies to happy and angry faces in socially anxious individuals.注视方向会对社交焦虑个体对快乐和愤怒面孔的回避倾向产生差异影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Apr;48(4):290-4. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.11.008. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
3
Binocular rivalry: a window into emotional processing in aging.双眼竞争:洞察衰老过程中的情绪处理。
Psychol Aging. 2011 Jun;26(2):372-80. doi: 10.1037/a0022029.
4
The impact of aging on the neural networks involved in gaze and emotional processing.衰老对参与注视和情绪处理的神经网络的影响。
Neurobiol Aging. 2016 Dec;48:182-194. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.08.026. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
5
Gaze-fixation to happy faces predicts mood repair after a negative mood induction.注视快乐面孔可预测负面情绪诱导后情绪修复。
Emotion. 2014 Feb;14(1):85-94. doi: 10.1037/a0034500. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
6
Effects of affective and emotional congruency on facial expression processing under different task demands.在不同任务需求下,情感和情绪一致性对面部表情加工的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Jun;187:66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.04.013. Epub 2018 May 8.
7
A quick eye to anger: An investigation of a differential effect of facial features in detecting angry and happy expressions.迅速洞察愤怒:面部特征在检测愤怒和快乐表情中差异效应的研究。
Int J Psychol. 2017 Jun;52(3):171-179. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12202. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
8
Young and older emotional faces: are there age group differences in expression identification and memory?年轻和年长的情绪面孔:表情识别与记忆方面是否存在年龄组差异?
Emotion. 2009 Jun;9(3):329-39. doi: 10.1037/a0015179.
9
Emotion first: children prioritize emotional faces in gaze-cued attentional orienting.情绪优先:儿童在目光引导的注意力定向中优先注意情绪面孔。
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):101-111. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01237-8. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
10
Angry faces are tracked more easily than neutral faces during multiple identity tracking.在多身份追踪过程中,愤怒的面孔比中性面孔更容易被追踪到。
Cogn Emot. 2018 May;32(3):464-479. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1315929. Epub 2017 Apr 12.

本文引用的文献

1
It Is What You Have, Not What You Lose: Effects of Perceived Gains and Losses on Goal Orientation Across Adulthood.拥有而非失去:感知收益和损失对成年期目标取向的影响。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Nov 13;75(10):2106-2111. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz163.
2
Affective Influences on Older Adults' Attention to Self-Relevant Negative Information.老年人对自我相关负性信息注意的情感影响。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Apr 12;74(4):642-651. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx108.
3
What Facial Appearance Reveals Over Time: When Perceived Expressions in Neutral Faces Reveal Stable Emotion Dispositions.
随着时间推移面部外观所揭示的内容:当中性面孔中的感知表情揭示稳定的情绪倾向时。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 30;7:986. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00986. eCollection 2016.
4
The influence on perceptions of truthfulness of the emotional expressions shown when talking about failure.谈论失败时所展现的情绪表达对真实性认知的影响。
Eur J Psychol. 2015 Feb 27;11(1):125-38. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v11i1.877. eCollection 2015 Feb.
5
Does positivity operate when the stakes are high? Health status and decision making among older adults.当风险很高时,积极心态是否起作用?老年人的健康状况与决策制定。
Psychol Aging. 2015 Jun;30(2):348-55. doi: 10.1037/a0039121. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
6
When choice matters: task-dependent memory effects in older adulthood.当选择很重要时:老年期的任务依赖型记忆效应。
Psychol Aging. 2013 Dec;28(4):923-36. doi: 10.1037/a0034520.
7
Mood Regulation in Real-Time: Age Differences in the Role of Looking.实时情绪调节:注视作用中的年龄差异
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012 Aug 1;21(4):237-242. doi: 10.1177/0963721412448651.
8
Age, gender, and arousal in recognition of negative and neutral pictures 1 year later.1 年后对负性和中性图片的识别中的年龄、性别和唤醒。
Psychol Aging. 2012 Dec;27(4):1039-52. doi: 10.1037/a0027946. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
9
The resolution of facial expressions of emotion.面部表情情感的分辨
J Vis. 2011 Nov 30;11(13):24. doi: 10.1167/11.13.24.
10
Enhanced right amygdala activity in adolescents during encoding of positively valenced pictures.青少年在正性情绪图片编码时右杏仁核活动增强。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jan;1(1):88-99. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2010.08.004.