• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在紧急情况下携带纳洛酮:一项集群随机试验中干预措施实施的可行性。

Take-home naloxone administered in emergency settings: feasibility of intervention implementation in a cluster randomized trial.

机构信息

Swansea University, Swansea, UK.

Yorkshire Ambulance Service, Wakefield, UK.

出版信息

BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 29;24(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01061-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12873-024-01061-3
PMID:39198758
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11360782/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opioids kill more people than any other class of drug. Naloxone is an opioid antagonist which can be distributed in kits for peer administration. We assessed the feasibility of implementing a Take-home Naloxone (THN) intervention in emergency settings, as part of designing a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT).

METHODS

We undertook a clustered RCT on sites pairing UK Emergency Departments (ED) and ambulance services. At intervention sites, we recruited emergency healthcare practitioners to supply THN to patients presenting with opioid overdose or related condition, with recruitment across 2019-2021. We assessed feasibility of intervention implementation against four predetermined progression criteria covering site sign up and staff training; identification of eligible patients; issue of THN kits and Serious Adverse Events.

RESULTS

At two intervention sites, randomly selected from 4, 299/687 (43.5%) clinical staff were trained (ED1 = 107, AS1 = 121, ED2 = 25, AS2 = 46). Sixty THN kits were supplied to eligible patients (21.7%) (n: ED1 = 36, AS1 = 4, ED2 = 16, AS2 = 4). Across sites, kits were not issued to eligible patients on a further 164 occasions, with reasons reported including: staff forgot (n = 136), staff too busy (n = 15), and suspected intentional overdose (n = 3), no kit available (n = 2), already given by drugs nurse (n = 4), other (n = 4). Staff recorded 626 other patients as ineligible but considered for inclusion, with reasons listed as: patient admitted to hospital (n = 194), patient absconded (n = 161) already recruited (n = 64), uncooperative or abusive (n = 55), staff not trained (n = 43), reduced consciousness level (n = 41), lack of capacity (n = 35), patient in custody (n = 21), other (n = 12). No adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Staff and patient recruitment were low and varied widely by site. This feasibility study did not meet progression criteria; a fully powered RCT is not planned.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN13232859 (Registered 16/02/2018).

摘要

背景

阿片类药物的致死人数超过任何其他类别的药物。纳洛酮是一种阿片类拮抗剂,可以分发给同伴进行管理。我们评估了在紧急情况下实施带药回家纳洛酮(THN)干预的可行性,这是设计一项确定性随机对照试验(RCT)的一部分。

方法

我们在英国急诊部(ED)和救护服务配对的地点进行了一项聚类 RCT。在干预地点,我们招募急诊医疗保健从业人员向阿片类药物过量或相关病症的患者提供 THN,招募工作于 2019 年至 2021 年进行。我们根据四个预定的进展标准评估干预实施的可行性,这些标准涵盖了站点注册和员工培训;确定合格患者;发放 THN 试剂盒和严重不良事件。

结果

在从 4 个地点中随机选择的两个干预地点,对 299/687 名(43.5%)临床工作人员进行了培训(ED1=107,AS1=121,ED2=25,AS2=46)。向 60 名符合条件的患者提供了 THN 试剂盒(21.7%)(n:ED1=36,AS1=4,ED2=16,AS2=4)。在所有地点,另有 164 名符合条件的患者未获得试剂盒,原因包括:工作人员忘记(n=136)、工作人员太忙(n=15)、疑似故意过量(n=3)、无试剂盒可用(n=2)、已由药物护士发放(n=4)、其他(n=4)。工作人员记录了 626 名其他不符合条件但被认为有资格纳入的患者,列出的原因包括:患者住院(n=194)、患者逃跑(n=161)、已招募(n=64)、不合作或辱骂(n=55)、工作人员未培训(n=43)、意识水平降低(n=41)、无能力(n=35)、患者被拘留(n=21)、其他(n=12)。没有报告不良事件。

