• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A rapid assessment of take-home naloxone provision during COVID-19 in Europe.在 COVID-19 期间欧洲家庭内纳洛酮供应的快速评估。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Sep;107:103787. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103787. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
2
Twenty years of take-home naloxone for the prevention of overdose deaths from heroin and other opioids-Conception and maturation.用于预防海洛因及其他阿片类药物过量致死的带回家式纳洛酮二十年——构想与成熟历程
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Sep 1;178:176-187. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 25.
3
Does naloxone provision lead to increased substance use? A systematic review to assess if there is evidence of a 'moral hazard' associated with naloxone supply.纳洛酮供应是否会导致药物使用增加?一项系统评价评估与纳洛酮供应相关的“道德风险”是否存在证据。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Feb;100:103513. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103513. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
4
Take-Home Naloxone Kits: Attitudes and Likelihood-Of-Use Outcomes from a European Survey of Potential Overdose Witnesses.带离式纳洛酮试剂盒:一项针对潜在药物过量目击者的欧洲调查的态度和使用意愿结果。
Eur Addict Res. 2022;28(3):220-225. doi: 10.1159/000521197. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
5
A systematic review of the distribution of take-home naloxone in low- and middle-income countries and barriers to the implementation of take-home naloxone programs.在中低收入国家中,将纳洛酮带回家的分布情况的系统评价以及将纳洛酮带回家方案实施的障碍。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Oct 20;19(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00700-x.
6
Overdose and take-home naloxone in emergency settings: A pilot study examining feasibility of delivering brief interventions addressing overdose prevention with 'take-home naloxone' in emergency departments.在紧急情况下的过量用药和携带纳洛酮回家:一项试点研究,考察在急诊科提供针对预防过量用药的“携带纳洛酮回家”的简短干预措施的可行性。
Emerg Med Australas. 2022 Aug;34(4):509-518. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13925. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
7
With crisis comes opportunity: Unanticipated benefits resulting from pivots to take-home naloxone (THN) programs during the COVID-19 pandemic.危机带来机遇:COVID-19 大流行期间,转为推广纳洛酮家庭使用(THN)项目带来了意想不到的好处。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Mar;122:108220. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108220. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
8
Evaluating the impact of a national naloxone programme on ambulance attendance at overdose incidents: a controlled time-series analysis.评估国家纳洛酮计划对过量用药事件救护车出勤情况的影响:一项对照时间序列分析。
Addiction. 2017 Feb;112(2):301-308. doi: 10.1111/add.13602. Epub 2016 Nov 6.
9
Designing, implementing and evaluating the overdose response with take-home naloxone model of care: An evaluation of client outcomes and perspectives.设计、实施和评估带纳洛酮回家护理模式的过量反应:对客户结果和观点的评估。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2020 Jan;39(1):55-65. doi: 10.1111/dar.13015. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
10
Is a randomised controlled trial of take home naloxone distributed in emergency settings likely to be feasible and acceptable? Findings from a UK qualitative study exploring perspectives of people who use opioids and emergency services staff.在急诊环境中分发可携带纳洛酮的随机对照试验是否可行和可接受?一项英国定性研究探索了阿片类药物使用者和急诊服务人员的观点。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 29;24(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00987-y.

