Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Ann Transplant. 2022 Jul 19;27:e936609. doi: 10.12659/AOT.936609.
BACKGROUND Excessive portal flow to an allograft was a key mechanism for small-for-size syndrome in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Good outcomes in LDLT by graft inflow modulation (GIM) using a small graft were reported, but the effect on hepatic hemodynamics is undefined. This report summarizes our experience with GIM and compares the effects of splenic artery ligation (SAL) and splenectomy on hepatic hemodynamic changes. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ninety-nine patients who underwent adult-to-adult LDLT from June 2014 to December 2020 were included in this study. GIM was performed in 36 patients (17 patients with SAL and 19 with splenectomy). RESULTS The GIM group had lower graft-to-recipient weight compared to the no-modulation group (median, 0.91% versus 1.04%, P=0.022). Initial portal venous flow (PVF) was higher in the GIM group (median, 311 versus 156 ml/min/100 g, P<0.001). After GIM, PVF decreased to 224 ml/min/100 g. One-year graft survival with GIM was 89.9%, and for the no-modulation group it was 86.6% (P=0.945). In the subgroup analysis, the efficacy of decompressing PVF was higher in the splenectomy subgroup (median, 14.3% versus 41.8%, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS GIM was useful for grafts with high PVF. Splenectomy modulated excessive PVF more effectively than did SAL. Perioperative hepatic hemodynamic changes could assist surgeons in selecting different GIM strategies.
在活体肝移植(LDLT)中,供肝向受体的门静脉血流过多是小肝综合征的一个关键机制。使用小移植物进行流入调节(GIM)的 LDLT 取得了良好的结果,但对肝血流动力学的影响尚不清楚。本报告总结了我们使用 GIM 的经验,并比较了脾动脉结扎(SAL)和脾切除术对肝血流动力学变化的影响。
本研究纳入了 2014 年 6 月至 2020 年 12 月期间接受成人对成人 LDLT 的 99 例患者。36 例患者(17 例 SAL 和 19 例脾切除术)进行了 GIM。
与未调节组相比,GIM 组的供肝与受体体重比更低(中位数,0.91%对 1.04%,P=0.022)。GIM 组的初始门静脉血流(PVF)较高(中位数,311 对 156 ml/min/100 g,P<0.001)。GIM 后,PVF 降至 224 ml/min/100 g。GIM 组的 1 年移植物存活率为 89.9%,未调节组为 86.6%(P=0.945)。在亚组分析中,脾切除术组降低 PVF 的效果更高(中位数,14.3%对 41.8%,P=0.002)。
GIM 对高 PVF 的移植物有效。脾切除术比 SAL 更有效地调节过多的 PVF。围手术期肝血流动力学变化可以帮助外科医生选择不同的 GIM 策略。