结论

工作人员和患者的招募人数很少,且各地点差异很大。这项可行性研究未达到进展标准;不计划进行完全有效的 RCT。

试验注册

ISRCTN8226503(2018 年 2 月 16 日注册)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3e2/11360782/3d058661e980/12873_2024_1061_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3e2/11360782/3d058661e980/12873_2024_1061_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3e2/11360782/3d058661e980/12873_2024_1061_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Take-home naloxone administered in emergency settings: feasibility of intervention implementation in a cluster randomized trial.在紧急情况下携带纳洛酮:一项集群随机试验中干预措施实施的可行性。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 29;24(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01061-3.
2
Is a randomised controlled trial of take home naloxone distributed in emergency settings likely to be feasible and acceptable? Findings from a UK qualitative study exploring perspectives of people who use opioids and emergency services staff.在急诊环境中分发可携带纳洛酮的随机对照试验是否可行和可接受?一项英国定性研究探索了阿片类药物使用者和急诊服务人员的观点。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 29;24(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00987-y.
3
Protocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility study.多中心急诊环境中可带回家的纳洛酮(TIME)方案:可行性研究
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Jul 9;6:96. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00626-w. eCollection 2020.
4
Overdose and take-home naloxone in emergency settings: A pilot study examining feasibility of delivering brief interventions addressing overdose prevention with 'take-home naloxone' in emergency departments.在紧急情况下的过量用药和携带纳洛酮回家:一项试点研究,考察在急诊科提供针对预防过量用药的“携带纳洛酮回家”的简短干预措施的可行性。
Emerg Med Australas. 2022 Aug;34(4):509-518. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13925. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
5
Patient characteristics associated with being offered take home naloxone in a busy, urban emergency department: a retrospective chart review.在繁忙的城市急诊部门,与提供纳洛酮带回家相关的患者特征:回顾性图表审查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Sep 5;19(1):632. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4469-3.
6
Paramedic-supplied 'Take Home' Naloxone: protocol for cluster randomised feasibility study.护理人员提供的“带回家”纳洛酮:整群随机可行性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2014 Mar 20;4(3):e004712. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004712.
7
Design details for overdose education and take-home naloxone kits: Codesign with family medicine, emergency department, addictions medicine and community.过量用药教育和可携带纳洛酮套件的设计细节:与家庭医学、急诊部、成瘾医学和社区共同进行联合设计。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2440-2452. doi: 10.1111/hex.13559. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
8
Evaluating the impact of a national naloxone programme on ambulance attendance at overdose incidents: a controlled time-series analysis.评估国家纳洛酮计划对过量用药事件救护车出勤情况的影响:一项对照时间序列分析。
Addiction. 2017 Feb;112(2):301-308. doi: 10.1111/add.13602. Epub 2016 Nov 6.
9
A qualitative study of repeat naloxone administrations during opioid overdose intervention by people who use opioids in New York City.纽约市使用阿片类药物者在阿片类药物过量干预期间重复使用纳洛酮的定性研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jan;87:102968. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102968. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
10
Development of a take-home naloxone program at an urban academic emergency department.在城市学术急诊部门开发带教纳洛酮计划。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Nov-Dec;60(6):e324-e331. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.06.017. Epub 2020 Jul 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Is a randomised controlled trial of take home naloxone distributed in emergency settings likely to be feasible and acceptable? Findings from a UK qualitative study exploring perspectives of people who use opioids and emergency services staff.在急诊环境中分发可携带纳洛酮的随机对照试验是否可行和可接受?一项英国定性研究探索了阿片类药物使用者和急诊服务人员的观点。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 29;24(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00987-y.
2
A rapid assessment of take-home naloxone provision during COVID-19 in Europe.在 COVID-19 期间欧洲家庭内纳洛酮供应的快速评估。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Sep;107:103787. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103787. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
3
Drug overdose death rates in different countries: Who should be alarmed?
不同国家的药物过量死亡率:谁应该警惕?
Australas Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;30(1):26-30. doi: 10.1177/10398562221075192.
4
Is Europe facing an opioid crisis like the United States? An analysis of opioid use and related adverse effects in 19 European countries between 2010 and 2018.欧洲是否正在面临类似美国的阿片类药物危机?对 2010 年至 2018 年 19 个欧洲国家阿片类药物使用情况及相关不良反应的分析。
Eur Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 21;64(1):e47. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.2219.
5
Explaining the Differences in Opioid Overdose Deaths between Scotland and England/Wales: Implications for European Opioid Policies.解释苏格兰和英格兰/威尔士之间阿片类药物过量死亡的差异:对欧洲阿片类药物政策的影响。
Eur Addict Res. 2021;27(6):399-412. doi: 10.1159/000516165. Epub 2021 May 7.
6
Increasing Naloxone Prescribing in the Emergency Department Through Education and Electronic Medical Record Work-Aids.通过教育和电子病历辅助工具增加急诊科纳洛酮的处方量。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021 Jun;47(6):364-375. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
7
Healthcare use by people who use illicit opioids (HUPIO): development of a cohort based on electronic primary care records in England.使用非法阿片类药物者的医疗保健利用情况(HUPIO):基于英格兰电子初级保健记录建立队列研究
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 May 5;5:282. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16431.2. eCollection 2020.
8
Public involvement and engagement in primary and emergency care research: the story from PRIME Centre Wales.公众参与和参与初级及急救护理研究:威尔士PRIME中心的故事。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2020 Sep 30;5(3):1363. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i3.1363.
9
Protocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility study.多中心急诊环境中可带回家的纳洛酮(TIME)方案:可行性研究
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Jul 9;6:96. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00626-w. eCollection 2020.
10
Opioid-related deaths in Europe: Strategies for a comprehensive approach to address a major public health concern.欧洲与阿片类药物相关的死亡:应对重大公共卫生问题的综合策略。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Feb;76:102616. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.102616. Epub 2019 Dec 16.