引用本文的文献

1
The implementation of take-home naloxone: Lessons learned from a 3-year take-home naloxone project in Germany.纳洛酮带回家计划的实施:德国一项为期三年的纳洛酮带回家项目的经验教训。
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Jul 18;22(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01281-1.
2
Take-home naloxone in multicentre emergency settings: the TIME feasibility cluster RCT.带离型纳洛酮在多中心急救环境中的应用:TIME 可行性集群 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(74):1-69. doi: 10.3310/YNRC8249.
3
Take-home naloxone administered in emergency settings: feasibility of intervention implementation in a cluster randomized trial.在紧急情况下携带纳洛酮:一项集群随机试验中干预措施实施的可行性。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 29;24(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01061-3.
4
Flexible delivery of opioid agonist treatment during COVID-19 in Norway: qualitative and quantitative findings from an online survey of provider experiences.在 COVID-19 期间挪威灵活提供阿片类激动剂治疗:来自提供者经验在线调查的定性和定量发现。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 7;23(1):965. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09959-7.
5
Substance use disorders and COVID-19: reflections on international research and practice changes during the "poly-crisis".物质使用障碍与 COVID-19:“多危机”时期国际研究与实践变革的反思。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 17;11:1201967. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1201967. eCollection 2023.
6
Disruptions to naloxone training among lay and occupational responders in Maryland during the emergence of COVID-19: early impacts, recovery, and lessons learned.COVID-19疫情期间马里兰州非专业和职业急救人员纳洛酮培训的中断:早期影响、恢复情况及经验教训
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2023 Jun 16;8:100173. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2023.100173.
7
Sweden's first Take-Home Naloxone program: participant characteristics, dose endpoints and predictors for overdose reversals.瑞典首个带药回家纳洛酮项目:参与者特征、用药剂量终点及逆转过量用药的预测因素。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023 Apr 22;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13011-023-00533-2.
8
Approaches to enabling rapid evaluation of innovations in health and social care: a scoping review of evidence from high-income countries.促进卫生和社会保健创新快速评估的方法:高收入国家证据的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 20;12(12):e064345. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064345.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining the impact of the first wave of COVID-19 and associated control measures on interventions to prevent blood-borne viruses among people who inject drugs in Scotland: an interrupted time series study.考察 COVID-19 第一波疫情及其相关防控措施对苏格兰注射吸毒人群预防血源性病毒干预措施的影响:一项中断时间序列研究。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Mar 1;232:109263. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109263. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
2
Understanding the Impacts of Novel Coronavirus Outbreaks on People Who Use Drugs: A Systematic Review to Inform Practice and Drug Policy Responses to COVID-19.理解新型冠状病毒爆发对吸毒人群的影响:为应对 COVID-19 提供实践和毒品政策响应的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 11;18(16):8470. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168470.
3
EU drugs agency admits that it misses UK data and expertise.欧盟药品管理局承认其缺少英国的数据和专业知识。
BMJ. 2021 Jun 10;373:n1488. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1488.
4
Health literacy and changes in pattern of drug use among participants at the Stockholm Needle Exchange Program during the COVID-19 pandemic.斯德哥尔摩针头交换项目参与者在新冠疫情期间的健康素养与用药模式变化
Harm Reduct J. 2021 May 10;18(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00499-z.
5
Changes in substance supply and use characteristics among people who use drugs (PWUD) during the COVID-19 global pandemic: A national qualitative assessment in Canada.2019冠状病毒病全球大流行期间吸毒者的物质供应和使用特征变化:加拿大的一项全国性定性评估
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jul;93:103237. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103237. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
6
Preliminary indications of the burden of COVID-19 among people who inject drugs in England and Northern Ireland and the impact on access to health and harm reduction services.英格兰和北爱尔兰注射吸毒人群中 COVID-19 的负担及其对获得卫生和减少伤害服务的影响的初步迹象。
Public Health. 2021 Mar;192:8-11. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.01.004. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
7
The Double Effect of COVID-19 Confinement Measures and Economic Recession on High-Risk Drug Users and Drug Services.COVID-19 禁闭措施和经济衰退对高危吸毒者和毒品服务的双重影响。
Eur Addict Res. 2021;27(4):239-241. doi: 10.1159/000513883. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
8
With crisis comes opportunity: Unanticipated benefits resulting from pivots to take-home naloxone (THN) programs during the COVID-19 pandemic.危机带来机遇:COVID-19 大流行期间,转为推广纳洛酮家庭使用(THN)项目带来了意想不到的好处。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Mar;122:108220. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108220. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
9
Overdose-Related Cardiac Arrests Observed by Emergency Medical Services During the US COVID-19 Epidemic.美国 COVID-19 疫情期间,急救医疗服务中心观察到的与过量用药相关的心脏骤停事件。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 May 1;78(5):562-564. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4218.
10
Addressing co-occurring public health emergencies: The importance of naloxone distribution in the era of COVID-19.应对并发的突发公共卫生事件:纳洛酮分发在新冠疫情时代的重要性。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Sep;83:102872. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102872. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

