Service de Néphrologie, Transplantation et Réanimation Rénale, CHU Saint-Etienne, Saint Etienne, France.
Laboratoire d'Immunologie et Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France.
Transplantation. 2022 Dec 1;106(12):2456-2461. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004247. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
HLAs contain combinations of multiple eplets, sometimes shared between numerous HLA alleles. Some authors suggested that single antigen bead (SAB) assays may underestimate the signal of anti-HLA antibodies (Ab) when several beads share the targeted eplet. However, this assumption has not yet been validated experimentally.
We selected 5 eplets shared by 1-24 beads of the routine SAB kits: the eplet 163LS/G; the 3 eplets 127K, 62GE, and 62GRN thereafter called cross-reactive group 2C; the 82LR eplet, well-known as Bw4; the locally called QB2A5 eplet associated with the DQA105:01/DQB102:01 combination; and the 40GR DQ eplet. We selected a dozen of sera for each eplet with Ab mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) between 1000 and 15 000 for the beads carrying the targeted eplet. We tested them with the classical SAB panel (SABp), with an isolated bead carrying the eplet (isolated SAB [SABi]) and with a mixture of both (SABp+i).
No significant difference in MFI was detected among SABi, SABp, and SABp+i conditions for all the eplets.
We noticed only a nonsignificant difference in the Ab MFI signal due to eplet sharing on the SAB assay. We, therefore, conclude that this phenomenon should no longer be considered as a significant risk factor during patient follow-up pre- or posttransplantation.
HLA 包含多个表位的组合,有时在许多 HLA 等位基因之间共享。一些作者认为,当多个珠子共享目标表位时,单个抗原珠(SAB)检测可能会低估抗 HLA 抗体(Ab)的信号。然而,这一假设尚未得到实验验证。
我们选择了常规 SAB 试剂盒的 1-24 个珠子共享的 5 个表位:表位 163LS/G;随后称为交叉反应组 2C 的 3 个表位 127K、62GE 和 62GRN;82LR 表位,也称为 Bw4;当地称为 QB2A5 表位,与 DQA105:01/DQB102:01 组合相关联;以及 40GR DQ 表位。我们为每个表位选择了十几个血清,其针对携带目标表位的珠子的 Ab 平均荧光强度(MFI)在 1000 到 15000 之间。我们用经典的 SAB 面板(SABp)、携带表位的单个珠子(分离的 SAB [SABi])和两者的混合物(SABp+i)对其进行了测试。
对于所有表位,在 SABi、SABp 和 SABp+i 条件下,MFI 之间没有检测到显著差异。
我们只注意到由于 SAB 检测中的表位共享导致 Ab MFI 信号的非显著差异。因此,我们得出结论,在移植前后的患者随访中,不应再将这种现象视为一个重要的危险因素。