在 COVID-19 期间欧洲家庭内纳洛酮供应的快速评估。

A rapid assessment of take-home naloxone provision during COVID-19 in Europe.

机构信息

National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.

National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Sep;107:103787. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103787. Epub 2022 Jul 1.

DOI:
10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103787
PMID:35849935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9247228/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. In the following weeks, most European countries implemented national lockdowns to mitigate viral spread. Services for people who use drugs had to quickly revise their operating procedures to rearrange service provision while adhering to lockdown requirements. Given the scarcity of literature published on overdose prevention during COVID-19 in Europe, we aimed to examine how these changes to service provision affected take-home naloxone (THN) programmes and naloxone availability across Europe.

METHODS

Between November 2020 and January 2021, we conducted a rapid assessment with country experts from European countries that provide THN. We sent country experts a template to report monthly THN distribution data (January 1, 2019-October 31, 2020) and a structured 6-item survey for completion.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 14 of the 15 European countries with THN provision of which 11 participated in the rapid assessment: Austria, Denmark, England, Estonia, Lithuania, Northern Ireland, Norway, Scotland, Spain (Catalonia only), Sweden, and Wales. All reported reduced organisational capacity during COVID-19, and some put into place a range of novel approaches to manage the restrictions on face-to-face service provision. In six countries, the introduction of programme innovation occurred alongside the publication of government guidelines recommending increased THN provision during COVID-19. Eight of the eleven participating countries managed to maintain 2019-level monthly THN distribution rates or even increase provision during the pandemic.

CONCLUSION

Through programme innovation supported by public guidelines, many European THN programmes managed to ensure stable or even increased THN provision during the pandemic, despite social distancing and stay-at-home orders affecting client mobility.

摘要

背景

2020 年 3 月,世界卫生组织宣布 COVID-19 为全球大流行。在接下来的几周内,大多数欧洲国家实施了全国封锁,以减轻病毒传播。毒品使用者服务机构必须迅速修改其运营程序,在遵守封锁要求的同时重新安排服务提供。鉴于 COVID-19 期间在欧洲发表的关于过量预防的文献稀缺,我们旨在研究服务提供方式的这些变化如何影响了在欧洲各地的携带纳洛酮(THN)计划和纳洛酮的供应。

方法

在 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 1 月期间,我们与提供 THN 的欧洲国家的国家专家进行了快速评估。我们向国家专家发送了一个模板,用于报告每月的 THN 分配数据(2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 10 月 31 日)和一份结构化的 6 项调查以供完成。

结果

共有 15 个提供 THN 的欧洲国家中的 14 个对快速评估做出了回应,其中 11 个国家参与了快速评估:奥地利、丹麦、英格兰、爱沙尼亚、立陶宛、北爱尔兰、挪威、苏格兰、西班牙(仅加泰罗尼亚)、瑞典和威尔士。所有国家都报告称,在 COVID-19 期间,其组织能力有所下降,并且有些国家采取了一系列新颖的方法来管理对面对面服务提供的限制。在六个国家,在发布政府指南建议在 COVID-19 期间增加 THN 供应的同时,引入了计划创新。11 个参与国中,有 8 个国家设法维持了 2019 年每月 THN 分配率,甚至在大流行期间增加了供应。

结论

通过公共指南支持的计划创新,许多欧洲 THN 计划在大流行期间设法确保了稳定或甚至增加了 THN 的供应,尽管社交距离和居家令影响了客户的流动性。